Advertisement

Science Friday
Gamma-ray observations shrink known grain size of spacetime
Tininess of speed differences between photons from a gamma-ray burst uphold special relativity theory
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Texture of spacetimeA light wave travels through a spacetime that is grainy on the tiniest scales in this artist's illustration. A new study suggests that if spacetime is indeed grainy, the lumps can't be bigger than about 10-35 meters.T. Piran/Hebrew University

Smaller dots, Georges, please. In their efforts to unify quantum theory and gravity, theoretical physicists have likened spacetime to a Georges Seurat painting, composed of tiny dots or lumps that meld to form a seemingly smooth picture. But if spacetime really does have a grainy structure on the smallest scales, the cosmic painter may need to get finer brushes, a new study reveals.

The study, published online October 28 in Nature, suggests that the dots that may compose spacetime must be smaller than one-hundred-thousandth of a trillionth of the size of a proton. This new limit on the graininess of spacetime is one-thousandth the size that previous, less sensitive experiments had indicated.

Sylvain Guiriec of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and the University of Alabama in Huntsville and his colleagues used a powerful but indirect method to examine the structure of spacetime. The team measured the relative difference in the speed of two particles of light, or photons, of widely different energies. Both photons were emitted by a cosmic explosion known as a short-lived gamma-ray burst.

Many theories that seek to explain the action of gravity on subatomic scales are premised on the notion that space is lumpy or foamy on the tiniest of scales. Such theories also suggest that the speed of light is not constant but varies with a photon’s energy — in contradiction to Einstein’s theory of special relativity. The more energetic the photon is, the slower its speed. In simplified terms, that’s because higher energy photons have shorter wavelengths, which makes them more likely to bump into tiny lumps in spacetime and to be slowed by those structures.

access
Telltale timesScientists tested the speed of photons emanating from a cosmic explosion called a gamma-ray burst (illustrated here) and determined that the photons all traveled at essentially the same speed regardless of their energies. The finding upholds Einstein's special relativity theory and rules out some theories of quantum gravity.NRAO

The slowdown would be tiny, but the lower velocity of high-energy photons could in principle be detectable over a journey of several billion light-years.

This strategy led Guiriec and his collaborators to examine photons generated by a gamma-ray burst that erupted in a galaxy 7.3 billion light-years from Earth. Recorded by the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope on May 10, 2009, the burst produced an assortment of gamma-ray photons, including one with an energy of 31 billion electron-volts — about 13 billion times the energy of visible light — and another photon about one-tenth as energetic.

Although the two photons had significantly different energies and journeyed for more than 7 billion light-years, they arrived at the Fermi telescope less than nine-tenths of a second apart. That tiny time difference means that these photons traveled at almost exactly the same speed, just one part in 100 million billion apart, notes study coauthor Peter Michelson of Stanford University. That difference is small enough to suggest that the speed of light is constant regardless of the energy of the photon. The finding therefore rules out any theory of quantum gravity that predicts a large energy-dependent change in velocity, he adds.

The results also indicate that if the speed of light slows in direct proportion, or linearly, to the energy of a photon, then the size of a typical lump in spacetime must be less than 10-35 meters, notes Guiriec.

The fundamental theories of nature, whether for gravity, electromagnetism or elementary particles, dictate that the laws of physics are identical for all observers, independent of any observer’s speed or direction of motion. That notion, known as Lorentz invariance, is also a foundation of Einstein's theory of special relativity. By ruling out many quantum gravity theories that violate Lorentz invariance, the Fermi result upholds special relativity.

John Ellis of CERN in Geneva agrees that the Fermi results offer the strongest astronomical evidence for the constancy of the speed of light. But he cautions that the effects of spacetime graininess on the speed of photons can’t be easily distinguished from time delays or advances due to other effects such as light scattering in the intergalactic medium. 

Theorist Giovanni Amelino-Camelia of the University of Rome La Sapienza says that if the speed of light does vary linearly with energy and spacetime has lumps just below 10-35 meters, the Fermi telescope may soon be able to detect that fine graininess.

“These considerations allow us to have a slim hope that Fermi might soon stumble upon a new revolution in physics,” he says. Alternatively, observations over the next few years could rule out a linear relationship between the speed of light and photon energy. In that case, new equipment will be needed to search for a proposed weaker relation between the speed and energy, Amelino-Carnella notes.

Only a few years ago, he says, the possibility that experiments could probe the graininess of spacetime was deemed unlikely. The new result from the Fermi telescope “provides encouragement for the idea that the quantum gravity problem can be treated just like any other scientific problem—only a particularly difficult one.”


Found in: Atom & Cosmos
Comments 11
  • Is is just a weird coincidence that light is bouncing off lumps that are 10-33 meters and that supposed superstrings are the same size? If superstrings, which supposedly connect everything, everywhere and make up all are everywhere, could it be that when light photons travel, they jiggle past them?
    Manse Balmer Manse Balmer
    Oct. 29, 2009 at 12:36am
  • “Is is just a weird coincidence that light is bouncing off lumps that are 10-33 meters and that supposed superstrings are the same size? If superstrings, which supposedly connect everything, everywhere and make up all are everywhere, could it be that when light photons travel, they jiggle past them?”This timberland boots and I didn't agree with your opinion.
    Timberland Boots Timberland Boots
    Oct. 29, 2009 at 2:02am
  • Is it just a weird coincident that Peter Michelson has the same last name as that other great experimenter on questions of light's constant speed, Albert Michelson(Michelson-Morley), or is there perchance some degree of relativity here?
    Robert Avila Robert Avila
    Oct. 29, 2009 at 10:03am
  • I'm surprised that Ron Cowen in his report made no reference to the Planck length, which is 1.6 x 10^-35 m. Isn't this the scale at which we had expected to find lumpiness? Would a quantum gravity theorist like Lee Smolin care to comment on this seemingly negative finding? I'm all ears.
    Richard Holford
    Richard Holford Richard Holford
    Oct. 29, 2009 at 6:29pm
  • Robert. I was looking for answers from someone with useful insight. If I wanted sarcasm, I'd watch Family Guy. If you can actually refute my simple idea with scientific reason instead of lame sarcasm, I'd love to hear it. And as for Timberland, it's not my opinion, it's just an observation. I'm not a physist, I just like reading about it.
    Manse Balmer Manse Balmer
    Oct. 29, 2009 at 10:18pm
  • Maybe the energy expected to be dissipated is still lost, but this is seen in the form of a redshift. Maybe the universe isn't expanding as fast as we think.
    connor lynch connor lynch
    Oct. 30, 2009 at 6:14pm
  • On The Origin And Nature Of Cosmic Evolution

    It Is Space-Distance, Not Space-Time
    Life's Is A Ubiquitous Evolution Mode


    The mode of a gene's response to organism-culture's feedback signal, i.e. "replicate without change" or "replicate with change" in case of proven augmented energy constrainment by the offspring, is the mode of Life's normal evolution, which is the mode of evolution universally.

    Genes' Expression Modification
    [Link was removed] #3649

    Again, the scope of of genes lifehood is not just the lifehood of genes.

    Genes, and Life in general, are but one of the forms of mass, of constrained energy formats. The lifehood of genes is the foundation of the subject of evolutionary biology, which is a major component of the subject of life, which is a minute component of the subject of evolution of the universe, which is the subject for which humanity seeks a unified field theory.

    Since the big-bang resolution of E/m superposition ALL the energy of the universe is destined for the galactic clusters expansion plus laying down of the gravity natrix for the eventual cosmic impansion, and ALL the mass is destined to revert to energy for these ends. The mass-to-energy reversion is resisted by the mass, this resistance being the archtype of selection for survival by all materials, including life. This resistance is due, exciting to us, to the fact that - as we know from everyday experience - formation of mass requires investment of energy, that dissipates when the mass disintegrates. And as we also know from everyday experience all energy forms other than gravity end up eventually as gravity energy. This is expected since ALL the contents of the universe are manifestations of the gravity energy freed at Inflation.

    And again, a unified field theory is sought since unlike the evergrowing list of specific science/technology divisions drawn by the "scientists" trade-unions like the AAAS, the universe and Earth evolve as an integrated intertwined interrelated tangled whole and not as a collection of individual divisions.


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Updated Life's Manifest May 2009
    [Link was removed] #2321
    Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
    [Link was removed] #3108
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Nov. 1, 2009 at 1:49am
  • Dov,
    This is very interesting. I am fascinated by the concept of unity. Why do you suggest that “…ALL the contents of the universe are manifestations of the gravity energy freed at Inflation?”
    Natasha Protassova Natasha Protassova
    Nov. 12, 2009 at 8:09pm
  • Possible explanation of gamma ray controversy by AWT:

    [Link was removed]
    Zephir Zephir
    Nov. 24, 2009 at 11:09pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat
    Jan. 3, 2010 at 10:10pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat
    Jan. 5, 2010 at 7:17pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • More information about the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope [Go to]
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Abdo A.A., et al. A limit on the variation of the speed of light arising from quantum gravity effects. Nature online
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator