Advertisement

Science Friday
Two satellites collide in Earth orbit
Debris generated from the collision is most abundant of any collision in years
Web edition : Thursday, February 12th, 2009
font_down font_up Text Size
access
SPACE JUNKThe white dots in this computer-generated graphic show the location of space debris that lie within 2,000 kilometers of Earth's surface, the most concentrated area for debris.IMAGE CREDIT: NASA Orbital Debris Program/JSC

The orbital highways above Earth have been getting more crowded for years, but until February 10 there had been no local big bang.

Two large satellites — a functioning U.S. device and a nonoperating Russian instrument — collided in Earth orbit about 800 kilometers over Siberia on February 10, creating a swarm of some 600 chunks of debris. “This is the first time we’ve had an accidental collision of this magnitude,” says Eugene G. Stansbery, an orbital debris expert at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.

The pieces have remained in the orbital plane of each satellite but are spreading out in altitude. Stansbery said that computer simulations indicated only a slight risk that some of the spreading debris could hit the International Space Station, which orbits 350 km above Earth. Debris is denser at 600 km above Earth, where the Hubble Space Telescope orbits, but the observatory is a much smaller target, he added.

The U.S. satellite was an Iridium 33, a common telecommunications spacecraft. The Russian device was a Kosmos 2251. The crash destroyed both satellites, which had orbits about 90 degrees apart relative to Earth.

Over the past two decades, three much smaller satellite crashes have occurred, Stansbery added. In 1991, a nonfunctioning Russian navigation satellite hit debris from another Russian satellite. Five years later, a French satellite called Cerise collided with the body of a French rocket. Most recently, in 2005, a U.S. rocket body collided with the third stage of a Chinese launch vehicle. But each of those collisions generated only one or two pieces of debris.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos and Technology
Comments 8
  • Good. This latest collision between satellites could be a blessing in disguise. Up until now, governments have demonstrated a near-total lack of responsibility by taking a "wait and see" approach on 1) Militarization of space 2) Space debris from planned or unplanned collisions 3) Fallout from nuclear reactors onboard satellites and space vehicles. Based on what we're now reading, it looks as though the debris from this latest "accident" will create a domino effect as it spreads out in that already crowded 300-600 mile altitude and destroys more satellites. In the end, this may be good, since other than communication, imaging and GPS, space is increasingly becoming the next war platform for the military industrial complex. To the extent this debris field thwarts their aims, all the better. The use of nuclear fuel in space endangers us all as is the weaponization of space. Ironically, this catastrophe may turn out to be the solution.
    Duncan Cover Duncan Cover
    Feb. 13, 2009 at 1:14pm
  • So Duncan, your point is that you have no life and are consumed by your own insecurities? That's just so cool.
    John Turner John Turner
    Feb. 13, 2009 at 7:49pm
  • I seen one of these objects enter the sky at 4:27 on 10th .I went online to look for info did not see any till the 12th very large object burning blueish green with small tail.
    Douglas Jackson Douglas Jackson
    Feb. 14, 2009 at 12:05pm
  • Tsk. This is a serious issue that needs to be addressed. It should not be ignored nor used for anti-military, anti-nuclear, or other political propaganda. I wonder if some kind of "sweeper" project would be feasible. Using some kind of sattelite with a large area and low mass to capture and ultimately dispose of smaller pieces of junk might help. Just a thought. There are clearly issues with high relative velocities, controlling the "sweeper", and so forth.
    Ed Ed
    Feb. 14, 2009 at 2:11pm
  • Genetic disorders are often caused by sperm DNA that has double strand breaks, copy number variations, point mutations and imprinting mutations that have to do with advancing paternal age. Men need to know about their biological clock and father babies in their 20s and very early



    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    iSo AsTaLaViSTa iSo AsTaLaViSTa
    Dec. 26, 2009 at 9:29pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat2 m9bnat m9bnat2
    Jan. 10, 2010 at 3:03am
  • Was very useful article. Thank you.. [Link was removed]
    asda asdasd asda asdasd
    Jan. 10, 2010 at 7:37pm
  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    Science News Science News
    Jan. 14, 2010 at 6:02pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator