Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Obama redoubles push to improve science education
A+ A- Text Size

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: April 27, 2009

During his address to members of the National Academy of Sciences, today, President Obama outlined a number of budget and policy priorities. Key among them: boosting interest among youngsters in science and math — with an eye towards encouraging them to consider careers in allied fields. The president also pledged to improve the quality of educators that train the nation’s youth in science and math.

“We know that the nation that out-educates us today will out-compete us tomorrow,” the president said. And U.S. students no longer stand on a pedestal. They have fallen behind their peers in Singapore, Japan, England, the Netherlands, Hong Kong and Korea, among others, Obama noted. And in one assessment, American 15-year olds “ranked 25th in math and 21st in science when compared to other nations.

“We know that the quality of math and science teachers is the single most influential factor in determining whether a student will succeed or fail in these subjects,” he said. “Yet in high schools, more than 20 percent of students in math and more than 60 percent of students in chemistry and physics are taught by teachers without expertise in these fields.“ Moreover, Obama noted, this problem is slated to worsen substantially: “There is a projected shortfall of more than 280,000 math and science teachers across the country by 2015.”

What to do? The president pointed to one reasonably new incentive. Starting today, he said, “states making strong commitments and progress in math and science education will be eligible to compete later this fall for additional funds under the Secretary of Education’s $5 billion Race to the Top program.” Created through the Stimulus-funding package, this program rewards states that boost their academic standards, assessments, curricula and partnerships with outside groups.

The president also challenged schools to find better educators in math and science — individuals who will more reliably “engage students and reinvigorate those subjects.” Toward that end, he said his administration would support “inventive approaches” — such as programs that retain and reward “effective” teachers. We’ve heard that line before. Reward teachers’ performance, not attendance. Unions may not like that, but something’s clearly got to change.

Obama also called for creating “new pathways for experienced professionals to go into the classroom. There are right now chemists who could teach chemistry, physicists who could teach physics, statisticians who could teach mathematics.” He’s right. Only there’s more to teaching than knowing the subject matter. Subject proficiency should be a prerequisite (how novel), but knowing how to communicate effectively should also be a minimum requirement. And as we all know, many good scientists aren’t patient, don’t have good communication skills, and/or don’t know how to motivate headstrong adolescents with everything on their mind but chemistry, physics and math.

In fact, Obama seems to recognize this too. Which is why he recommended that scientists and educators encourage students “to get a degree in science fields and a teaching certificate at the same time.”

In today's address, the president also challenged researchers to visit classrooms throughout the nation so that more students could understand the role of science and engineering in shaping the world — their iPod-driven, texting oriented, Facebook-dominated environment — and witness the “enthusiasm” of researchers that led to these and other elements of everyday life.

The new administration has also set a goal to enhance the United States’ ability to compete for high-wage, high-tech jobs and to foster the next generation’s best scientists and engineers. By 2020, the president pledged, “America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.” Tax credits and grants will be there to “make a college education more affordable,” he added.

The president’s new budget would also triple the number of National Science Foundation research fellowships to graduate students. (Really huge applause.) Obama noted that this program was created a half-century ago as part of the space race. However, in the succeeding years, its size has changed little, despite the skyrocketing number of students now available to benefit from them.

Federal investments can do a lot to revamp the nation’s flagging research and education enterprises. But there’s also plenty that money can’t buy, the president told research dignitaries in the room. “So today I want to challenge you to use your love and knowledge of science to spark the same sense of wonder and excitement in a new generation.”

Other highlights of the President’s address today included several other recycled themes, such as:

1) the decision to make new programs that produce, use and save energy the #1 priority for federal investments in innovation. Indeed, Obama noted, that’s one reason “why we put a scientist in charge of the Department of Energy.” That scientist, Nobel physicist Steven Chu, was sitting in the audience and won a huge round of applause.

2) The Obama administration is in the process of working to put a market-based cap on carbon emissions. Big business is not a fan of this proposal, Congress is learning. I guess the carbon cap-and-trade proposal was highlighted in hopes of getting the science community to help lobby for its adoption.

3) And on March 9, the president noted, he signed an executive memo pledging that “the days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over.” The president noted that his new science adviser has been tasked with making sure that in future “facts are driving scientific decisions, not the other way around.” Amen to that.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • To me, this post strikes gold. For the longest time my family and friends have been laughing at me and I myself have been struggling with my "multi-directional career path": I am currently studying science in college, and always knew that I had to do something afterwards, but was never sure if that something would be grad school, med school, teacher's college, or journalism school (for science journalism, naturally) - I'm beginning to see that there is profit in doing more than one of those things. Thanks Janet again. You are awesome.
    Zoe C Zoe C
    Apr. 27, 2009 at 8:34pm
  • Thanks for this post! It was great! Anyway,despite of the news that the economy had somewhat recovered from the recession that hit the USA, many people are still out of job. Well, the Post Grad movie reviews haven't exactly been glowing. Most Post Grad movie reviews glowingly praise Alexis Bedel. The film is about a woman who graduates from college during a recession, and has to move back in with her parents, and begins scheming how to land her dream job, and stick it to her nemesis from her college days. The film also has the obligatory love triangle where a friend has an unrequited crush on her. Bledel is most well known for her role in Gilmore Girls, as the daughter, and has blossomed into an aspiring actress. The plot seems trite, but maybe the film is worth cash now to see, and the Post Grad movie reviews are wrong. Visit this site to read more: [Link was removed]
    Minnie M Minnie M
    Aug. 22, 2009 at 5:58am
  • Genetic disorders are often caused by sperm DNA that has double strand breaks, copy number variations, point mutations and imprinting mutations that have to do with advancing paternal age. Men need to know about their biological clock and father babies in their 20s and very early



    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    iSo AsTaLaViSTa iSo AsTaLaViSTa
    Dec. 26, 2009 at 10:10pm
  • Thank you administrator...
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    Science News Science News
    Jan. 14, 2010 at 7:30pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us