Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Book Review: Conservation Refugees: The Hundred-Year Conflict Between Global Conservation and Native Peoples
Review by Rachel Zelkowitz

Buy this book

A+ A- Text Size

Review by Rachel Zelkowitz

By Mark Dowie

Web edition: July 17, 2009
Print edition: August 1, 2009; Vol.176 #3 (p. 30)

Enlarge
Book Review: Conservation Refugees: The Hundred-Year Conflict Between Global Conservation and Native Peoples by Mark Dowie

Wilderness: The word evokes ideas of a land pristine, where native flora and fauna thrive untouched by humans. But Dowie, an investigative journalist, argues that the notion of virgin wilderness is largely a fantasy and shows how efforts to preserve land have upset the lives of millions of indigenous people around the world.

This thought-provoking book traces the story of ecological protection from its early days in the late 19th century. That’s when naturalist John Muir lobbied to evict American Indians from their ancestral lands in today’s Yosemite National Park, arguing that they threatened the land’s “natural” splendor.

The Yosemite Park model — which held that human activity and biological diversity are almost always mutually exclusive —became the standard philosophy of conservation organizations such as the World Wildlife Fund and the Nature Conservancy, Dowie writes.

As a result, a number of indigenous peoples have become “conservation refugees.” The Maasai hunters of the Serengeti, the Adivasi people of India’s forests and the Karen people in Thailand all faced eviction or severe restrictions after their land was declared a park or a reserve. Divorced from ancestral land and traditions, many societies have slid into poverty. Some even face extinction.

Dowie sympathizes, but he doesn’t romanticize these peoples’ lifestyles or capacity as land stewards. Not all indigenous societies have cared for their homes, just as not all conservationist groups prioritize biological diversity over human culture, he notes.

True ecological conservation requires balancing both interests, he writes. “If we really want people to live in harmony with nature, history is showing us that the dumbest thing we can do is kick them out of it.”

MIT Press, 2009, 336 p., $27.95.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (1)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.


  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat2 m9bnat m9bnat2
    Jan. 7, 2010 at 1:28pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us