Advertisement

Science Friday
Book Review: Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species: A Graphic Adaptation
Review by Sid Perkins
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species: A Graphic Adaptation by Michael Keller

Illustrated by Nicolle Rager Fuller

The first edition of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species laid out the case for evolution by natural selection with nearly 500 pages of dense prose and a single diagram. Now, writer Michael Keller and illustrator Nicolle Rager Fuller have artfully transformed this important book into a highly readable and copiously illustrated page-turner, available in hardcover and paperback.

Each of the chapters in this graphic adaptation presents a condensed version of a theme from the original book, explaining basic principles of evolution such as how variations among a creature’s offspring provide the raw material upon which natural selection operates.

Also included is an introductory chapter detailing the research and ruminations that led Darwin to conceive his theory. The book is further strengthened by an afterword that describes the public’s response to the book’s initial publication in 1859 and a timeline that shows post-Darwin breakthroughs in evolution-related topics such as genetics, population biology and paleontology.

The text accompanying this book’s marvelous, full-color illustrations draws directly from Darwin’s own words, including letters he exchanged with friends and scientists about the details and the implications of his nascent theory. The result is a powerful adaptation that offers a new generation of readers — and, indeed, readers of all ages — an engaging introduction to one of the most important books ever written.

Rodale Books, 2009, 192 p., $19.99.


Comments 1
  • Beyond Darwin

    On The Origin And Nature Of Cosmic Evolution
    It Is Space-Distance, Not Space-Time

    Life's Is A Ubiquitous Evolution Mode


    The mode of a gene's response to organism-culture's feedback signal, i.e. "replicate without change" or "replicate with change" in case of proven augmented energy constrainment by the offspring, is the mode of Life's normal evolution, which is the mode of evolution universally.

    Genes' Expression Modification
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/200/122.page#3649

    Again, the scope of of genes lifehood is not just the lifehood of genes.

    Genes, and Life in general, are but one of the forms of mass, of constrained energy formats. The lifehood of genes is the foundation of the subject of evolutionary biology, which is a major component of the subject of life, which is a minute component of the subject of evolution of the universe, which is the subject for which humanity seeks a unified field theory.

    Since the big-bang resolution of E/m superposition ALL the energy of the universe is destined for the galactic clusters expansion plus laying down of the gravity natrix for the eventual cosmic impansion, and ALL the mass is destined to revert to energy for these ends. The mass-to-energy reversion is resisted by the mass, this resistance being the archtype of selection for survival by all materials, including life. This resistance is due, exciting to us, to the fact that - as we know from everyday experience - formation of mass requires investment of energy, that dissipates when the mass disintegrates. And as we also know from everyday experience all energy forms other than gravity end up eventually as gravity energy. This is expected since ALL the contents of the universe are manifestations of the gravity energy freed at Inflation.

    And again, a unified field theory is sought since unlike the evergrowing list of specific science/technology divisions drawn by the "scientists" trade-unions like the AAAS, the universe and Earth evolve as an integrated intertwined interrelated tangled whole and not as a collection of individual divisions.


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Updated Life's Manifest May 2009
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/140/122.page#2321
    Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/180/122.page#3108
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Nov. 9, 2009 at 2:02am
Post a comment

Please login or register to participate.