Advertisement

Science Friday
Duplication in genomes may separate humans from apes
A sudden peak in copying and rearranging of DNA shaped great ape species
font_down font_up Text Size
access
DUPLICATION DIFFERENCEView Larger Version | A burst of duplications happened in the genome of the common ancestor of humans and African great apes between 8 million and 12 million years ago. The numbers closest to the pictures indicate millions of duplicated bases that are unique to each species. For example, 13.6 million bases duplicated in the human genome are not duplicated in the genomes of the other species.Marques-Bonet et al., Nature, Feb. 12, 2009

Although it may not be as dramatic as the Big Bang birthing the universe, an explosion of DNA duplication in the common ancestor of humans, chimpanzees and gorillas may be responsible for many of the differences among the species, a new study suggests. The big blowup happened 8 million to 12 million years ago, but its effects are still apparent today.

Human and great ape genes are notoriously similar, with few differences in the genetic letters that make up the instruction manual for building each of the primates. But gorillas, orangutans, chimpanzees and humans are obviously different. A new analysis of the entire genomes of humans and their ape cousins, published in the Feb. 11 Nature, suggests the differences may have roots in DNA duplications.

Researchers led by Evan Eichler, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at the University of Washington in Seattle, compared the genomes of macaques, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos and humans. The scientists found that chunks of the genomes had been copied and rearranged, sometimes multiple times, within each of the lineages.

After orangutans branched off the primate family tree, duplication rates accelerated dramatically in the common ancestor of gorillas, chimpanzees and humans.The burst continued in the common ancestor of humans and chimps, but then slowed again. At the same time that duplication rates were heating up, other types of mutation — such as single letters changes in the genetic sequence — slowed down.

access
NOT LIKE THE OTHERSView Larger Version | Duplication could make the difference: A segment of DNA found only once in the human genome (green circle) has been duplicated in chimpanzees and gorillas multiple times (pink arrows). Some segments duplicated once in chimpanzees are multiplied in humans (not shown).Marques-Bonet et al., Nature, Feb. 12, 2009

All the duplication activity resulted in structural differences in the architecture of the genome among the species on a scale not previously appreciated. Because earlier studies had only looked at single genes or small parts of the genome, these larger-scale changes were not apparent.

 “This paper suggests that the real variation leading to the human lineage is structural,” says Mark Gerstein, a bioinformatician at Yale University. “I think it’s plausible that copy number or structural variation can affect things even more than mutation – single base changes – can.”

Changing a single base, or DNA letter, is likely to have a limited effect because such mutations alter only a single gene. But large duplications containing 20,000 bases or more, such as the ones mapped in the new study, may contain more than one gene or parts of genes and regulatory regions.

Doubling, tripling or quadrupling the number of copies of a piece of DNA in the genome can potentially increase activity of genes contained in the chunks by a corresponding amount. A duplication might contain some parts of a gene, but not all of it, which could change the gene’s function. And duplications might contain control panels for genes, Gerstein says. Copying those control panels, in full or in part, and inserting them somewhere else in the genome could change the activity of genes adjacent to the insertion point.

Duplications don’t appear to happen randomly, the researchers found. Most duplications occurred next to more ancient duplications, creating hot spots in the genome susceptible to copying and rearranging. These slippery parts of the genome provide flexibility for adaptation to new environments, but they have a downside as well.

Instability has been linked to disease in humans. Cancer cells notoriously have duplications, rearrangements and deletions in their genomes. Unstable DNA also predisposes people to disorders such as autism, mental retardation and schizophrenia. Because duplications linked to autism and schizophrenia are so recent, it is likely that these neurodevelopmental disorders are also quite young, the researchers say.

About 20 percent of the duplications identified in the study are found only in humans. Most of the replicated chunks contain genes with unknown function, so the next step of the project is to figure out how the duplications happen and how the genes inside them contribute to making humans human.

But humans aren’t the only ones with extra DNA specific to their species, says Jeff Kidd, a genomics researcher in Eichler’s lab.

“If you and I were two chimpanzees talking, we’d be talking about how 20 percent of duplications are unique to chimps,” Kidd says. “It’s all a matter of perspective.”


Found in: Genes & Cells
Comments 9
  • To use the word chimpanzee without further specification is arrogant, ignorant, unscientific human supremest dogma. Chimpanzees and Bonobos are two completely different species. Why is our closest relative not shown? Could it be that Bonobos are so uncomfortably genetically close that they are either unscientifically conflated with Chimpanzees or completely censored out?
    mark.c.oliver@gmail.com mark.c.oliver@gmail.com
    Feb. 12, 2009 at 1:50am
  • Dear inveganathiest: take a deep breath and relax. Bonobos are, in fact, mentioned in the article. As far as "human supremest dogma" is concerned, the word you were groping for is actually "supremacist". If you're going to get your knickers in a twist over a brief article like this you're never going to have enough energy to fight the big battles.
    SciMuse SciMuse
    Feb. 12, 2009 at 3:44pm
  • Bonobos are mentioned, but are the two charts those of Common Chimpanzees, Bonobos, or some kind of mixed average of the two? What is your explanation for unscientific ambiguity? Why doesn't our closest relative rate an entry on these charts of its own? Science News is usually a great resource for trying to educate my massively ignorant* Luddite vegan community.
    * Not as massively ignorant, or psychotic, as the non-vegan community.
    mark.c.oliver@gmail.com mark.c.oliver@gmail.com
    Feb. 13, 2009 at 4:33am
  • See "Genetic Effects of Culture" at

    [Link was removed]

    Suggesting
    Dov Henis
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Feb. 21, 2009 at 12:24am
  • The chimpanzees shown on the chart are chimpanzees and not bonobos. The researchers did not provide a diagram that included bonobos for use in Science News, but the original research paper does contain separate data for chimpanzees and bonobos.
    Tina Hesman Saey Tina Hesman Saey
    Feb. 24, 2009 at 4:39pm
  • Pretty interesting article. Evolution as a concept is so deep and always amazing. Ask Amy [Link was removed] for dating advice.
    Ryan Ryan
    Aug. 20, 2009 at 7:15pm
  • It's incredible how far we've come. I'm always amazed at what science will show us next. Josh [Link was removed]
    Josh Josh
    Dec. 5, 2009 at 10:55pm
  • The latest research in this field is always bringing new information to light. Good read. Magnetic health therapy [Link was removed]
    jason smith jason smith
    Dec. 17, 2009 at 8:19pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat2 m9bnat m9bnat2
    Jan. 9, 2010 at 2:39am
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Marques-Bonet, T., Kidd, J.M., et al. 2009. A burst of segmental duplications in the genome of the African great ape ancestor. Nature 457(Feb. 12):877-881. doi:10.1038/nature07744
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator