Advertisement

Science Friday
Comet likely culprit in Tunguska blast
Clouds over London following the event are similar to those formed from today’s shuttle plumes
Web edition : Tuesday, July 28th, 2009
font_down font_up Text Size

Night-shining clouds created after space shuttle launches may offer clues into the cause of the Tunguska event, a mysterious blast which rocked southern Siberia more than a century ago.

Thin clouds have appeared at abnormally high altitudes over polar regions following space shuttle launches on several occasions in the past decade. These noctilucent, or night-shining, clouds typically occur in summer and lie at altitudes of about 85 kilometers, in a layer of the atmosphere called the thermosphere, says Michael C. Kelley, an atmospheric physicist at Cornell University. Kelley and his colleagues suggest in the July 28 Geophysical Research Letters that data gleaned from analyses of these high-flying clouds, as well as knowledge about the speed at which shuttle exhaust wafted to polar regions, now hint that the Tunguska blast of June 1908 (SN: 6/21/08, p. 5) resulted from a comet slamming into Earth’s atmosphere.

Each launch of a space shuttle, which burns a combination of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen as fuel, pumps about 300 metric tons of water vapor into the atmosphere at altitudes between 100 and 115 kilometers. Soon after the January 16, 2003, launch of the shuttle Columbia, a liftoff that took place just after the height of summer in the Southern Hemisphere, noctilucent clouds appeared over Antarctica. Similarly, a widespread display of the night-shining clouds showed up over Alaska two days after the shuttle Endeavour blasted off on August 8, 2007. Previous studies show that in both instances those clouds included material from the shuttle plumes.

 “Conventional wisdom says that the plumes shouldn’t reach the poles that quickly, but they do,” Kelley notes. So sustained high-altitude winds must be carrying the plumes to the poles.

Michael S. Stevens, a research physicist at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C., agrees: Experiments show that “winds can be strong at these altitudes, but they’re not well understood.”

Using data based on shuttle plume movement, the researchers suggest that the Tunguska blast could have been responsible for unusually bright noctilucent clouds over Europe soon thereafter. The likely composition of those clouds further suggests that a comet caused the blast.

Some of the thickest and brightest noctilucent clouds ever observed — ones that cast enough light to read a newspaper in the middle of the night — appeared over Europe on July 1, 1908, Kelley says. Not coincidentally, he and his colleagues argue, the Tunguska blast occurred over southern Siberia about 22 hours earlier. The team’s models suggest that winds and diffusion could have transported material from the site of the blast to the skies over London, a distance of about 5,000 kilometers, in little more than a day.

Scientists at the time suggested that the night-shining clouds over London were made of meteoritic dust. But those aerosols are typically too small to reflect sunlight efficiently, Kelley argues, suggesting the clouds above Europe were made of ice crystals. This assumption, along with the new analysis of shuttle plume movement, strongly suggests that the object that blazed into the atmosphere and disintegrated above Siberia was a moisture-rich comet rather than a relatively dry asteroid.

“That’s an interesting idea, and worth considering,” Stevens says. In an alternate scenario, he notes, rather than the moisture being transported to Europe and then coalescing into clouds, the clouds may have formed over Siberia and then been transported to the west.


Found in: Earth, Earth Science and Planetary Science
Comments 3
  • Now they find this out, after I wrote an essay on killer asteroids in April for an astronomy class in which I mentioned Tunguska being hit by an asteroid and for which I received a perfect grade (for the essay, not the class). Does this mean my essay is not valid? :)
    laurele laurele
    Jul. 29, 2009 at 12:34am
  • [Quote]“That’s an interesting idea, and worth considering,” Stevens says.[/Quote]

    - This is a pluperfect news :)
    Russian scientists knew cometary nature of Tunguska many decades ago.
    I am advice to Michael S. Stevens, Michael C. Kelley and other colleagues reading russian planetology papers at least sometimes.
    see for example [Link was removed] [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    Karim Khaidarov Karim Khaidarov
    Jul. 29, 2009 at 2:02am

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat
    Jan. 7, 2010 at 4:58am
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Perkins, S. 2008. Tunguska, a century later. Science News 173(Jun. 21): 5.
    Available to subscribers at [Go to]
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Kelley, M.C., C.E. Seyler, and M.F. Larsen. 2009. Two-dimensional turbulence, space shuttle plume transport in the thermosphere, and a possible relation to the Great Siberian Impact Event. Geophysical Research Letters 36(July 28):L14103-1.
    Abstract available at [Go to]
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator