Advertisement

Science Friday
Pairing off in the early universe
Simulations reveal that some of the first stars had partners
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Stellar companionA simulation of a star-forming region about 200 million years after the Big Bang shows two embryonic stars (yellow), each about five times the mass of the sun and separated by 800 times the Earth-sun distance. The computer model indicates that the two embryos will draw closer and form a binary star system, with each member as massive as 100 suns.Copyright Science/AAAS

It’s usually nice to have a companion. And in the lonely, dark expanse of the early universe, even some of the first stars had soul mates, new simulations reveal.

Previous studies had indicated that the first stars were extraordinarily massive — at least 100 times as heavy as the sun — but were also loners (SN: 6/8/2002, p. 362). Now, more detailed modeling, including a careful consideration of how atomic and molecular hydrogen interact at low densities, reveals that at least 5 percent and perhaps as many as half of these heavyweights were gravitationally bound to similar-mass companions, says Tom Abel of Stanford University He and his colleagues, Matthew Turk of Stanford and Brian O’Shea of Michigan State University in East Lansing, report their findings online July 9 in Science.

Pairs of massive stars are intriguing, notes Abel, because each star will probably collapse into a black hole. The coalescence of the two black holes would be a key source of gravitational waves, ripples in space-time predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity but never directly detected.

A second star’s presence could also enhance the production of distant gamma-ray bursts, flashes of high-energy light that have long-lasting afterglows and provide a window on the early universe. Gamma-ray bursts are produced when a single, massive star that crunches down into a black hole generates powerful jets of particles. A companion star can spin up its partner, and such rapid rotation may help generate the energetic jets, Abel says.

Star formation in the early universe is relatively easy to model because the infant cosmos contained only a few elements —  mainly hydrogen and helium gas — which cooled and collapsed to produce stars. But even the simple interactions between atomic and molecular hydrogen hadn‘t been previously studied at low-enough densities, Abel says. He and his colleagues followed the star-forming process about 200 million years after the Big Bang, as gravity condensed gas clouds, to much higher densities than his team could in past simulations, Abel adds.

Only one in five of the team’s simulations produced stellar pairs, and for now the researchers can only provide a rough estimate of the percentage of first stars that would have had partners. He expects that within a year, larger, more comprehensive simulations will pin down the number.

The first generation of stars is not visible with today’s telescopes, but the proposed successor to Hubble, the infrared James Webb Space Telescope, scheduled for launch in 2014, has a good chance of recording large groupings of these earliest of glimmers.

“The simulations make good sense,” says theorist Volker Bromm of the University of Texas at Austin. Bromm says that his own team’s simulations track the evolution of pairs or groups of embryonic stars for an additional 100,000 years beyond that of Turk’s group — a necessity, he says, to determine if the baby stars merge into one big star or remain separate. His team indeed finds that the fledgling stars remain close partners. Bromm says his team plans to post a paper online describing the results later this month.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos
Comments 2
  • This is not a science but a science fiction only.
    Tom Abel and Matthew Turk do not understand that "the early universe" is senseless notion to eternal Universe.
    Computer models reflect mathematician's believes about Universe architecture only.
    For true knowledge we must know physics of cosmic processes.
    Those mathematicians beleive in myths of "Big Bang" (while the Universe is eternal and infinite and explosion in nothing is nonsense), "black holes" (while the light has no mass and it can't attract by celestial bodies)
    Who want save his mind from this fairy tales must think and study real physics.
    My help in FAQ [Link was removed]
    and true version of stellar evolution in [Link was removed]
    Karim Khaidarov Karim Khaidarov
    Jul. 10, 2009 at 3:22am
  • Regardless of "simulations" vs "findings":

    On The Origin Of Origins

    Dark Matter-Energy And “Higgs”?
    Energy-Mass Superposition
    The Fractal Oneness Of The Universe
    All Earth Life Creates and Maintains Genes


    A. On Energy, Mass, Gravity, Galaxies Clusters AND Life, A Commonsensible Recapitulation
    [Link was removed] #2125
    The universe is the archetype of quantum within classical physics, which is the fractal oneness of the universe.

    Astronomically there are two physics. A classical physics behaviour of and between galactic clusters, and a quantum physics behaviour WITHIN the galactic clusters.

    The onset of big-bang's inflation, the cataclysmic resolution of the Original Superposition, started gravity, with formation - BY DISPERSION - of galactic clusters that behave as classical Newtonian bodies and continuously reconvert their original pre-inflation masses back to energy, thus fueling the galactic clusters expansion, and with endless quantum-within-classical intertwined evolutions WITHIN the clusters in attempt to delay-resist this reconversion.


    B. Updated Life's Manifest May 2009
    [Link was removed] #entry412704
    [Link was removed] #2321

    All Earth life creates and maintains Genes. Genes, genomes, cellular organisms - All create and maintain genes.

    For Nature, Earth's biosphere is one of the many ways of temporarily constraining an amount of ENERGY within a galaxy within a galactic cluster, for thus avoiding, as long as possible, spending this particularly constrained amount as part of the fuel that maintains the clusters expansion.

    Genes are THE Earth's organisms and ALL other organisms are their temporary take-offs.

    For Nature genes are genes are genes. None are more or less important than the others. Genes and their take-offs, all Earth organisms, are temporary energy packages and the more of them there are the more enhanced is the biosphere, Earth's life, Earth's temporary storage of constrained energy. This is the origin, the archetype, of selected modes of survival.

    The early genes came into being by solar energy and lived a very long period solely on solar energy. Metabolic energy, the indirect exploitation of solar energy, evolved at a much later phase in the evolution of Earth's biosphere.

    However, essentially it is indeed so. All Earth life, all organisms, create and maintain the genes. Genes, genomes, cellular organisms - all create and maintain genes.


    Dov Henis
    (Comments from 22nd century)
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Jul. 13, 2009 at 2:30am
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Cowen, R. 2002. Cosmic dawn. Science News 161(June 8):362-364. [Go to]
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Turk, M.J., T. Abel, and B. O’Shea. In press. The formation of population III binaries from cosmological initial conditions. Science.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator