Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Record chills are falling, but in number only
A+ A- Text Size

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: November 12, 2009

Weather-monitoring stations in the Lower 48 have been logging record daily highs in temperature at twice the pace of record lows. Yet more evidence of climate warming. 

Many people have pointed to colder than normal winters — or summers — as evidence that global warming is a myth. Climatologists have countered that weather, the meteorological features that we experience at any given hour or day, may show anomalies even as Earth’s overall climate warms. So weather can locally mask the planet’s overall slowly rising fever.

Except that any such mask appears to be disappearing throughout most of the United States, according to a new study. Where the climatic thermostat is stable, the ratio of record highs to lows should be about even. That 2:1 ratio of highs to lows means that “climate change is making itself felt in terms of day-to-day weather,” concludes the study’s lead author, Gerald Meehl of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. And, he adds, “The ways these records are being broken show how our climate is already shifting.”

It's something that Guy Walton of the Atlanta-based Weather Channel suspected, a while back, based on recent record-temperature data. So when Meehl stopped by the television station to give a lecture on climate change to the station's meteorologists, Walton asked him why, since at least 2000, record highs had become twice as common as record lows.

Meehl had no idea. Before long he, Walton and others were analyzing several million temperature readings that had been gleaned since around 1950 — data from some 1,800 weather stations across the continental United States.

The 2:1 ratio that Walton turned up proved real, the researchers now confirm in a paper that’s due to appear in Geophysical Research Letters. And the trend stems from a paucity of record lows, not a stunning increase in record highs. In other words, a disproportionate amount of the excess warming is taking place at night — a finding that Meehl notes is consistent with modeling data on temperature trends expected in a warming world. (Moreover, Meehl points out, U.S. weather-monitoring stations have been recording warmer minimum temperatures over most of the last few decades, irrespective of whether they broke any records.)

During mid-century, the number of record U.S. temps were about evenly distributed between highs and lows. During the 1960s, record lows were slightly more common. But since the 1970s, daily temperatures have definitely been trending towards an excess of new highs.

Data from half a world away exhibit a similar trend. “We found out about a study being done in Australia, sort of in parallel with ours,” Meehl says. There too, scientists turned up a roughly 2:1 ratio of record highs to lows.

Much of the new U.S. paper focused on a statistical point: something known as 1/n, where “n” stands for the number of years that temperatures have been recorded at a given monitoring station.

So the first year amounts to 1/1 — or 100 percent. With no previous data to compare a day’s temperatures against, 100 percent of readings will constitute “record” values. But by year two, if climate is stable, you’ll have one-over-two; so you’d expect half as many records highs. The year after that, just one-third of days should constitute a record.

Now, after logging 60 years of data, each weather station should turn up only about six record temps per year. But “we’re seeing proportionately more record highs and record lows — by about a factor of two,” Meehl says. Indeed, this year isn’t over yet, but through September the 1,800 monitoring stations have already logged 11,711 new highs and 7,449 new lows. So they’re on track to average 14 new temperature records a piece, this year.

And down the road? Meehl’s team modeled what we might expect decades from now, based on a mid-range projection of likely greenhouse-gas emissions and climate warming. This exercise, meant to be illustrative, not truly predictive, indicated that as warming continues to increase, the ratio of record highs to lows will grow — significantly. Think 8:1 by mid-century; 20:1 by 2100.

One surprise: “When we started doing this modeling, I thought that by the end of the century everything was going to be so warm that record low temperatures would disappear,” Meehl recalls. Not so, if the models can be believed. Even then, he says, “on average, you’d still see the occasional record cold snap."

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Meehl, G.A., . . . G. Walton, et al. 2009. The Relative Increase of Record High Maximum Temperatures Compared to Record Low Minimum Temperatures in the U.S. Geophysical Research Letters. Vol. 36, Dec. 1, p. L23701. doi:10.1029/2009GL040736. Abstract available. [Go to]

Comments (9)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • When you think about it, the old counting records trick really doesn't provide highly useful data compared to looking at changes in temperature. The main exception is that extrema tend to have the greatest impact on people, and counting records looks at extrema and discounts typical weather, whereas computing averages emphasizes typical weather.

    Looking at data by decades masks shorter term trends. For example, global temperatures have been falling, on average, since 2002. Last month was the 3rd coldest October in the US record back to 1895. For example, http://www.longrangeweather.com/Records/Default.aspx lists 931 new high temperature records, but 1791 lows. (And 6141 record low maximum temperatures.)

    Last year the US had an average temperature very close to the long term average and this year is on track to repeat. It used to be that we would hear stories about "the warmest year on record," that seems to have been replaced by "the warmest decade on record." Is it too much to ask that we celebrate average years too?
    Ric Werme Ric Werme
    Nov. 13, 2009 at 1:44am
  • BTW, there's a nice graphic of the changing ratios at http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/12/ncar-number-of-record-highs-beat-record-lows-if-you-believe-the-quality-of-data-from-the-weather-stations/ . It's a pity that the study didn't include the 1930s and 1940s to encompass the hot end of the previous PDO cycle.
    Ric Werme Ric Werme
    Nov. 13, 2009 at 8:42am
  • Take a look at [Link was removed] to see that 89% of weather recording stations don't meet NOAA's own standards. NOAA has eliminated most rural stations and used mostly urban stations without compensating for Urban Heat Island Effect. Their pronouncments are all intercoursed up, to put it politely.
    ART DAY ART DAY
    Nov. 15, 2009 at 12:48am
  • It should be no surprise that the corrupt meteorological database is still fatally flawed and continuing to produce artifacts of urbanization, not measurements of a useful nature. But I must say, warmer urban areas probably save lives in winter among the homeless comunity and save on everyone elses heating bills. The Science News editors apparently have no understanding of the width and depth of the propaganda being generated from the "publish or perish" monolith.
    Francis Manns Francis Manns
    Nov. 15, 2009 at 9:05am
  • Given the well documented urban island effect and the fact that the last 60 years of urban growth in the US and Australia, isn't this exactly the result that one would expect to find? Without adjusting for the documented rise in temps as a result of urban incursion into the measurement zones, and without seeking measurements from areas that have not experienced the urban island effect (think Antartica?), then what is the point of this "study"? Pointing out correlations in known skewed data does not constitute a "study", it is really only the start of a study. It would be like saying that temperatures of people are rising based on measurements of people's temperatures when taken at the hospital. We already know that people who go to the hospital often have infections and run a temperature.... What does identifying such a trend tell us? Nothing really. A study starts when a researcher begins to tackle and account for the known issues that are inherent in the dataset.
    Peter Wachtell Peter Wachtell
    Nov. 15, 2009 at 9:39am
  • Oh good, Joe D'Aleo posted a graphic that shows the massive number of high temperature records set in the 1930s. It would really, really be nice if the authors of the NCAR/Weather Channel update their study to include those earlier decades. In fact, I'd go a step further. The warming trend in those decades is so well known I find it hard to believe they could have been left out by accident. How could any climate professional not think of comparing those decades or the previous PDO cycle? Without both an explanation and the data for those decades, this study belongs at Realclimate.org and not at Sciecne News.

    See http://icecap.us/images/uploads/DECADALRECORDSHALL.JPG from http://hallofrecord.blogspot.com/2009/11/critique-of-october-2009-ncar-study.html
    Ric Werme Ric Werme
    Nov. 15, 2009 at 2:34pm
  • Beware of consensus. Use free inquiry (science) instead. While the questions and data collections go forward, keep the age old human response to climate change active and free. When governments decide they freeze the science in law and all progress stops. Markets respond continuously and without violence.
    [Link was removed]
    Charles Johnsen
    Charles Johnsen Charles Johnsen
    Nov. 16, 2009 at 6:18pm
  • Go to [Link was removed] and scroll down to the three articles disecting this latest crocabaloney from NCAR/NOAA/NASA. There are some very clear graphics showing what happens when the '30s and 40s are included. And the Science News editors have a full understanding of the width and depth of the propaganda, they are using it to keep afloat. It will keep them afloat for a little while longer, then they will sink in the sea of junk science without a trace.
    ART DAY ART DAY
    Nov. 16, 2009 at 7:01pm
  • How relevant is this particular numbers game really? What matters is what of consequence is happening around the globe. Recent modeling-research results predict that in roughly 10 years the north pole will be sufficiently "free" of ice during part of the year to be considered an open shipping route. That measure of warming will be hard to deny when the time comes, and will create global warming's own positive feedback. This current numbers game is about to become a thing of the past.
    Ben Helvensteijn Ben Helvensteijn
    Nov. 19, 2009 at 7:00pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us