Advertisement

Science Friday
Swine flu outbreak likely to continue, officials say
As numbers rise daily, the mechanism of the virus remains shrouded
Web edition : Monday, April 27th, 2009
font_down font_up Text Size

Even as public health data on the new swine flu outbreak pour in, the biological mechanism by which the virus sickens people remains poorly understood, scientists say.

Forty cases of swine flu have been confirmed in five U.S. states, says Richard Besser, acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. But only one U.S. case has led to hospitalization, and no one in the United States has died. The cases appeared in New York, Texas, Kansas, Ohio and California, Besser said at a news briefing on April 27.

In contrast, hundreds of people have reportedly fallen ill in Mexico and a reported 149 have died from what is apparently the same strain of swine flu. Some reports put the mortality number much higher.

Also on Monday, reports emerged suggesting that swine flu cases have turned up in Britain, Canada, New Zealand and France.

The CDC advised against nonessential travel to Mexico and has taken the precautionary measure of making one-fourth of its strategic stockpile of antiviral flu drugs, or 11 million courses, available. But the drugs must be taken within the first 48 hours of the appearance of symptoms to be effective.

Meanwhile, the virus causing this concern remains something of a mystery.

“What are the biological properties that this virus really possesses when it comes to causing human disease?” asks Andrew Pekosz, a virologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. With the starkly different death reports in Mexico and the United States, he says, “we’re getting two different stories on how dangerous it is.”

Scientists have recently deciphered the virus’s main components and found that it contains genetic material from swine, birds and humans. But it remains unknown how this combination would render it particularly lethal, if it does.

Every influenza virus has on its surface two types of proteins, hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, which also occur in different varieties designated by number. The current swine flu is caused by an H1N1 virus, and an H1N1 is common among flu in people. But the hemagglutinin protein typically seen in human flu viruses is a human version, whereas the H1 in the current swine flu comes from a pig flu strain. The virus therefore might cause a strong reaction in the human body and severe symptoms, Pekosz speculates.

Scott Wetterhall, an epidemiologist at the Atlanta office of RTI International, a research institute, says that until the biological properties of the virus are better understood, public health officials faced with an outbreak will turn to four actions to mitigate it, some of which Mexico has taken. These include limiting interpersonal contact, closing schools, canceling social events and quarantining people who are ill or suspected of being exposed.

There is hope that the timing of the outbreak might limit its impact. “We’re nearing the end of the season in which flu viruses tend to transmit very easily,” Besser said at the briefing. But he also sounded a somber note: “We don’t think any of the existing vaccines are effective” against this strain. “I want you to understand, we view this as a marathon. We do think that this will continue to spread.”


Found in: Biology and Biomedicine
Comments 6
  • The present state of preparedness for a pandemic caused by pigs, birds and other animals is wholly inadequate and if a pandemic happened today, hundreds of millions would undoubtedly perish.

    Pigs are one of the closest matches to humans. That is why we use their organs for human transplantation operations. Therefore the mutation from pig influenza to human influenza, is probably the most dangerous of all due to the nearness of match.

    The link between pig and human influenza has been known for a long time. Two important studies are Evolutionary pathways of N2 neuraminidases of swine and human influenza A Virus: origin of the neuraminidase genes of two reassortants (H1N2) isolate from pigs by Kuniaki Nerome et al, National Institute of Health, Japan – Journal of General Virology (1991), 72, 693-698/ and /Ito T, Couceiro JN, Kelm S, et al. Molecular basis for the generation in pigs of influenza A viruses with pandemic potential. J Virol 1998; 72:736773.

    The problem with the present strategy is that it is predominantly targeted and dependent upon at a drug cure which is a totally false strategy. There are two main reasons for this.

    1. Flu viruses are constantly remodelling themselves and where when a
    new strain occurs, like the present state in Mexico, it will take
    6 months to develop a drug to combat it. It has to be noted that
    the Spanish flu (swine flu) that killed between 20 million and 100 million
    nearly 100 years ago (there is no definitive statistic in this
    respect as in 1918 the analysis was rudimentary, but where modern
    pandemic statisticians estimate that it was somewhere between the
    two huge figures), did its worst in the first 26 weeks. Therefore
    an antidote would be a fool’s way of solving the problem.
    2. Distribution of any new antidote would be a problem of enormous
    proportions and all affected would be dead by the time it got to them.

    Therefore the present strategy is futile.
    But unfortunately now again, Tamiflu is in 99% of flu types, not resistant against the viruses.
    I cite only a few points of information that confirm this fact.

    (i) HONG KONG(Reuters) -- A strain of the H5N1 avian influenza virus that may unleash the next global flu pandemic is showing resistance to Tamiflu, the antiviral drug that countries around the world are now stockpiling to fend off the looming threat. Experts in Hong Kong said on Friday [30 Sep 2005] that the human H5N1 strain which surfaced in northern Viet Nam this year had proved to be resistant to Tamiflu, a powerful antiviral drug. – Reuters, 30 September 2005

    (ii) U.S. health authorities (Center for Disease Control & Prevention) alerted doctors Friday that a prevalent strain of the flu is resistant to Roche Holding AG's Tamiflu antiviral drug – Wall Street Journal: Health (December 19,2008).

    (iii) Virtually all the dominant strain of flu in the United States this season is resistant to the leading antiviral drug Tamiflu…This season, 99 percent do… If a Tamiflu-resistant strain is suspected, the disease control agency suggests using a similar drug, Relenza. But Relenza is harder to take; it is a powder that must be inhaled and can cause lung spasms, and it is not recommended for children under 7…Relenza, made by GlaxoSmithKline, is known generically as zanamivir. Tamiflu, made by Roche, is known generically as oseltamivir… – The New York Times: Health (January 8, 2009).

    (iv) Tamiflu found to be 99% ineffective against primary flu strain – USA Today (January 8, 2009).
    (v) There is no provision for a vaccine for swine flu and it will take at least six months to identify, produce and manufacture a vaccine in large enough quantities. This was the statement by Dr Iain Stephenson, a consultant in Infectious Diseases at the University of Leicester who has just completed successful research on a pre-pandemic vaccine for bird flu. "We are in a position where if a swine flu virus becomes a pandemic we don't currently have a vaccine for it," he said. "I think that it is unlikely there will be widespread vaccine in less than six to eight months." – Daily Telegraph, 27 April 2009

    (vi) Dr Ian Barr, from the WHO Influenza Center in Melbourne, said it was unlikely any existing vaccines would be effective against the new swine flu strain. – China View, 27 April 2009

    There are only two modern-day drugs supposed to save human life from any pandemic. These are Relenza and Tamiflu as stated above. But both are ineffective (more-or-less totally ineffective in the case of Tamiflu) in certain areas when dealing with new strains. Unfortunately zanamivir (Relenza) is less active against influenza A/N2 neuraminidases (found in Pigs etc). For zanamivir is inhibitory for only certain influenza A neuraminidase variants but not A/N2 neuraminidases.

    There are also some nasty side-effects with Tamiflu –
    [Link was removed] +usa+today+tamilflu+april+2009&cd=8&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

    Both these drugs have to be taken within 48hrs of infection, but where the prerequisite is that the host body has to be strong against infections at the time of the start of the dosage for survival (common sense really). After 48 hours, both become increasingly useless according to medical scientists working at the coal-face around the world. Therefore the question is, how does anyone identify that they have flu quick enough and get a dose within 48 hours ? For fully identified symptoms can take several days to raise their ugly head. Indeed, medical advice is to stay at home if you think that you have flu and to not visit surgeries. This means any flu infected people will have to wait until the doctor or nurse visits with medication. In proportion though, there are few doctors and nurses compared to the population and therefore if a pandemic happened, few would receive medication in time.

    Therefore for all the above reasons an international and national strategy based upon a drugs solution is not the answer and where if we continue to pursue this as our primary strategy, there is no doubt that eventually more people will die than has ever been witnessed before in the history of humankind, and potentially over a billion people.

    Considering these true facts we have to look at the ‘source’ and therefore not fight the war on the grounds of trying to find a drug solution that will never happen in time. This is common sense and governments should not be pursuing such a basically useless strategy to nowhere.

    For this alternative strategy (the only one that will really work) we have to look at how animal flu jumps into humans.
    In this respect there are predominantly two main reasons how killer flu spreads like this.
    (a) In Asia, Mexico and the major rural areas of the world we are talking about cultures where a lot of roosters are used for cock fighting. It is very possible for those handling the roosters to get scratched and pecked with a little break in the skin which leads to bleeding. That's one way they get infected.

    (b) Another way is that it is very common for villagers in these developing countries to have roosters, chickens and pigs (their livestock) tied up or running around freely. A lot of houses are on stilts and the pigs and poultry are tied up under the house. During cold tropical evenings it is also common to see people sleeping in hammocks, or whatever they use as beds, outside amongst the pigs and the poultry. This is very common.

    Therefore the world’s resources should primarily be addressing good farm husbandry around the world and not a drug solution, but where it has to be said that the extremely powerful pharmaceutical company lobby group, do not want this. The reason, both Tamiflu and Relenza have realised for the multinational drug firms, billions upon billions of revenues. It is therefore about time that human life was placed above corporate profits and where in this case, it is fundamental to the survival of a large proportion of the human population.

    Dr David Hill
    World Innovation Foundation Charity
    Bern, Switzerland

    Ps. For anyone interested, one of the best websites for unbiased and independent information is
    [Link was removed] +bird+flu+by+dr+michael&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk
    david hill david hill
    Apr. 28, 2009 at 7:05am
  • Having traveled from the UK to Turkey in this summer, the Turkish government are imposing restrictions on travelers with flu like symptoms and refusing entry. I can see this being adopted throughout Europe.
    [Link was removed]
    Brice Jones Brice Jones
    Nov. 22, 2009 at 1:13pm
  • I have tried to be extra careful this year to hopefully avoid catching the swine flu, however it can be scary when traveling by airplane. I couldn't imagine being refused entry back to my home country if I was showing symptoms...
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    Kristin Schultz Kristin Schultz
    Dec. 16, 2009 at 11:09pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat2 m9bnat m9bnat2
    Jan. 9, 2010 at 4:39pm
  • I cant believe that there are people who actually believe that this "swine flu" was NOT man made. Just like AID this thing was designed to kill us all. Problem is, it failed to do what they thought they could do and that is too kill of many people.

    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    June Holland June Holland
    Jan. 11, 2010 at 4:28am
  • I worry more about the flu vaccines that they plan to give us. I hope i dont have to suffer this horrible flu as i know its very debilatating illness



    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    david brigs david brigs
    Jan. 18, 2010 at 2:33pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator