Advertisement

Science Friday
For blood stem cells, the force is strong
Blood flow, nitric oxide boost production of stem cells
font_down font_up Text Size

Blood stem cells grow with the flow, two new studies show.

The studies, led by independent groups at Children’s Hospital Boston, report that an embryo’s heartbeat and blood circulation stimulate the growth of blood stem cells.

The discovery could be a boon to researchers seeking to make blood stem cells for people with blood cancers, immune system disorders and other diseases that require bone marrow transplants. In children and adults, blood stem cells reside in the bone marrow. Only about a third of patients who require bone marrow transplants have matching donors.

“Basically we cannot offer optimal therapy to two-thirds of patients,” says Leonard Zon, director of the Stem Cell Program at Children’s Hospital Boston, and a coauthor of one of the new studies, which appears online May 13 and in the May 15 Cell.

Scientists can make red and white blood cells easily in the laboratory, but bone marrow patients need blood stem cells to constantly replenish their blood supply. Producing these cells, also called hematopoietic stem cells, is much more difficult, Zon says.

Now, his group suggests that a little force can boost blood stem cell production in zebrafish embryos. Reporting online May 13 in Nature, a group led by George Daley, director of the Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation Program at Children’s Hospital Boston, demonstrates that blood flow also triggers hematopoietic stem cell production in mouse embryos. Both groups found nitric oxide plays an important role.

Daley’s group directly tested the ability of blood flow to turn cells into hematopoietic stem cells. The team placed mouse embryonic stem cells in a centrifuge-like device that mimics shear stress — the frictional force blood creates when it flows over cells — in a mouse’s aorta. In early embryos, blood stem cells first form on the floor of the aorta. Later in development, they migrate to the bone marrow.

Embryonic stem cells exposed to the same magnitude of shear stress as found in the mouse aorta produced hematopoietic stem cells. Cells that were exposed to a different magnitude of shear stress, such as that in the human aorta, did not.

A nitric oxide–blocking drug reduced the number of blood stem cells induced by the shear stress. Nitric oxide is a chemical produced naturally in the body and is known to be important in regulating blood vessel growth and elasticity.

When the researchers gave the nitric oxide–blocker to pregnant mice, their embryos also had problems making blood stem cells.

Zon’s team used zebrafish embryos, which are transparent, to watch the stem cells develop. He and his colleagues found that chemicals that increase blood flow in the tails of zebrafish embryos also boost activity of the RUNX1 gene, a master regulator of blood stem cells. Mutant embryos that don’t have a heartbeat because of a defect in a heart muscle protein don’t make hematopoietic stem cells in their tails.

When the researchers gave a nitric oxide compound to the mutant embryos, however, the embryos produced more blood stem cells. The nitric oxide–blocker also inhibited blood stem cell production, the researchers found. Those findings suggest that blood flow may increase nitric oxide levels, which then boost stem cell production, Zon says.

Intuitively, scientists might expect that mechanical forces play a role in shaping development, but few biologists have studied this due to experimental difficulties, says Ihor Lemischka, a stem cell biologist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City.

“I think we’ll be seeing more of these types of studies,” Lemischka says.

It’s still not clear how the cells sense shear stress, and researchers are trying to unravel the chain of events between mechanical force and stem cell production in order to manipulate the process to make blood stem cells for transplant.


Found in: Body & Brain and Genes & Cells
Comments 11
  • Over 100 years ago, a Russian histologist suggested stem cells be applied for scientific research.

    They are the human body’s equivalent of a generator, as they can renew, regenerate, and replicate under the right conditions.

    The apex of cellular therapy and regenerative/reparative medicine has been reborn after an 8 year moratorium that basically halted federal funding for stem cell research with most states in the U.S.

    Now the NIH can award grants to scientists involved with biomedical research involving stem cell therapy through the CMS to each state in the U.S.

    While never banned, stem cell research had limited funding during this time. And this was unfortunate, because there are several likely uses of stem cells.

    These uses include the replacement of tissues in the human body, as well as repairing cell types that are defective.

    Also, stem cells can deliver genetic therapies that are needed in certain patients.

    ESCs are totiplotent if obtained from the morula which is a pre-blastocyst stage. Normally, the stem cells are acquired from the blastocyst itself.

    From this source, the stem cells can be any cell in the human body except for the placenta, and are pluripotent.

    Embryonic stem cells are obtained from a 4 day old embryo called a blastocyst, and are pluripotent from this source.

    The blastocyst contains about 100 cells, and is not suitable at this stage for implantation into the uterine wall.

    The inner core of the blastocyst has about 20 cells, and this is where stem cells are obtained.

    These cells are unspecialized cells that can be developed or morphed into the over 200 cells available in the human body through differentiation, as ESCs are undifferentiated by nature.

    As such, they can become any human cell, as long as they are prevented from clumping or crowding together when explanted into cultures as they are propagated. After stem cells are cultured, they are moved to what are called stem lines.

    Until recently, ESCs were believed to be most beneficial instead of the adult stem cell alternative (ASC), as these stem cells are limited to application to the tissue the stem cells were obtained from only.

    However ASCs (somatic stem cells) now can be coerced into differentiation through plasticity (trans-differentiation).

    This likely will reduce if not eliminate those opposed to stem cell therapy because of moral and ethical reasons related to the utilization of ESCs.

    Thanks to molecular biology, four transcription factors control the transfer of genetic information from DNA to RNAS to regulate gene expression. So ASCs can have the same beneficial qualities as ESCs.

    In the past, viral vectors and exotic genes interfered with the purity of ASCs. Now ASCs are re-programmed using plasmids instead of viruses and oncogenes that can become detrimental for the patient treated.

    So now, ASCs can safely become induced pluripotent cells with the same potential as ESCs. As a result, the ASCs are free of genetic artifacts that potentially can interfere with transgene sequences.

    They are capable of, and are able to renew and reproduce with minimal effort, stem cells, under the right laboratory conditions.

    Human blood can be reproduced with stem cells under the right conditions, it has been shown by researchers.

    SCT can also be used to investigate disease states for better treatment options.

    Disease-specific stem cell lines, which are those cells that are pluripotent and are created with the same genetic errors of certain diseases, are studied for this reason.

    So there clearly is a huge potential for stem cell-based therapies. The first FDA approved clinical trial occurred early in 2009.

    This human trial will involve evaluating primarily the safety of ESCs designed to be used as treatment for spinal cord injury patients. The trial was submitted by Geron Corp.

    Pfizer, the largest drug company, has implemented stem cell research, as they are an asset to drug discovery by creating within the organization a regenerative medicine unit.

    Other large pharma companies are implemented similar research protocols for the same reasons.

    Geron Corp. in California is the world’s leading esc developer, and financed researchers at Univ. of Wisconsin, who isolated the first human esc in 1998.

    Stem cell therapy potentially can cure multiple sclerosis, among other disases and those with damaged human tissue.

    The therapy prevents the advancement of disease, as well as reverses the neurological dysfunctions associated with MS. Patients are injected with their own stem cells obtained from their bone marrow, which are called haemopoietic stem cells.

    These particular stem cells are the origin of all blood cells. Further large clinical trials are needed to support these results. Studies have shown between 70 and 80 percent of MS patients who received stem cell therapy did not relapse afterwards.

    Allogenic, or donor transplants, have a risk of graft versus host disease. Autologous, which is the patient’s own stem cells, are preferable and most beneficial.

    Similar results from this autologous bone marrow transplant cellular therapy are seen with Chron’s disease as well.

    During the procedure, the immune system is reset so it is not in an autoimmune state where it attacks the human body. The process lasts about 2 months, and consists of 6phases:

    1. Initial chemo
    2. Release of stem cells
    3. Acquisition of stem cells
    4. Cells are then frozen until ready for transplant
    5. Second chemo to reduce leukocytes
    6. Autologous stem-cell transplant. Immune system is reset.

    Positive results from stem cell therapy are seen usually within a month, and patients can request another treatment about 6 months after the first treatment presently.

    This stem cell paradigm of therapy addresses the etiology of a disease state, instead of focusing on the symptoms only. As such, this is the practice of regenerative medicine with the implementation of SCT.

    Some believe ethical restraints are needed regarding the use of ESCs for therapeutic reasons. Yet they improve the quality of life of those with devastating diseases which involves suffering without any relief.

    So stem cell therapy and research may be the most right and ethical thing to do for such patients. Not only is the tremedous suffering relieved with those possessed with devistating diseases, their functional ability is restored for those who receive stem cell therapy.

    Embryos are acquired from fertility clinics (IVFs) that have thousands routinely stored and are abnormally fertilized. This means that they could never go on to become a human, and would be destroyed otherwise.

    Ironically, one could argue it is inappropriate to discard what may be valuable and ethical for others, potentially.

    Most couples with frozen embryos would gladly give them to such research, surveys have concluded.

    These embryos are believed by many to not be morally equivalent to human life, but only have the potential for life. And they are used for therapeutic cloning, known as somatic cell nuclear transfer, and not reproductive cloning.

    Ten states have banned this cloning out of ignorance, it seems. Bioethic principles, which are beneficience, or physician-centered decisions, as well as non-maleficence, which is first do no harm, are not corrupted.

    Furthermore, autonomy, which is the patient’s right to determine their health, and justice or fairness remain intact.

    Stem cells should be utilized for those terminally ill as well, many believe. Many are seeking stem cell therapy overseas due to restrictions that exist in the U.S. presently. The United Kingdom is believed to be the leader in stem cell research presently.

    Dan Abshear
    Dan Abshear Dan Abshear
    May. 14, 2009 at 7:27am
  • Some time ago way back in 2004 a work along these lines show that sodium nitroprusside a nitric oxide donor can transdifferentiate lymphocytes in peripheral blood to granulocytic cell types. [Link was removed] work suggests that lymphocytes could behave like stem cells to dedifferentiate and differentiate to other cells of blood.
    jags jags
    May. 18, 2009 at 12:44pm
  • Genostemness Induction
    More On The Lifehood Of Genes
    that makes each and all organisms alive


    A. Two of many examples of cells' pluripotency, genostemness, induction

    - "For blood stem cells, the force is strong"
    [Link was removed]
    Blood flow boosts production of blood stem cells, two new studies show.

    - "New study yields clue to how stem cells form" and "Who-What Is The Stemness In Stem Cells"
    [Link was removed]


    B. Again, re the stemness in stem cells

    Stemness, pluripotency, is an innate capability-property of the stem-genome. There are no "genes that confer stemness properties" on innate-fresh stem genomes, not-yet task-expression-committed genomes.

    Both the genome and its communal genes membership are organisms. Plain and simple and obviously commonsensical. In order to recover pluripotency by an already task-committed genome it is necesary to unccommit it.


    C. "Genes to Genomes to Monocellular Organisms to Multicellular Organisms"
    [Link was removed]

    Now we can appreciate the fractal nature of life's evolution. It is ever-continuous ever-enhanced ever-complexed cooperation. Now we can understand why, and grosso modo how, the organs and processes and signals found in multicelled organisms have their historical origins in the life-cultures of monocells communities. And this includes modifying shape of monocells community in response to changed circumstances, functions of serotonin and melatonin and, yes, the evolution of neural cells and the neural systems with their intricate outer-membrane shapes and functions and their high energy consumption requirements.

    And this includes also production of fresh genostem cells in monocells communities, in response to arising community needs. And this includes also a variety of means and mechanisms within cells community involved from sensing a need of fresh genostemcells through producing them and directing them to target locations where they are needed and committing them to the specific tasks in response to the new need.


    D. In natural life gene's expressions and their modifications are evolutionary matters

    Change of expression is driven by feedback from the dynamics of the culture (mode of behaviour) of their cells community, dictated and directed, selected, by their environmental circumstances. This, of course, is the base fractal rung of the ladder of Darwinian evolution. And this is so because genes are plainly organisms.


    E. Why Pavlov smiled in 2008

    [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]

    Pavlov demonstrated effecting placebo phenomena in multicelled organisms by manipulation of their drives-reactions. Now placebo and imagination phenomena are demonstrated also in Life's primal organisms, in genes and genomes, in our first stratum and 2nd stratum base organisms. A very good reason for him to smile. What makes this possible? It is possible simply since these are, too, organisms.


    F. So, if it is not the lifehood of genes that makes each and all organisms alive,

    what otherwise makes each and all organisms alive?


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Updated Life's Manifest May 2009
    [Link was removed] #entry412704
    [Link was removed] #2321
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    May. 23, 2009 at 3:13pm
  • What will happen to our genetic code over ONE MILLION YEARS?

    [Link was removed]
    Mike Mathiesen Mike Mathiesen
    Jun. 6, 2009 at 12:20pm
  • More on the lifehood of genes:

    Science Blindness To Gene's Lifehood


    A. From "Better sensing through empty receptors"

    [Link was removed]

    A new model suggests cells may be more sensitive to their environment than previously thought.

    This work deals with the mechanism and efficiency of some components of the sensing system on a monocell organism's outer membrane. It refers to

    - cells may benefit...
    - how a cell sorts information...
    - single-celled organisms, such as bacteria and yeast, must accurately judge their landscape to find food and avoid trouble.


    B. From "Bacterium With Chemoreceptors Versus Multicelled Organisms"

    [Link was removed] #3489

    From sensing to signalling to tumbling to re-swimming. This goes on in a bacterial cell. Who and how assesses the information and draws and issues instructions?


    C. 21st Century Science Is Still Blind To Gene's Lifehood

    This blindness is one of the hallmarks of the scientifically decadent corrupt still ongoing 20th century technology culture.


    D. Cells are just the functional housings of the organisms genes-genome

    Nature evolved genes to constrain energy as long as possible and to replicate for augmenting the amount of constrained energy.

    Genes evolved the capability and technique first to adapt and later to manipulate their environments by means of their expressions. Their expressions handle everything for the genes, from sensing to remembering to signaling through foraging through all components of surviving. Each and all of their expressions are targeted for augmented constrained energy survival.

    Is this so difficult to notice and accept scientifically?

    It seems that mundane scientific decadence blinds 21st century science to the lifehood of genes.


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Updated Life's Manifest May 2009
    [Link was removed] #2321
    Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
    [Link was removed] #3108

    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Oct. 4, 2009 at 11:09am
  • Genetic disorders are often caused by sperm DNA that has double strand breaks, copy number variations, point mutations and imprinting mutations that have to do with advancing paternal age. Men need to know about their biological clock and father babies in their 20s and very early



    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    iSo AsTaLaViSTa iSo AsTaLaViSTa
    Dec. 26, 2009 at 9:55pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat2 m9bnat m9bnat2
    Jan. 7, 2010 at 1:47pm
  • i have heard that stem cells are not good for humans health



    [Link was removed]
    sonny4tr sonny4tr
    Jan. 20, 2010 at 8:01am
  • the stem cells are good for human health



    [Link was removed]
    vannesart4 vannesart4
    Jan. 20, 2010 at 8:24am
  • i was waiting for so many days to know about the stem cells



    [Link was removed]
    seasonr4e seasonr4e
    Jan. 20, 2010 at 12:49pm
  • i guess it advantages as well as disadvantages


    [Link was removed]
    byron47u byron47u
    Jan. 20, 2010 at 1:00pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Citations & References:
seperator
  • North, T.E., W. Goessling, et al. 2009. Hematopoietic stem cell development is dependent on blood flow. Cell 137(May 15):736-748. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.023
  • Adamo, L., O. Naveiras, et al. In press. Biomechanical forces promote embryonic Haematopoiesis. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature08073
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator