In the young universe, black holes may have formed first
Findings pose a possible answer to long-standing question of when the black holes at galactic centers formed.
Web edition : Wednesday, January 7th, 2009
font_down font_up Text Size
access
BLACK HOLES FROM AFARThis visible-light image taken by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey revealed a very distant galaxy with an active black hole. Researchers then used powerful radio telescopes at the Very Large Array near Socorro, N.M. to weigh the central region of the galaxy. The image at right taken by the VLA shows gas in a young galaxy seen as it appeared when the universe was only 870 million years old.NRAO/AUI/NSF, SDSS

LONG BEACH, Calif. — For years, astronomers have pondered a cosmic version of the chicken-and-egg problem: Which came first, monster black holes or the galaxies in which they reside? A new study hints that the black holes formed first.

Supermassive black holes cram the equivalent of millions to billions of suns into a volume smaller than the solar systems at the centers of galaxies. The preliminary finding suggests that early in the universe, supermassive black holes had already packed on most of their mass, and that the fireworks and fierce winds associated with the holes’ rapid growth triggered the formation of the black holes’ host galaxies, says Chris Carilli of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Socorro, N.M. He reported his team’s study at a January 7 press briefing during the winter meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

But if supermassive black holes did grow rapidly in the early universe, they would have needed to snare mass from their surroundings at the maximum rate possible almost from the very beginning of the universe. Theorists aren't sure if that’s a realistic model. That's "one of the real sticking points in structure formation that could bring the whole house of cards down," says Carilli.

Previous studies over the past decade, which examined galaxies much closer to Earth, had revealed a remarkable link between the supermassive black holes these galaxies house and the amount of gas and stars contained in the galaxies’ bulges — the regions that lie within a few thousand light-years of the galaxies’ cores. Regardless of their size, the bulges always turned out to be 700 times as massive as the giant black holes at the galaxies’ hubs.

That relationship suggested that galaxies and their central black holes have grown in tandem during relatively recent times in the cosmos. But astronomers didn’t know if the link held true for galaxies and their supermassive black holes during the early history of the universe.

To find out, Carilli and his collaborators, which include Dominik Riechers of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, used two networks of radio telescopes — the Very Large Array near Socorro and the Plateau de Bure Interferometer in the French Alps — to weigh the bulges of distant galaxies known to house supermassive black holes. The galaxies were observed as they appeared when the 13.7-billion-year-old universe was less than 2 billion years old.

From the motions of the molecular gas, which concentrates in the central part of the galaxies, the team calculated the total amount of mass in the bulges and compared that number to the mass of the central black holes.

The astronomers found that the relationship appears to break down in galaxies from this long-ago era. The supermassive black holes are much heavier, relative to the mass of the bulges, than in galaxies in the universe today.

“These very distant black holes are already about as massive as they will ever get — about 1 billion solar masses — so the only thing left is for the galaxy to form around them,” says Carilli. One implication, he says, is that the turbulent activity associated with accretion onto these black holes “may have a profound effect on the formation of the host galaxy very early in the universe.” But Carilli emphasizes that his team has examined only four galaxies from these early times. It’s possible, he says, that this handful of galaxies may have unusually heavy supermassive black holes.

“We really need to generalize to more galaxies that are less extreme,” he adds. Carilli says studies that include a much larger number of early galaxies should be possible with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, or ALMA, a network of radio telescopes now under construction in Chile.

“The results are interesting, and an important clue to the growth and evolution of galaxies,” comments Martin Rees of the University of Cambridge in England. However, he adds, “I think it is over-interpreting the data to say that ‘black holes come first.’ Even at [early times] the bulge mass could typically be about 100 times larger than the mass of the hole.”

Rees suggests that the bulges and holes form concurrently throughout cosmic history, but that in the early universe “it may be easier for infalling gas to go all the way to the center of a galaxy, forming a black hole rather than condensing into stars on the way in.”

A key question that’s still unanswered, he adds, is whether galaxies must have a minimum mass in order to possess a central black hole. “This is relevant to the issue of how the 'seed' black holes form, and to the role of mergers … in building up galaxies,” says Rees.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos
Comments 3
  • EVOLUTION Beyond Darwin 200


    I.
    At Darwin 200
    Darwin Extended Beyond His Own Horizon
    Rethought Unified Field Theory And Evolution

    A. SN Special : Darwin turns 200
    http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/39754/title/SN_Special__Darwin_turns_200
    This special web edition of Science News includes expanded versions of articles from the magazine's print edition plus two additional features, all commemorating the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin.

    B. 22nd Century Conception Of Unified Field Theory And Evolution

    The following brief essays present the 22nd century comprehension of evolution. They preserve Darwin's name in reference to Life Evolution in respect and appreciation of Darwin's promotion of the concept of evolution in life.

    Life's Manifest
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/112.page#578

    Culture, A Ubiquitous Biological Entity
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/98.page

    Life And Darwinian Evolution, 21st Century Comprehension
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/112.page

    Rethink Unified Field Theory And Evolution
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/60/122.page#982


    II.
    Evolution beyond Darwin 200

    Per "Design And Randomness In Cosmic And Life Evolution"
    http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=404

    Singularity and D-Infinity (max expansion, energy dilution) are the cosmic end states. Their in-between is a metastable state. This corresponds to commonsense observation: the denser the compacting goal of material the more energy is required, and vice versa the more thorough the disintegration of material the higher the amount of energy released. It seems that the cosmic universal process is E=Total[m(1+D)] , where D is the Distance from Big Bang point and the sum is of all spatial values of D from D=0 to D=selected value.

    Presently the cosmos expands on the right side of the equation. However, within its accelerating overall energy dilution there are local phenomena of formation of temporarily constrained energy pockets that evolve backwords towards impansion. The two most obvious examples of such backword energy constraints are black holes and life, two distant relatives within a probably big family of various forms of cosmic 'backlash energy constraints'.


    Suggesting,

    Dov Henis

    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Jan. 26, 2009 at 3:21am
  • The radio spectrum seen by ARCADE “ may be the signature of the formation of the super massive black holes in the early univers.
    Louis Brassard Louis Brassard
    Jan. 11, 2009 at 2:56pm
  • Black hole and Big bang.
    1.
    A black hole is a theoretical region of space in which the
    gravitational field is so powerful that nothing can escape.
    2.
    Hawking Radiation theorizes that black holes do not,
    in fact, absorb all matter absolutely; they give off some
    return matter.
    3.
    Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
    (all elementary particles and all quarks and their
    girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, all kinds of
    waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons…
    gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a ‘single point ‘

    The reason of this unity is gravitational force.
    4.
    How does this ‘single point ‘ created if the matter
    can escape from any strong gravitational force?
    ==========..
    Matter and ‘dark matter.‘
    Fact and Speculation.
    =========.
    1.
    Fact.
    The detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
    (the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
    p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it cannot “ close “ the Universe and therefore
    our Universe as whole is “ open”, endless.
    But what to do with the infinite Universe the physicists don't know.
    The concept of infinite/ eternal means nothing
    to a scientists. They do not understand how they could
    draw any real, concrete conclusions from this characteristic.
    A notions of "more", "less", "equally, "similar" could not
    be conformed to a word infinity or eternity.
    The Infinity/Eternity is something, that has no borders,
    has no discontinuity; it could not be compared to anything.
    Considering so, scientists came to conclusion that the
    infinity/eternity defies to a physical and mathematical definition
    and cannot be considered in real processes.
    Therefore they have proclaimed the strict requirement
    (on a level of censor of the law):
    « If we want that the theory would be correct,
    the infinity/eternity should be eliminated ».
    Thus they direct all their mathematical abilities,
    all intellectual energy to the elimination of infinity.
    Therefore they invented an abstract "dark matter" and " dark energy".
    They say: " 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen.
    And nobody knows what it is.
    2.
    Speculation.
    Unknown “dark matter “ it is matter which makes up the difference
    between observed mass of a galaxies and calculated mass……
    which….will …” close “ ….the Universe, as …….
    as……the astrophysicists want.
    3.
    The Dark Matter is another official dogma of our astronomy.
    / V. H. Vergon. /
    ==============..
    The Dark Energy and the Vacuum.

    "Dark energy, this mysterious stuff in the vacuum of space
    which makes the universe want to accelerate, is the basis
    for standard cosmology today because it explains much
    of what we see,"
    / Research by Dr David Wiltshire, from
    New Zealand's University of Canterbury /.
    ============= . .
    My opinion.

    The Dark Energy is the Vacuum.
    Vacuum is not a dead space as the Classic Physics says.
    Vacuum is some kind of Energetic Space as the
    Quantum Theory says.
    The Energetic Vacuum itself is ‘ The Dark Energy ‘.
    The physicists only invent new word ‘Dark Energy ‘ instead of
    to say ‘ ENERGETIC VACUUM ’.
    #
    Dark Energy may be Vacuum
    http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-01/uoc-dem011607.php
    ========== . .
    Everything began from Infinite Energetic Vacuum: T=0K.
    Somehow, the energy is extracted from the Vacuum
    (the Energetic Dirac Soup) and turned into particles.
    The Materialistic World gets its finite being
    from an Infinite Energetic Being – Vacuum: T=0K.

    To understand this ‘speculation’ we must know:
    1. What is Vacuum: T=0K ?
    2. Which virtual particles can exist in Vacuum?
    3. How can virtual particles turn into real particles?
    ======== .
    Until now the physicists ignore the Vacuum Energy T=0K
    because it is the Zero Point Energy for our measuring devices.
    Because the Absolute Zero Point Energy is border for our
    measuring devices.
    Can this fact be enough reason to stop our investigation?
    ==========..
    #
    When the next revolution rocks physics,
    chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum, that endless
    infinite void.
    http://discovermagazine.com/topics/space
    http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18-nothingness-of-space-theory-of-everything
    ================ . .
    Please, have patience and wait “when the next revolution rocks physics.”
    ==========..
    Best wishes.
    Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
    http://www.socratus.com
    http://www.wbabin.net
    http://www.wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htm
    http://www.wbabin.net/physics/sadovnik.pdf

    ================
    israel socratus israel socratus
    Jan. 7, 2009 at 11:42pm
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator