Advertisement

Science Friday
Cloaked eye still sees
Hidden sensor could send, receive information without being detected
font_down font_up Text Size
access
CLOAK FOR COMMUNICATIONLike a rock thrown into a creek, an uncloaked sensor disrupts the uniform energy flow of electromagnetic waves (right). Unperturbed waves are shown in yellow arrows, while large disturbances in energy flow are shown in red. A new proposal for a cloaked sensor (left) would perturb the flow of energy much less, while allowing messages to still reach the sensor.Andrea Alù and Nader Engheta

Cell phone antennas, radio receivers and GPS devices may one day go incognito. In a paper to appear in Physical Review Letters, Nader Engheta and Andrea Alù propose a new cloaking method that cancels out the electromagnetic waves bouncing off an object. The concept may ultimately lead to surreptitious sensors that can collect and send messages without detection.

"This is a fascinating paper addressing a very important challenge,” says physicist Nikolay Zheludev at the University of Southampton in England. “The result could have metrological, environmental and defense applications when the idea is developed as a practical device.”

The new cloak manipulates electromagnetic waves — including light — not by blocking out the waves, but by working with them. Previous cloaks worked by diverting waves around an object. “We are asking the question, ‘Is it possible to put a layer around an object such that when a wave hits the object, the wave scatters less?’ ” says Engheta, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

Separately, the object and the cloak would both be visible. But the cloak would be designed so that when the two are together, the waves scattering off of both objects would add destructively. “If the cloak is designed properly, the effect is reduced, like a cancelling effect,” Engheta says. “It puts in balance the object and the cloak.”

The key is that electromagnetic waves still enter the cloaked area and hit the object — a requirement for an antenna to pick up a signal, for example. This feature is what separates the new work from other cloaking methods that completely isolate objects from the environment. “Some cloaks divert waves around an object. If you have a sensor in there, it won’t be able to measure the field,” says Engheta.

The cloak could also be designed to not interfere with certain types of outgoing waves (other than the ones being dampened), allowing the sensor to still send unperturbed messages.

“If you want to communicate, this is the cloak for you,” says John Pendry, a theoretical physicist at Imperial College London. In 2006, Pendry and his colleagues created the type of cloak that directs microwaves around an object. But he notes that isolating the object in this way would effectively rule out the option of sending or receiving signals.

A material with this new selective shielding ability “would be of great practical use,” Pendry says. Wrapping this type of cloak around devices perched on top of military vehicles could minimize telltale scattering while still allowing the sending and receiving of crucial messages.

Researchers have a long way to go before these cloaks become a reality. Each cloak has to be fine-tuned to suit the object it’s cloaking, and will probably work for only a small range of electromagnetic waves, Engheta says.

But the blueprint for the cloaks could work for any kind of electromagnetic waves, including light waves, radio waves and microwaves. “The concept is to scatter waves,” he says. “Whether you deal in microwaves or optics, the concept is similar.”


Found in: Physics and Technology
Comments 2
  • This kind of development often tends to scare me a bit. It would semm the average person would always be a few steps behind the government or the military here. The only ones with the ability to compete would be those with significant resources (i. e. foreign governments) to develop counter measures or those who could obtain such information and or technology from some rogue government with such resources.
    Tim Sherlock Tim Sherlock
    Apr. 17, 2009 at 5:08pm
  • "Hidden sensor could send, receive information without being detected"

    The subtitle is a little misleading. Sending data can still reveal your position to a passive receiver; the innovation is that cloak still *allows* transmission.

    This technique is used all the time by antenna designers to cancel reflections for energy being transmitted (and by reciprocity, received). It is inherently frequency sensitive (see next to last paragraph), working over a narrow frequency band if the reflections are separated on the order of a wavelength. So for light waves, you would have to put your cancelling reflection surfaces very close to the original reflection surfaces (and have considerably accurate manufacturing tolerances) to achieve even a small bandwidth. It might be possible to have multiple cloaks for different bands, but you have to make sure they are all transparent to your transmitted signal.
    Bill Comisky Bill Comisky
    Apr. 19, 2009 at 9:40am
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Castelvecchi, D. 2008. Invisibility within sight. Science News 174(Aug. 30):15. [Go to]
  • Castelvecchi, D. 2007. Closer to vanishing: Bending light as a step toward invisibility cloaks. Science News 171(March 24):180. [Go to]
  • Weiss, P. 2006. Out of sight. Science News 170(July 15):42. [Go to]
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Alù, A., and E. Nader. In press. Cloaking a sensor. Physical Review Letters.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator