- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
India’s 1.2 billion people belong to more than 4,600 ethnic and religious groups separated by caste, customs and language. But a shared genetic heritage runs deep in this teeming nation, a new DNA analysis suggests.
Indians today possess varying proportions of ancestry from two genetically distinct populations, concludes a team led by David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard Medical School in Boston. Members of one ancient population share DNA patterns with modern Middle Easterners, central Asians and Europeans, the researchers report in the Sept. 24 Nature. The other population shows no strong connection to any modern mainland group. The first group is dubbed “Ancestral North Indians” and the second “Ancestral South Indians.” Both of the groups existed before the founding populations that contributed to today’s genetic diversity moved to South Asia.
Members of each modern Indian group have inherited between 40 and 80 percent of their DNA from Ancestral North Indians and the rest from Ancestral South Indians, Reich and his colleagues say. This pattern applied to all castes within India and to traditional tribes as well. Each of these groups was derived from separate founding populations, according to the analysis. These founding populations arrived in South Asia between about 200 and 2,500 years ago, well before the colonial era, suggesting that current caste and ethnic divisions predate that time.
“This supports the view that castes grew directly out of tribal-like organizations during the formation of Indian society,” says molecular biologist and study coauthor Kumarasamy Thangaraj of the Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology in Hyderabad, India.
Members of upper castes and speakers of Indo-European languages, including Hindi, possessed the most genetic traits attributed to Ancestral North Indians.
A shared genetic ancestry from two ancient populations “may be the strong, invisible thread that binds all Indians” despite barriers of caste and custom, writes geneticist Aravinda Chakravarti of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore in a comment appearing in the same issue of Nature.
Reich’s team examined alterations of more than 560,000 nucleotides—the basic constituents of DNA—across the genome. DNA samples came from 132 individuals who belong to 25 groups representative of India’s ethnic and linguistic diversity. The researchers plugged this information into a new statistical model that they developed to reconstruct India’s genetic roots.
Many groups in India share an unusually large number of DNA alterations at precise spots. These findings fit a scenario in which many Indian populations were founded by small numbers of people that married and reproduced within their own groups, Reich’s team proposes. Marriage with outsiders would have diluted the number of shared DNA variations.
Other populations that have grown in relative isolation, such as Finns and Ashkenazi Jews, display many recessive genetic diseases. Further studies in India may identify genes involved in such diseases, the investigators say.
In one exception to the pattern of genetic mixture in Indian groups, Onge hunter-gatherers living on the Andaman Islands in the Indian Ocean display purely Ancestral South Indian ancestry, Reich and his colleagues say. Andaman Islanders possess direct genetic links to modern humans that left Africa around 70,000 years ago and eventually colonized what is now India, they suggest.
According to earlier research, India’s initial settlers arrived around 60,000 years ago. Speakers of Dravidian languages arrived roughly 5,000 years ago, followed by Indo-European speakers approximately 3,500 years ago. If the new analysis holds up, these early populations wouldn’t have contributed to modern mainland India’s genetic makeup. And founding populations of today’s Indian groups wouldn’t have reached South Asia until well after Indo-European speakers.
The team’s model can’t yet determine the original genetic makeup of India’s two ancestral populations or estimate when the two ancestral populations originated and first mixed. But the new analysis better dissects genetic relationships among groups in India than a 2008 study that analyzed variation at 405 nucleotides in 55 groups, Thangaraj says.
Found in: Anthropology and Humans
- For more information about David Reich’s research: [Go to]
- For more information about research at India’s Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology: [Go to]
- Indian Genome Variation Consortium. 2008. Genetic landscape of the people of India: A canvas for disease gene exploration. Journal of Genetics 87(April): 3-20. [Go to].
- Reich, D., et al. 2009. Reconstructing Indian population history. Nature 461(Sept. 24):489-494. doi:10.1038/nature08365.
- Chakravarti, A. 2009. Tracing India's invisible threads. Nature 461(Sept. 24):487-488.


Animals, and vegetables, do look a lot alike from one place to another, like, for examples, cucarachas, but they're, we know, the same. Not even the same species.
We, human, are the final product of evolution, I believe.
Bees live in better societies and so do the ants.
We are the giants on our way to conquer the planet.
Destroying it, (it's a possibility), we are, as a matter of fact, imposing to it our way of life.
That is a conquest.
It will start all over again.
Predictably.
The DNA shows that an information is the same missing to every living been.
One information.
The information, which ever it is, is what caused, to life, the motivation to fight and look how to remain and never die anymore.
When you find the lost ring, the only invisible and never again repeated, (after the first happening, the first light was never alone no more) source of it will allow you to live eternally. Will wil like it?
We are already dead matter, aren't we?
The researchers opined that the diversity of Indo-european genes definitely indicate the origin of Indo-european population possibly to India.
Why here the reporter substituted indo-European just came around 3500 years ago as if ANS is different group.His own bull shit?Clear case of twisting the actual study details.
The study clearly disproved totally, the Aryan Invasion theory which said to be happened around 3500 ago..
Another,important conclusion of the experts is those ancient African migration never happened via west Asia but by Coastal belt to reach India.
Please login or register to participate.