Advertisement

Science Friday
Betelgeuse shrinks
The red supergiant has lost 15 percent of its size
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Shrinking giantThis ultraviolet image of the red supergiant star Betelgeuse was taken in 1996 with the Hubble Space Telescope. New infrared observations with a ground-based interferometer now reveal that the star's diameter has mysteriously shrunk by more than 15 percent over the past 15 years.Andrea Dupree/Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, Ronald Gilliland/STScI, NASA, ESA

PASADENA, Calif. — Betelgeuse, one of the brightest stars visible to the naked eye, has shrunk in diameter by more than 15 percent since 1993.

The star, a red supergiant, has a radius exceeding the distance between the sun and Jupiter. The shrinkage corresponds to the star contracting by a distance equal to that between Venus and the sun, researchers reported June 9 at an American Astronomical Society meeting and in the June 1 Astrophysical Journal Letters.

No other red supergiant has shown such a dramatic contraction, though others stars known as Mira variables routinely contract or expand by an even greater amount in a single year.

access
Star trackerPhysicist Charles Townes cleans one of the mirrors of the infrared spatial interferometer that he and colleagues have used to monitor Betelgeuse since 1993.C. Ryan

It’s unclear why Betelgeuse has shrunk and whether the star will later rebound, said Charles Townes, a retired professor from the University of California, Berkeley who won the 1964 Nobel Prize in physics.

Townes and collaborator Edward Wishnow, also of UC Berkeley, used an infrared interferometer, consisting of three telescopes acting as a single unit, atop Mt. Wilson in southern California to monitor the star. The team examined the star at an infrared wavelength of 11.1 micrometers, which can penetrate the tenuous gas and dust in the star’s outer regions and accurately determine the star’s visible edge.

In 1921, Betelgeuse became the first star for which astronomers measured a size. Over the years, different interferometers, observing Betelgeuse over a wide range of wavelengths, have recorded diameters for the star that disagree with each other by as much as 30 percent. That’s not surprising because stars often look considerably bigger or smaller at different wavelengths. But the star hasn’t previously been found to vary significantly in size at any one wavelength, Townes says.

As hefty as 15 suns, Betelgeuse is nearing the end of its life and could soon go supernova. Continued close monitoring of Betelgeuse could lead to a better understanding of the evolution of massive stars near the end of their lifetime. 


Found in: Atom & Cosmos
Comments 8
  • This experiment is a proof of ephemeral nature of the red giants.
    Not only Betelgeuse, but today we know several red giants shrinking or expanding due to change of accretion.
    Red giants and red supergiants are clouds of gas heated by gravitation energy of cosmic gas during its accretion. There is no any fussion or fission reactions on those types of stars.
    See for detailed information http://bourabai.kz/evolution-e.htm
    http://bourabai.kz/evolution2-e.htm
    Karim Khaidarov Karim Khaidarov
    Jun. 11, 2009 at 1:47am
  • Question for any mainstream astronomer: My understanding of supernova explosions involves the production via fusion, in the star's interior, of carbon, iron, and the heavier elements, to the point where the star chokes on the garbage in its belly, ejecting it in a violent explosion. I believe that's basically what I have read, though it's admittedly a simplified picture. If, as K.K. asserts, there is no fusion involved in the life of red giants, what mechanism produces the explosion? I read Bourabai. His thesis attempts to overturn accepted science, including the General Theory of Relativity. Need reputable input here, please.
    Robert Alderman Robert Alderman
    Jun. 11, 2009 at 8:45am
  • Somewhat of a foolish question as I could probably do the math myself but how far back in history are we now viewing this reduction of Betelgeuse and assuming that it has gone supernova at some predictable time? how long before we might see that result. Thank you, Fred West
    Fred West Fred West
    Jun. 11, 2009 at 12:44pm
  • Robert Alderman wrote:
    what mechanism produces the explosion?

    - There are two main types of supernovae, I and II
    Type I, exactly Ia is precise "candle" of cosmology scale because its yield, the energy of explosion is constant.
    This feature gives us reason for suggestion about nuclear fission reaction with constant critical mass on supernova. This suggestion corresponds to model of supercomperssed state of material within old stars.
    And it is plausible hypothesis because an old star is a star of great mass accreted during a long time of its life.
    I think that modern astrophysical paradigm of stellar mass melting is wrong. Except supernova explosion there is no so powerful process which can bring escape velocity for stellar material (hundreds km/s).
    For detailed information about supercompressed states of material please see my paper http://bourabai.kz/quasars-e.htm
    A study of 434 type Ia supernovae in http://bourabai.kz/universum.htm
    Karim Khaidarov Karim Khaidarov
    Jun. 12, 2009 at 12:55pm
  • Fred West wrote:
    "how far back in history are we now viewing this reduction of Betelgeuse and assuming that it has gone supernova at some predictable time? how long before we might see that result."
    - Indeed, the mass of supernova is more than 100 solar mass.
    Mass of red giant is comparable with solar mass (1-10Ms)
    It is a reason that red giant was not supenova never in past.
    Karim Khaidarov Karim Khaidarov
    Jun. 12, 2009 at 1:03pm
  • Karim -

    Gobbledegook. I'll stick with Einstein.
    Robert Alderman Robert Alderman
    Jun. 12, 2009 at 2:01pm
  • While KK is clearly reading been reading the National Enquirer Science page (Sorry Karim; but your mostly off base), I too have often wondered whether or not thermal fusion is solely responsible for the the inflation of stars - or whether the processes that we think drive Type II Superpovae (those 'hour-glass' rings of 1987A - not the one in the middle, we know why thats there: the ones that form the 'rims' of the hourglass: I think I have it, by George! I'm wrting the Burbiches {sp?} as UCSD! They, and Hoyle, did more for 'fusion-cum-inflation' theory than Einstein did, maaaaan!); wittness the 'iffy' excuses for their never having found a large enoung Solar Electron Neutrino Flux for fusion to be the ONLY force empowering inflation.
    I think theres another force there; but then I would have scoffed at the idea that Coal and Steam was powering a Great Dynamo in the sky, that came into vogue in the 19th Century. Responsibility for Old Sol's Life Giving Emminances has always been 'assigned' to the 'latest' Great New Force to have been discovered; why are we so sure that Fusion is ALL there is - just because it, too, was once the 'latest, and most powerful power' known?
    Just look at a 1930's Popular Mechanics Cover every now and again; then you'll adopt this WEIRD 'Question Everything!' Perspective that I've developed, too!
    James Staples James Staples
    Jun. 15, 2009 at 12:57pm
  • It's because of global warming.
    Jeff Slough Jeff Slough
    Jul. 2, 2009 at 7:27pm
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator