Antibiotic-resistant bacteria strike drug of last resort
Effective 1960s-era medicine shows first signs of failing in some infections
font_down font_up Text Size

PHILADELPHIA — Little-known drugs dating from the 1960s that have proved useful against stubborn bacterial infections are showing the first signs of falling prey to bacterial resistance, a study presented October 30 at a meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America shows.

Polymyxins are antibiotics that were developed and approved more than 40 years ago, but which fell out of favor because they showed some kidney toxicity. But with the ability to monitor kidneys closely, the drugs have made a quiet return to use in the past five years as one of the few medications that doctors can rely on to knock out certain hospital-acquired infections that are impervious to front line antibiotics, says Jason Kessler,an infectious disease physician at Columbia University Medical Center. Polymyxins fend off a broad category of gram-negative microbes that opportunistically infect the lungs, surgery sites, the urinary tract and catheter sites, often hitting patients who are in the intensive care units of hospitals.

Kessler and his colleagues analyzed bacterial samples from more than 1,000 patients between 2005 and 2008 at New York Presbyterian Hospital who had been treated for these kinds of infections. The review found that 6 percent of infections were resistant to polymyxin B, which along with polymyxin E (Colistin), is one of two polymyxins approved for use.

What’s more, incidence of bacterial resistance to polymyxin B doubled from 2006 to 2008, says Kessler, who presented the findings. The resistant bacteria were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These microbes show up in most large hospitals, Kessler says.

Neil Fishman, an infectious disease physician at the University of Pennsylvania hospital in Philadelphia, describes the recent history of polymyxins as an example of how ever-changing microbes can send medical care lurching to and fro.

“These are old antibiotics,” he says. Polymyxins work like detergents, degrading the bacterial cell wall. This harshness also accounts for their kidney toxicity in people. That makes them drugs of last resort. “I was told I would never have to use them, back in med school. But starting two years ago, I did have to use them,” Fishman says. “And now we’re seeing increased resistance to them.”


Found in: Body & Brain
Comments 2
  • Medical schools need to start teaching the work of Paul Ewald that found that he primary vector for cross-infection of patients in hospitals was physicians. It is the vectoring that leads to strains of antibiotic resistant bacteria, because with it they cannot spread beyond a single patient.

    The basic work of Lister is being shortchanged today and physicians have nobody who will call them o this.
    John Toradze John Toradze
    Nov. 1, 2009 at 12:10pm
  • When I first saw a TV show about robot doctors - the real doctor is somewhere else while the robot sees the patient - I was aghast. But maybe remote medicine is not a bad thing. It might cut back on disease transmission. Of course you'd need robot nurses too. (I am being semi-serious.)
    Mike Sullivan Mike Sullivan
    Nov. 1, 2009 at 10:12pm
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Alipour, M., et al. 2007. Antimicrobial effectiveness of liposomal polymyxin B against resistant Gram-negative bacterial strains. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 355(May):293-298. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.11.035
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Kessler, J., et al. 2009. Changes in susceptibility to polymyxin B amongst clinical specimens in a New York hospital, 2005-2008 (Abstract 903). Infectious Diseases Society of America meeting. Oct. 29-Nov. 1. Philadelphia.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator