Advertisement

Science Friday
Pygmies' short stature linked to high death rates
Controversial findings suggest that elevated mortality rates breed small bodies
Web edition : Wednesday, October 14th, 2009
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Tall and small German anthropologist Egon von Eickstedt posed with Onge hunter-gatherers during a trip to the Andaman Islands in 1928.The Haddon Library/Univ. of Cambridge

The Grim Reaper can cut life short and, under the right circumstances, whittle those still standing down to the size of pygmies. That’s the controversial conclusion of a new study, published in the October Current Anthropology, that found that stature declined as death rates rose in three small-bodied populations over a 115-year period.

“We provide the first evidence that pygmy body sizes vary considerably over time, that they correlate strongly with mortality rates and that increasing mortality rates lead to even greater reductions of body size,” says Jay Stock of the University of Cambridge in England.

Stock and Andrea Migliano, both anthropologists at the University of Cambridge, say that their findings support a scenario in which most females are able to reproduce at relatively young ages, probably in response to high mortality rates, This physical trait then becomes more common from one generation to the next. Early-maturing bodies divert physiological resources away from growth, yielding small bodies as a side effect, the researchers hypothesize.

Critics of this argument suspect that environmental challenges, such as nutritional deficiencies or cramped forest quarters, prompted the evolution of short-statured populations.

Researchers have traditionally defined pygmies as populations with an average adult male height of no more than 155 centimeters, or about 5 feet, 1 inch. Hunter-gatherer groups classified as pygmies live in various regions, including Africa, Indonesia, the Philippines and the Andaman Islands, which lie southeast of Burma.

Stock and Migliano analyzed data from 11 British government and anthropological studies of Andaman Islanders conducted between 1871 and 1986. Investigations included a range of health and physical measures for 604 individuals from three pygmy groups — the Great Andamanese, the Onge and the Jarawa. Data also included population approximations for each group across time.

access
Island spread Map shows the location of the Andaman Islands in the Bay of Bengal and distributions of three pygmy populations in the mid-1800s.J. Stock, A. Migliano/Current Anthropology

Despite describing a small number of people who may have been assessed with varying degrees of accuracy, these studies provide the only long-term glimpse of growth changes within different pygmy groups, Stock says.

British colonies were first established on the Andaman Islands in 1858 and remained until 1947. Onge and Jarawa pygmies, who lived on separate islands, retreated into forests to avoid the British. Great Andamanese pygmies befriended the newcomers.

As a result, Great Andamanese individuals were exposed to infectious diseases against which they had no defense, including influenza, tuberculosis, measles and syphilis. Their approximate numbers dropped from 6,000 in 1858 to 600 in 1900. A low of 19 Great Andamanese individuals was recorded during the 1960s, but the population survives.

British historical records show that average heights for the Great Andamanese dropped markedly during the period of increased mortality, Stock and Migliano say. From 1879 to 1927, the average height of men who were measured decreased at a rate equivalent to 4.7 centimeters, or nearly 2 inches, every 100 years. Measured height declines for women were equivalent to 1.8 centimeters, or almost three-quarters of an inch, every 100 years.

Data from the 19th century were unavailable for the other two pygmy groups that avoided the British. But Onge men and women displayed average height increases from 1927 to 1962, after British attempts to interact with them had stopped. Onge population numbers declined from 1901 to 1951, although not as steeply as among the Great Andamanese.

Jarawa individuals were first measured in 1985. Average heights of 155 centimeters for men and 147 centimeters, or about 4 feet, 10 inches, for women exceeded all average heights recorded for the other two pygmy groups.

Population estimates for the Jarawa held stable during the colonial period, the researchers say.

A related 2007 study led by Migliano reported that pygmies in Africa and the Philippines tend to stop growing by early adolescence, have low life expectancies and begin reproducing at younger ages than taller hunter-gatherers. That pattern of findings also fits the idea that pygmy-sized bodies occur as a by-product of an evolved tendency for women to become fertile early in life, Stock says.

Anthropologist Brian Shea of Northwestern University calls such evidence “interesting but irrelevant to the origin of small body size in human pygmy groups.” Stock and Migliano document short-term, environmentally induced changes in height that would affect the size of any population, Shea contends.  This process can’t explain the origin of pygmies, he says.

He and a colleague have measured differing limb proportions in East African and West African pygmies. Other researchers have found slowed growth during childhood for Africa’s Mbuti pygmies, apparently due to reduced levels of a key growth hormone. Such data suggest that these groups have evolved small bodies in direct response to as yet unidentified, long-term challenges in distinctive habitats, Shea says.

Despite past high mortality rates, Stock and Migliano have no solid evidence that any Andaman Island pygmies mature exceptionally fast, remarks anthropologist Barry Bogin of Loughborough University in England. Historical accounts indicate that Andaman Island females married at ages as young as 11, but those sources don’t Indicate whether the girls were sexually mature at marriage, Bogin notes.

Stock and Migliano found no evidence of malnutrition, but they can’t rule out that that a lack of one or more essential nutrients in the diets of Andaman Island pygmies impeded growth, he adds.

“Longitudinal studies of pygmies and other short-statured people, with detailed nutritional and health information, are the only way to study this issue,” Bogin says.


Found in: Anthropology and Humans
Comments 3
  • There are plenty of non-pygmy forest and island dwellers. Short people (like my aunt's side of the family) are part of the normal bell curve of size in populations. Seems to me that these pygmie groups are most likely just the result of self-selection of short people getting away from the taller ones in places where they can make themselves the norm. These islands and the forests are remote, and the general population of humans isn't interested in going there. Thus, founder effects create shorties.

    Since I teach evolution and ecology at a major university, I am quite qualified to say that this "evolutionary pressure" rubbish is a misunderstanding perpetrated on undergrads by eminently sloppy teaching. Evolution does not select "for" anything. Evolution consists of random events. Some of those events are selected AGAINST, as evolution is a purely negative, not positive process. That means that anything that arises which is not selected AGAINST enough to eliminate it, will continue. Yes, there is one circumstance in which evolution can be thought of as positive selection - sexual selection - choosiness in mating. But even there, it is more correctly modeled as selection against those not showing the desired characteristic.

    This fundamental misunderstanding of evolution leads to a great deal of confusion in students, some of whom go on to become professors and propagate the error. The evolutionary sieve has large holes in it, and anything can get through that is capable of reproduction. Looked at properly, it becomes much more obvious how these few island peoples appear as pygmies. The reason is almost certainly founder effects, as the only other thing being selected against consistently is likely to be lack of food, at least from time to time, and there are so many environments where food is lacking and short stature doesn't predominate.
    John Toradze John Toradze
    Oct. 15, 2009 at 12:12pm
  • John,
    I applaud your efforts to correct misperceptions of evolutionary theory among the public but there are some pretty odd claims to make here, especially for someone who teaches ecology and evolution.
    Its true that size varies but to argue that small populations are simply running away from big ones is hilarious. Surely you are familiar with the island rule? body size change can happen quite rapidly and it seems very clear that it happens without selection operating directly on size, but on some other trait that constrains size. And this is true for all kinds of taxa. You are right to say that natural selection selects 'against' things. So in this case, waiting longer to mature is being selected against. The only problem with this study is they fail to mention that its been shown in quite a few other cases - involving natural fertility humans and involving other mammals. It incorporates a body of theory that is quite robust and used a lot in evolutionary ecology, called "Life History Theory." In this case adult mortality is driving the amount of time it takes to start reproducing by acting on the tradeoff between growth and survival. This is pretty central in life history theory (another major tradeoff is between the size and number of offspring). The reasoning the authors used is much more sophisticated than you give them credit, even if it is a bit less original then they claim. Several different life history models show that increased adult mortality can drive down adult size.
    (uh, i'm at a major university too, if that matters?).
    John  Appleseed John Appleseed
    Oct. 19, 2009 at 10:21pm
  • Dr. Toradze et al.,

    I too appreciate your efforts to teach evolution. With Mr. Appleseed, I would point out that English lacks an "evolutionary subjunctive tense," and there is a general agreement among most professional evolutionists to use sloppy terms like "evolve for" or "evolutionary pressure" as a shorthand for natural selection differentially favoring the survival and reproduction of individuals bearing a certain trait.

    This is a fascinating idea, and the life history-based hypothesis is good science in that it is a) objectively falsifiable (unlike "running away," which still needs to be documented and ideally quantified--small people aren't necessarily faster!), and it provides a potential explanation for the presence of pygmies.

    That said, there are a number of problems with it. One is that premature menarche is a medical condition that is fairly rare, so there should some data on how prevalent it is in "normal" populations, and according to this hypothesis, untreated women should be pygmies. So far as I know, this part of the hypothesis has not been tested explcitly. A second problem is that it doesn't explain what is going on with the men. I would really believe it if early sexual maturation is a) genetically linked for both sexes (so a son can inherit from his mother), and if b) it results in small males as well as small females.


    Heteromeles Heteromeles
    Oct. 20, 2009 at 10:32am
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • For more information about Andrea Migliano’s research: [Go to]
  • Migliano, A., et al. 2007. Life history trade-offs explain the evolution of human pygmies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (Dec. 18):20216. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708024105.
  • For more information on Jay Stock’s research: [Go to]
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Stock, J., and A. Migliano, 2009. Stature, Mortality, and Life History among Indigenous Populations of the Andaman Islands, 1871-1986. Current Anthropology, 50(October):713, doi:10.1086/605429.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator