Advertisement

Science Friday
CT scan nearly as good as regular colonoscopy
Less-invasive procedure might encourage people at high risk of colorectal cancer to get regular screenings
Web edition : Tuesday, June 16th, 2009
font_down font_up Text Size

Undergoing a virtual colonoscopy might be just the ticket for people at high risk of colorectal cancer who need screening every few years, a new study finds. By spotting 85 percent of polyps, computed tomography scans offer a way to detect the precancerous growths in a way that is less invasive than a conventional colonoscopy, a European team of researchers reports in the June 17 Journal of the American Medical Association.

A slew of tests over the past decade have shown that CT scanning can be useful in detecting polyps (SN: 12/6/03, p. 355). The scans aren’t quite as thorough as a conventional colonoscopy, widely considered the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening. In the conventional procedure, a doctor uses a flexible tube fitted with a tiny scope to inspect the colon. The flexible device can also snip off any polyps found during the procedure, making colorectal cancer highly preventable (SN: 11/11/00, p. 312).

But flexible-scope colonoscopy carries a risk of colon perforation, requires some degree of sedation and causes discomfort. For these reasons, many people delay or avoid getting the procedure. About half of the people in the United States due for a colonoscopy or other colon screening test haven’t gotten one, says radiologist Daniele Regge of the Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment in Turin, Italy.

Regge and his colleagues identified 937 people in Italy and Belgium who were at high risk for colorectal cancer. Of these, 373 had a family history of the disease, 343 others had a personal history of polyps and the remaining 221 had stool samples that contained traces of blood. From December 2004 to May 2007, each volunteer underwent a CT scan for colorectal polyps and later on the same day had a routine flexible-scope colonoscopy.

The scope colonoscopies revealed polyps in 177 people, whereas the CT scan detected them in 151, for an 85 percent accuracy rate. The CT scan caught polyps one centimeter in length or larger 91 percent of the time.

Though this study looked only at people with high risk, virtual colonoscopy might also be useful to the broad population. With so many people skipping flexible-scope colonoscopies, “an imperfect test that has a lower risk profile and greater acceptance among patients seems to be an appealing solution,” says surgeon Emily Finlayson of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, in an editorial in the same JAMA issue.

People who have had a polyp removed are at highest risk and should get screened every three years thereafter, Regge says. The new findings suggest that the adoption of CT scans could make the regimen of frequent screenings less onerous, he says.

People without any known risk factors should get a colonoscopy or other screening every 10 years starting at age 50, according to the American College of Gastroenterology. These other screenings include stool sample testing, virtual colonoscopy or a partial colonoscopy, called a sigmoidoscopy.


Found in: Body & Brain
Comments 6
  • Have you actually had either procedure? Because frankly I just had both and neither is any fun. And I bet the cost is about the same (waiting for the bill as we speak).
    Andrew Rosenberg Andrew Rosenberg
    Jun. 16, 2009 at 5:08pm
  • Two thoughts: if virtual CT is recommended for people at high risk of cancer, and its use means it will take 2 procedures to remove polyps which have a good chance of being there, how does the cost compare?

    Second: CT is an x-ray procedure, and a radiologist I know says that there is concern on the horizon about its overuse.
    joan waltermire joan waltermire
    Jun. 18, 2009 at 10:44am
  • The problem here is that if you do have a virtual colonoscopy--which, I understand, does require the same awful prep as an actual colonoscopy, and a polyp is found, you then have to have a real colonoscopy, and undergo that awful prep process again, so that the surgeon can use a regular colonoscopy to find and remove the polyp and, no doubt, look around to confirm the findings of the virtual scan while he is "up there."
    Gary  Reynolds Gary Reynolds
    Jun. 18, 2009 at 7:44pm
  • While the virtual colonoscopy is not as effective as the conventional colonoscopy, I've read that it uncovers more extra-colonic tumors than the conventional colonoscopy finds in the colon.

    My ex-wife learned last year that she had cancer of the endometrium, omentum, ovaries, and uterus.....after several clean check-ups with conventional colonoscopy.

    Stand back and observe the forest, not just the trees.
    Iggy Dalrymple Iggy Dalrymple
    Jun. 28, 2009 at 6:36pm
  • CT almost as good as colonoscopy in detecting polyps. CT not so good at detecting other possibly cancerous or pre-cancerous problems. CT not so good at detecting other problems (diverticulitis, internal hemroids). If polyps are found a colonoscopy is needed for tyheir removal. CT involves high doses of radiation. Because of these factors, Medicare covers colonoscopy but not virtual colonoscopy. From personal experience, colonoscopy with recent generations of colonoscopy equipment causes no pain or discomfort and does not require sedation. I have regular colonoscopies every several years and have never had or nee4ded sedation. javw
    James van Wyk James van Wyk
    Jul. 8, 2009 at 2:31pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat2 m9bnat m9bnat2
    Jan. 9, 2010 at 4:53pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Johnson, C.D.l, et al. 2008. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. 2008. New England Journal of Medicine 359:1207-1217.
  • Pickhardt, P.J. 2006. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: Review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 239:313-316.
  • Segnan, N., et al. 2007. SCORE3 Working Group-Italy. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology 132:2304-2312.
  • Seppa, N. 2003. No Scope: CT scan works as well as colonoscopy. Science News 164(Dec. 6):355. [Go to]
  • Weiss, P. 2000. Pile-o'-polymers breaks up on command. Science News 158(Nov. 11):312. [Go to]
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Regge, D., et al. 2009. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association 301(June 17):2453-2461.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator