Advertisement

Science Friday
Most distant known object in the universe
Gamma-ray burst goes the cosmic distance
Web edition : Tuesday, April 28th, 2009
font_down font_up Text Size
access
DISTANT BURSTThe newly found gamma-ray burst GRB 090423 (infrared afterglow shown in circle) is the most distant object known in the universe.IMAGE CREDIT: D. Fox and A. Cucchiara/Penn State Univ., E. Berger/Harvard Univ., Gemini Observatory, NSF, AURA

Astronomers have identified a new record holder for most distant object in the universe — a gamma-ray burst emanating from a region 13.035 billion light-years from Earth.

On April 23, NASA’s Swift satellite discovered the burst — a 10-second flash of highly energetic radiation believed to mark the explosive collapse of a massive star into a black hole. Within three hours of Swift’s detection, astronomers recorded the burst’s infrared afterglow using the U.K. Infra-Red Telescope and the Gemini North Telescope, both on Hawaii’s Mauna Kea. Those observations, reported online (gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/gcn3_archive.html), suggested that the explosion ignited when the 13.7-billion-year-old universe was only about 630 million years old.

Because of the universe’s expansion, objects farther from Earth recede faster than closer ones, causing the light they emit to appear shifted to redder, or longer, wavelengths. Spectra taken by Nial Tanvir of the University of Leicester in England and his colleagues confirmed that the burst, dubbed GRB 090423, has a record-breaking redshift of 8.2. The previous distance record holder, a remote galaxy, had a redshift of 6.96, indicating that it resides 12.9 billion light-years from Earth.

The burst’s remote location means that the light from its afterglow, which can last for days or months, can be used as a searchlight to probe some of the earliest galaxies in the universe.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos
Comments 7
  • Really, 13.035 billion light-years from Earth is wrong calculation of the distance.
    Todays relativistic dogma approves the limit of our Universe dictated by Big Bang myth occured ostensibly 13.7
    billion years ago.
    Actually the Universe is eternal and infinite system.
    Hubble red shift determines by aging of light according exponential formula.
    See a paper about 434 supernovae study [Link was removed]
    The distance till any deep-space explosive object may be determine by comparison travel time for different frequency of EM-waves.
    See the method of measurement distances in a paper [Link was removed]
    More information available on our site [Link was removed]

    Dr. K. Khaidarov, Bourabai Research Institution, Kazakhstan

    Karim Khaidarov Karim Khaidarov
    Apr. 29, 2009 at 1:19am
  • I agree with Dr. Khaidarov that this information is being badly mis-interpreted.
    But I disagree on the direction of truth. The universe is only a few thousand years old, I believe.

    Come and discuss this, along with all origins related issues, at Talk About Origins:
    [Link was removed]
    AmPat AmPat
    Apr. 29, 2009 at 7:14am
  • Let me try that link again -
    [Link was removed]
    AmPat AmPat
    Apr. 29, 2009 at 7:15am
  • AmPat, this is Science News, not Dolt news.Why do you insist on reading information that clearly blasphemes your belief system? Go stone someone for eating pork.
    William Bailey William Bailey
    Apr. 29, 2009 at 9:56am
  • Several thoughts
    1. Difficult as it is to conceive of space without end it is even more difficult to conceive of space with and end for what could be beyond that end except space.
    2. The known universe, the universe as we now see and know it, occupies that space that to which it has grown. It is, yet, inconceivable that the universe will stop expanding unless some unknown force or "physical limt" hinders the expansion then the universe contracts and eventually begins again. Space has no known limit.
    3. To conceive of this island earth and the known universe being but a few thousand years of age is, too me, but to ignore physical reality.

    J. Knight
    John Knight John Knight
    Apr. 30, 2009 at 5:23am
  • AMPat and Khaidarov: I believe that most of us who are reading Science News are not seeking a belief system here. We are interested in what Man has been able to learn through the Scientific Process. I do not expect Man to have a perfect understanding of the Universe now or ever. It is the wonder and discovery of what our finest scientific minds can figure out, through the Scientific Process, that I love to enjoy. To paraphrase one of the 20th centuries greatest scientists, perhaps the most amazing thing about the universe is that we are actually able to learn to understand it.
    Collins Gittings Collins Gittings
    Sep. 27, 2009 at 1:11pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat2 m9bnat m9bnat2
    Jan. 9, 2010 at 4:34pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator