Advertisement

Science Friday
Blob may signal monster galaxy feeding
Body may be early galaxy caught in the act of forming
font_down font_up Text Size
access
GROWING GALAXYThis composite, false-color image is of a giant blob of glowing gas, known as a the Lyman-alpha blob, hails from a time when the universe was only 800 million years old, or 6 percent of its current age. The blob, which also contains the stellar equivalent of 40 billion suns, may be the earliest snapshot of a galaxy growing by gobbling up gas. The white bar indicates a distance of 10,000 light-years.M. Ouchi et al., Astrophysical Journal

Quick, Marge, call the Cosmic Enquirer! Astronomers have discovered a monster blob lurking at the edge of the universe. The blob may be the earliest known galaxy to be caught in the act of its first feeding frenzy.

The giant parcel of gas and stars stretches for 55,000 light-years, a little more than half the diameter of the Milky Way’s disk today. Yet this newfound object hails from a time when the universe was only 6 percent its current age.

Masami Ouchi of the Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science in Pasadena, Calif., and his colleagues first recorded light from the blob, along with 206 other remote galaxy candidates, with the infrared Subaru Telescope on Hawaii’s Mauna Kea. Spectra taken at the Keck Observatory on Mauna Kea and at the Magellan Telescope near La Serena, Chile, confirmed that the blob resides 12.9 billion light-years from Earth, making it the fourth most distant object known in the cosmos. Because peering deep into space is the same as looking far back in time, the body’s distance reveals that it dates from just 800 million years after the Big Bang.

This kind of body, dubbed a Lyman-alpha blob for the type of hydrogen emission it radiates, has never before been seen so early in the universe. In addition, infrared observations reveal that the new blob contains a stellar mass equivalent of about 40 billion suns, Ouchi and his colleagues report online (lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0807.4174) and in an upcoming Astrophysical Journal.

Because of the object’s remote distance, the researchers say they can’t be sure if the youthful, glowing object is gas heated by a supermassive black hole at the center of a galaxy, a huge filament of gas pulled toward the center of a single fledgling galaxy or a sign of the merger of two large galaxies.

But in several recent articles, theorists suggest Lyman-alpha blobs that formed when the universe was young are filaments of cold gas that fall into — and enlarge — a massive galaxy in the early universe. Simulations have shown that massive galaxies early in the universe grow bigger by snaring streams of cold intergalactic gas. In an article recently posted online, Avi Loeb and Mark Dijkstra of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass., show that these cold gas filaments are likely to appear as Lyman-alpha blobs, just like the one found by Ouchi’s team (lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0902.2999).

“In our model, such a detection implies the formation of a massive galaxy” early in the history of the cosmos, Loeb says.

Recent work by Avishai Dekel of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and his colleagues comes to a similar conclusion online (lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0901.2458) and in the Jan. 22 Nature.

As the gas streams into the center of a galaxy early in the universe, it gains gravitational energy, which heats the gas and causes it to emit Lyman-alpha radiation, Dekel says.

According to the standard model of galaxy formation, in which visible galaxies coalesce within a halo of invisible material called cold dark matter, galaxies start out small and grow bigger over time. But the model does allow a galaxy as large and massive as the object discovered with Subaru, Ouchi and his colleagues note, if the starlit body resides within an extremely massive dark matter halo, weighing the equivalent of about a trillion suns.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos
Comments 7
  • Thanks, Ron, for this story of these extremely distant LABs. There seems to be a growing amount of literature on these objects, so links to the papers was much appreciated. Perhaps the IR eye of the James Webb Space Telescope will have the resolution and sensitivity to answer questions of their nature and structure.I had already read the first paper referenced in the story. Interesting that the researchers nicknamed the object Himiko which is "the name of legendary queen in ancient Japan". Sure is a lot easier to remember than the coordinate-based designation is!
    Jon Hanford Jon Hanford
    Apr. 20, 2009 at 5:48pm
  • great article, I love reading about these discoveries
    chuck bertrand chuck bertrand
    Apr. 21, 2009 at 1:44pm
  • Space dont expanding or curving! There is no drawing force at all. There is no dark matter or dark energy at all. There is no extra dimensions at all.

    Only all a time exploding energy in space who dont change at all.

    In galaxy centre is very density exploding energyconcentration who radiate exploding energywaves who have nature of exploding atoms nucleus who radiate exploding energywaves who have a nature of exploding electrons and exploding particle if there4 coming out side some exploding energywaves who giving some change of pressure for energywaves who pushing selfs out from all a time exploding atoms nuclei!

    [Link was removed]


    .
    change of pressure change of pressure
    Apr. 22, 2009 at 11:22am
  • Suitable for two Galactic center of the huge energy of the collision early enough to relieve a lot of energy. If a collision arises, before the stars have had time to arise out of a protruding from the energy created perhaps the only gas.

    Onesimpleprinciple philosophy of the Galactic center huge big focus on energy will radiate energy waves in need of future energy that causes the pressure fluctuations, creating the stars.

    When the two giant energy of the collision is at an early stage, the energy released will not be responsible for future energy-much, and you will generate a gas which radiates energy, which brings the gas concentration would have been guided by the other huge energy mergers themselves over long distances, when a sufficiently energetic particles has not been reached towards the gas and it is through the stars does not unable to reach the birth.



    hmmm. Later some other galaxies centre giant energyconcentration mide giving some change of pressure, you know!
    change of pressure change of pressure
    Apr. 23, 2009 at 12:44pm
  • On Energy, Mass, Gravity, Galaxies Clusters, AND Life
    A Commonsensible Recapitulation


    The onset of big-bang's inflation started gravity, followed by formation of galactic clusters that behave "classically" as Newtonian bodies while continuously reconverting their shares of pre-inflation masses back to energy, and of endless intertwined evolutions WITHIN the clusters in attempts to resist this reconversion.


    A. "Heavyweight galaxies in the young universe", at

    [Link was removed]
    New observations of full-grown galaxies in the young universe may force astrophysicists to revise their leading theory of galaxy formation, at least as it applies to regions where galaxies congregate into clusters.


    B. Some brief notes in "Light On Dark Matter?", at

    [Link was removed] #entry373127

    - "Galaxy Clusters Evolved By Dispersion, Not By Conglomeration"
    - Introduction of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
    - "Dark Energy And Matter And The Emperor's New Clothes"
    - "Evolutionary Cosmology: Ordained Or Random"
    - "“Movie” Of Microwave Pulse Transitioning From Quantum To Classical Physics"
    - "Broken Symmetry" Is Physics' Term Of Biology's "Evolution"
    - "A Glimpse Of Forces-Matter-Life Unified Theory"


    C. Commonsensible conception of gravity

    1. According to the standard model, which describes all the forces in nature except gravity, all elementary particles were born massless. Interactions with the proposed Higgs field would slow down some of the particles and endow them with mass. Finding the Higgs — or proving it does not exist — has therefore become one of the most important quests in particle physics.

    However, for a commonsensible primitive mind with a commonsensible universe represented by
    E=Total[m(1 + D)], this conceptual equation describes gravity. It does not explain gravity. It describes it. It applies to the whole universe and to every and all specific cases, regardless of size.

    2. Thus gravity is simply another face of the total cosmic energy. Thus gravity is THE cosmic parent of phenomena such as black holes and life. It is the display of THE all-pervasive-embracive strained space texture, laid down by the expanding galactic clusters, also noticed within the galactic clusters in the energy backlashes into various constructs of temporary constrained energy packages.


    3. "Extrapolation of the expansion of the universe backwards in time to the early hot dense "Big Bang" phase, using general relativity, yields an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past. At age 10^-35 seconds the Universe begins with a cataclysm that generates space and time, as well as all the matter and energy the Universe will ever hold."

    At D=0, E was = m and both E and m were, together, all the energy and matter the Universe will ever hold. Since the onset of the cataclysm, E remains constant and m diminishes as D increases.
    The increase of D is the inflation, followed by expansion, of what became the galactic clusters.

    At 10^-35 seconds, D in E=Total[m(1 + D)] was already a fraction of a second above zero. This is when gravity started. This is what started gravity. At this instance starts the space texture, starts the straining of the space texture, and starts the "space texture memory", gravity, that may eventually overcome expansion and initiate re-impansion back to singularity.


    D. Commonsensible conception of the forces other than gravity

    The forces other than gravity are, commonsensibly, forces involved in conjunction with evolution within the galactic clusters:

    [Link was removed]

    The farthest we go in reductionism in Everything, including in Life, we shall still end up with wholism, until we arrive at energy. Energy is the base element of everything and of all in the universe. At the beginning was the energy singularity, at the end will be near zero mass and an infinite dispersion of the beginning energy, and in-between, the universe undergoes continuous evolution consisting of myriad energy-to-energy and energy-to-mass-to-energy transformations.

    The universe, and everything in it, are continuously evolving, and all the evolutions are intertwined.


    E. PS to "On Cosmic Energy And Mass Evolutions"

    As mass is just another face of energy it is commonsensible to regard not only life, but mass in general, as a format of temporarily constrained energy.

    It therefore ensues that whereas the expanding cosmic constructs, the galaxies clusters, are - overall - continuously converting "their" original pre-inflation mass back to energy, the overall evolution WITHIN them, within the clusters, is in the opposite direction, temporarily constrained
    energy packages such as black holes and biospheres and other energy-storing mass-formats are precariuosly forming and "doing best" to survive as long as "possible"...


    F. From "Strings Link the Ultracold with the Superhot"

    [Link was removed]

    "Perfect liquids suggest theory’s math mirrors something real.

    When the universe was very young, and still superhot from the aftermath of the Big Bang, plasma should have been the only state of matter around. And that’s what scientists at Brookhaven expected to see when they smashed gold ions together at 99.99 percent of the speed of light using a machine called RHIC (for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider). RHIC physicists thought the ion collisions would melt the gold’s protons and neutrons into a hot plasma of quarks and gluons at a temperature of a trillion kelvins, replicating conditions similar to those a microsecond after the birth of the universe. But instead of a gaslike plasma, the physicists reported in 2005, RHIC served up a hot quark soup, behaving more like a liquid than a plasma or gas."


    G. The expectation of Brookhaven scientists was a bit unrealistic

    The "aftermath of the Big Bang" lasted much less than 10^-35 seconds. This is evidenced by the fact that "Gravity Is THE Manifestation Of The Onset Of Cosmic Inflation Cataclysm":

    [Link was removed] #1950
    and
    [Link was removed] #1982

    With all respect due to the scientists at Brookhaven it is unrealistic to expect that they can recreate the state of pre big-bang energy-mass singularity. Commonsense is still the best scientific approach.


    H. PS To "Gravity Limits Link Ultracold And Superhot": Our Inability To Create Singularity

    a. From "Strings Link the Ultracold with the Superhot"

    A new truth always has to contend with many difficulties,” the German physicist Max Planck said decades ago. “If it were not so, it would have been discovered much sooner.”

    b. IMO gravity is attempted reversal of inflation

    To me, a simple uninformed one, E=mc^2 is a derived formula, whereas E=Total[m(1 + D)] is a commonsensical descriptive concept.

    I intuitively regard both the ultracold and superhot liquids as being in a confined space and "striving but unable" to overcome D, to render D=0.

    I also intuitively regard our accelerated collisions smashups as attempted "reverse inflations" in the sense that Newton's law of universal gravitation seems to me as "reverse inflation".


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Life's Manifest
    [Link was removed] #578
    EVOLUTION Beyond Darwin 200
    [Link was removed] #entry396201
    [Link was removed] #1407
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    May. 3, 2009 at 2:25pm
  • It very far from us, why we must worry about it?
    [Link was removed]
    Tom Brian Tom Brian
    Nov. 18, 2009 at 1:10pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat
    Jan. 7, 2010 at 7:33am
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Citations & References:
seperator
  • lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0901.2458
  • lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0807.4174
  • lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0902.2999
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator