Advertisement

Science Friday
Cultivation changed monsoon in Asia
Loss of forests in India, China during the 1700s led to a decline in monsoon precipitation
Web edition : Monday, June 1st, 2009
font_down font_up Text Size

The dramatic expansion of agriculture in India and southeastern China during the 18th century — a sprawl that took place at the expense of forests — triggered a substantial drop in precipitation in those regions, a new study suggests.

Winds that blow northeast from the Indian Ocean into southern Asia each summer bring abundant rain to an area that’s home to more than half the world’s population. But those seasonal winds, known as monsoons, brought about 20 percent less rainfall each year to India and southeastern China in the 1850s than they did in the early 1700s, says Kazuyuki Saito, a climate scientist at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. That decline, he and his colleagues contend online June 1 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is the result of deforestation in the region.

In 1700, forests covered between 40 and 50 percent of India and China. But by 1850 that proportion had shrunk to between 5 and 10 percent, Saito says. The substantial decline in forests dramatically reduced the amount of moisture pulled from deep in the soil and sent skyward by trees — moisture that typically would have joined that present in the monsoon winds flowing from the ocean. The overall reduction in moisture, in turn, triggered a substantial slump in soil-dampening precipitation, the researchers note.

Western India, for example, received 20 centimeters (7.9 inches) less monsoon rainfall in 1850 than it did in 1700. The resulting drop in atmospheric humidity also led to a decline in cloud cover, which boosted heat at ground level and dried surface soil even further.

In their study, Saito and his colleagues used a global climate model to confirm the effect of deforestation in the region. One scenario depicted the forest coverage present in 1700, and the other included the reduced coverage present in 1850. Both simulations used month-to-month variations in sea-surface temperatures and sea ice coverage that reflect modern-day conditions. The decline in monsoon precipitation seen in the computer simulations mimicked the extent and pattern of those seen in the real world, the researchers report.

“What’s really exciting about this study is that you can rule out things such as greenhouse gases,” says Roger A. Pielke Sr., an atmospheric scientist at the University of Colorado at Boulder. The new findings “show that the climate system is more complex and less predictable than scientists had recognized.”

Many of the suspected causes of climate change probably had little to do with this drop in Asia’s monsoon precipitation, Saito and his colleagues contend.

Noteworthy changes in the atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide didn’t begin to occur until after the 1850s. Solar activity varied on its normal 11-year cycle between 1713 and 1850, but there were no apparent long-term trends in activity over that period, they note. Several major volcanic eruptions occurred during the interval, but the cooling effects triggered by any individual volcano would have lasted only a few months or years. Sea-surface temperatures didn’t exhibit any unusually large variations, the researchers add.

Together, these observations tend to pin the blame on deforestation, the researchers say.


Found in: Agriculture, Climate Change, Earth and Earth Science
Comments 2
  • You can't actually rule out greenhouse gasses here. Forests are methane producers, even though they sink carbon in biomass, tropical forests put out lots of methane which is a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. This does not invalidate this model, but it does complicate it. Anthrogenic climate change has been with mankind since the introduction of agriculture, and the subsequent rise of the city-state. Look at the deforestation around the Mediterranean, and in the Middle East, and the desertification of the Upper Sahara. Also look at the changes in Australia with the arrival of humans 40,000 years ago, as they slashed and burned the continent.
    James Boettcher James Boettcher
    Jun. 2, 2009 at 1:14am
  • James, Anthrogenic climate change did not melt the Glaciers of the ice age. As it now stand I have not seen any real reason for the glaciers to melt. How much Global heating does that take to melt a glacier a mile high??? The desert fication of the upper Sahara and mediteranian was the result of the "END" final melt water form the Great Lakes following into the North Atlantic instead of the Gulf of Mexico. when the Glacier waters ended the deep sea atlantic conveyor started up again and the low pressure started up farther north. Study some earth science!
    john zilka john zilka
    Jun. 8, 2009 at 4:13pm
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Perkins, S. 2005. Volcanic suppression: Major eruptions can reduce sea level. Science News 168(Nov. 5):294. [Go to]
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Takata, K., K. Saito, and T. Yasunari. In press. Changes in the Asian monsoon during 1700-1850 induced by preindustrial cultivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator