Lopsided universe demands different explanation
Analysis of radiation left over from the Big Bang point to a possible new type of field in early universe
Web edition : Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008
font_down font_up Text Size
access
ASYMMETRIESMap depicts tiny hot and cold spots, no more than 200 microkelvins above or below the average temperature of the cosmic microwave background, the radiation left over from the Big Bang. Possible asymmetries in the data --- slightly larger deviations in the average temperature over one half of the sky than the other --- may indicate that the standard model of the origin of the universe may need to be modified. IMAGE CREDIT: WMAP Science Team, NASA

For a group of scientists who profess to love the symmetries in nature, cosmologists and astronomers spend an awful lot of time looking for and analyzing imbalances in the cosmic architecture.

A new study, reported in the Dec. 16 Physical Review Letters, seeks to explain why half of the sky appears to have larger deviations from the average temperature of the radiation in the cosmic microwave background, the remnant heat left over from the Big Bang, than the other half does.

The lopsided distribution in temperature may provide new insights about the earliest moments in the universe, when the cosmos underwent a brief but enormous growth spurt, expanding from subatomic scales to something the size of a soccer ball in just a tiny fraction of a second. It also suggests that the distribution of galaxies in the sky today — how closely they cluster — may exhibit subtle variations linked to differences in those early moments.

Researchers have known since 1992 that the microwave background is riddled with tiny temperature variations. These relatively hot and cold spots mark fluctuations in the density of the infant universe that ultimately gave rise to the population of galaxies seen today.

But it’s only recently, using data from NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, or WMAP, that astronomers have found hints that the contrast between hotter and colder temperatures in the microwave background is more pronounced on one side of the sky than on the other.

Marc Kamionkowski, Adrienne Erickcek and Sean Carroll, all of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, take this temperature asymmetry as a given, although its statistical significance remains under debate.

The early era of hyperexpansion, known as inflation, can explain many features of the modern-day universe, including the general uniformity over regions of the sky that are today separated by vast distances.

In the simplest model of the inflation of the universe, a field called the inflaton plays two roles. It provides the energy that drives the expansion and also generates the seeds of galaxy formation: quantum density fluctuations that enlarge to become the hot and cold spots in the microwave background. This simple model, however, doesn’t reproduce the apparent asymmetry actually observed with WMAP, Kamionkowski says.

To account for the asymmetry, Kamionkowski and his colleagues propose that the inflaton has a more limited role. It would only provide the energy that drives cosmic inflation. A separate field, called the curvaton and proposed by other theorists about six years ago, would act as a silent spectator during expansion. But just afterward, quantum fluctuations in the curvaton field would convert to the fluctuations in density from which researchers believe galaxies arose.

“This idea gives you a bit more freedom in constructing models, as you have separated out the requirements to get sufficient inflation from the requirements to get appropriate density fluctuations,” says Carroll. “That was crucial to our model,” he adds.

With just a single field, the inflaton, having to do two jobs — providing the energy to both drive inflation and to generate initial density fluctuations — it’s impossible to get both the asymmetry between the different halves of the sky and the actual magnitude of the tiny temperature differences observed in the microwave background, Carroll says. Any asymmetry that would be attained with just the inflaton field would come with larger deviations within the microwave background from the average temperature than is actually measured.

If the curvaton exists, it would produce a different pattern of primordial density fluctuations than the simplest model of inflation would. Those fluctuations, imprinted on in the cosmic microwave background, are too small to be found by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe but they would be readily detected by the European Space Agency’s Planck mission, now scheduled for launch in April 2009, Kamionkowski says. In addition, those differences in the primordial fluctuations may produce a larger clustering of galaxies on one side of the universe than the other, for which future telescope surveys could search.

Princeton cosmologist David Spergel says he finds the Caltech study intriguing but cautions that published studies only reveal the asymmetry over large scales, comparing patches of sky larger than the area of the full moon. “It’s important to show that the [apparent] asymmetry is independent of scale,” he says, “…so the statistical significance of the asymmetry is controversial.” 


Found in: Astronomy, Atom & Cosmos and Physics
Comments 8
  • It may be the case that there is some large scale structure located in higher dimensional space that it exerting influence on the CMBR assymetry by way of the force of gravity or perhaps some other type of force that has not yet been discovered but which can exert it effects through higher dimensional or parallel dimensional space.

    We will have to wait to see what the European Space Agency’s Planck mission will uncover. The results should be interesting regardless of the observational outcomes that occur.

    It is interesting that just as we had a "particle zoo" regarding the discovery of large numbers of particle species during the 1950s and 1960s, we seem to be having a field based analogue.

    We know of two long range fields, the electromanetic force and the gravitational force. The electromagnetic force can be broken down into the electic field, the magnetic field, and the electromagnetic wave. Now we are perhaps poised to discover the Higgs field via the observation of the decay of the Higgs boson when the LHC of CERN resumes operation.

    There is obviously talk of dark energy and now the inflation field and the curvaton field. Add to these fields the strong nuclear force field and the weak nuclear force field, as well as the bosonic fields associated with supersymmetric charge leptons or the sleptons, the bosonic supersymmetric fields associated with the quarks or the squarks, and the bosonic supersymmetric fields associated with the neutrinos or the sneutrinos, and one starts to see a "field zoo" emerge.

    The is as interesting of a time as ever within the field of observational cosmology which has become a precision field wherein testable theories can be compared with precise observational data, and further compared with numerical simulations of super computers within the Petaflops speed range.

    I think the fun has only just begun.
    James  Essig James Essig
    Dec. 23, 2008 at 11:35pm
  • Indeed the change of CMB temperature is the change of temperature of aether and it does not connect with the myth of "Big Bang" or "earlier" Universe. The Universe is eternal.
    There is a good article on CMB temperature written by Prof. Andre Assis http://www.dfi.uem.br/~macedane/history_of_2.7k.html
    There is my article on aether temperature variations http://bourabai.kz/redshifts-e.htm
    Karim Khaidarov Karim Khaidarov
    Dec. 24, 2008 at 11:46am
  • Might the discrepancy of the CMB that we are seeing be due to our position inside the universe? I’ve heard stories likening the growth of our universe to the expansion of a balloon. Suppose we are inside the balloon, but we are not in the center of the balloon. Now the ballon is expanding at a uniform rate, but being as we are not at the center, the walls of the balloon are moving away from us at different rates. The side that we are farthest from would also be moving away from us at a faster rate than the side that we are nearer. Now I know that we can’t see the boundaries of our universe, but we do have the CMB to look at. Might the expansion difference of the universe due to our location also cause this difference in the readings that we are getting from the CMB?
    Dusty Matter Dusty Matter
    Dec. 28, 2008 at 9:29am
  • All the phenomens can be explained by one force and this force is the pressure!


    We can describe by people what happens in the atomcores all the time. For example one thousand people can go to the space and curl up close to each other. Now we have made an energyconsentration of people that covers a certain spot of the space. We know that the biggest part of the atoms is empty space. Also between people there exists empty space that does not expand or curve.

    Now these people can begin to straighten or in other words to open up and this way they push themselves away from each other. One can observe the hardest pressure in the middle of this human energyconsentration and people who locate in the middle must do an enormeous job so that they woun´t
    flatten in the centre. These people in the centre sweat the most. This is excactly the same thing that happens without gravitation for example in the centre of the earth and in the centre of the sun.

    The density of the human energyconsentration reduces and the people push themselves away from the centre of the human energyconsentration. Now for a little while we can observe a phenomen of gravitation without a drawing force (that actually does not exist) on the surface of the human energyconsentration.

    In my opinion the space does not expand or curve. If it would expand, could you describe how does the space expand?

    It is easy to describe how the energy all the time turns into a less dense energy in the atomcores, so I think that it is time to forget all about the magical expanding and curving of the space. You can also forget all the spare spacedimentions, the dark substance and the dark energy.

    So the space does not expand or curve!

    The atomcores expand and open up expanding electrons and expanding photons and they beam their expanding energy as waves away from themselves. This is how it goes!

    When you look at the galaxy, you can understand that the energy inside the galaxy is denser than outside the galaxy. If you look at a star, you can understand that energy inside the star is denser than outside the star. This way you will know for sure that the energy inside the atomcore is denser than outside the atomcore. It is not difficult to understand that the energy inside the protons / neutrons is denser than outside of them and the energy inside the qvarks is denser than outside the qvarks and so on...

    It it also easy to realize that outside the visible universe the is an area, where is really much more energy than the visible universe has all together and the energy some where out there is much denser than than it is in a visible universe.

    That three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentration that bems energywaves with the nature of the galaxies, is formed also from separate three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentrations ect. And so the smaller separate energyconsentrations we talk about, the denser and denser the energy is all the time.

    So the atomcore does not have a centre point, where the energy would be denser than outside it. There is no centre point also at the universe, outside which the energy would be less denser.

    Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe.
    Mr. Pressure Mr. Pressure
    Dec. 28, 2008 at 5:56pm
  • Excuse bad English!

    Important!

    All of the visible universe of energy moving at an existing mode! Before this energy was born in substance, the stars and the lights!

    In one moment all of the visible universe of energy is moving out of the state in which the visible universe of energy now on! The next moment out of the state where moved, etc.!

    Thus the atoms fit to explode, namely to expand the existing mode all the time.

    An accelerating pace?
    Mr. Pressure Mr. Pressure
    Dec. 28, 2008 at 5:57pm
  • New and right model of an atom

    The atomcores expand three-dimentionally, (opening up) emit energywaves that have the nature of electron and photon.

    Also electrons and photons expand three-dimentionally and emit energy who expand!

    In space who does not expand or curve!
    Mr. Pressure Mr. Pressure
    Dec. 28, 2008 at 6:03pm
  • There is neither a substance/matter which turns into energy!

    It is only the energy that changes the whole period of less high density energy! Mode/space which does not change!
    Mr. Pressure Mr. Pressure
    Dec. 28, 2008 at 6:18pm
  • Inflaton plays a role in two different ways, two climate changes.
    http://ultrareview.net
    http://startwebsite.org
    Tom Schavo Tom Schavo
    Nov. 13, 2009 at 7:30am
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator