Advertisement

Science Friday
Corn genome a maze of unusual diversity
Multiple teams announce complete draft of the maize genome, with a full plate of surprises
font_down font_up Text Size
access
AMAZING DIVERSITYCorn’s amazing diversity is not just kernel deep: The near-complete genome of maize reveals a surprising amount of genetic diversity, even between strains of the crop plant.Science/AAAS

Cue the corny jokes.

Researchers have completed a draft of the maize genome. And while people may quip about the “amaizeing” achievement, scientists say the genetic blueprint of one strain of corn reveals serious amounts of genetic diversity and some weighty biology lessons that could lead to improvements in the already economically important crop plant.

A series of research papers published in the Nov. 20 Science and in the online journal PLoS Genetics report the genome draft and analyses of the plant’s genetic makeup. The work, conducted by many institutions and funded by the National Science Foundation, reveals that corn has an unusual ability to make new genes, lose others, alter activity of its genes and withstand radical genome remodeling. And surprising differences between two strains of corn may provide clues about why hybrids sometimes grow or yield better than parent strains.

Scientists have known that different strains of maize can vary widely in their genetic makeup. Although corn was domesticated only 8,000 to 10,000 years ago from the grass teosinte, the genetic diversity between any two strains of corn exceeds that found between humans and chimpanzees, species separated by millions of years of evolution. For instance, the strain B73, the agriculturally important and commonly studied variety decoded by the maize genome project, contains 2.3 billion bases, the chemical units that make up DNA. But the genome of a strain of popcorn decoded by researchers in Mexico is 22 percent smaller than B73’s genome.

“You could fit a whole rice genome in the difference between those two strains of corn,” says Virginia Walbot, a molecular biologist at Stanford University. 

access
HYBRID VIGOROften, when two inbred varieties of corn are crossed, the hybrid (shown center) is more robust and yields more than either parent (shown left and right). Corn's newly decoded genome may help scientists decipher the source of this hybrid vigor.Jun Cao and Patrick S. Schnable/Iowa State Univ. Reprinted with permission from Springer-Plant Science

Much of that difference is due to the action of transposable elements, better known as jumping genes. Transposable elements (transposons for short) are mobile pieces of genetic material that hop around the genome, sometimes taking genes or pieces of genes with them. It was in corn that Nobel laureate Barbara McClintock discovered transposons. The genome project discovered some new families of transposons, revealing a total of 1,300 such families in maize, says Patrick Schnable, a maize geneticist at Iowa State University in Ames. Together, transposons and other repeated pieces of DNA make up 85 percent of the maize genome in the B73 strain.

That’s an unusually high volume of repetitive DNA, and it made the decoding effort challenging, says Richard K. Wilson of the Genome Center at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. “This was a really tough one.” The large number of repeated stretches meant the popular shotgun approach — relying on computers to assemble a scatter-shot of DNA fragments from all over the genome into a coherent picture — wouldn’t work for deciphering corn’s code.

Instead, researchers had to fall back on a slower, bit-by-bit approach similar to that used in the Human Genome Project, first putting the pages of corn’s genetic instruction book in order and then determining the DNA letters on each page.

The project cost $30 million and is not entirely finished, but is already providing maize researchers with a wealth of knowledge.

B73’s genome contains about 32,000 genes, the researchers report in Science. Transposons have also left bits and pieces of genes scattered throughout the genome. Some of those fragments are active and may help control activity of other genes, Schnable says. The researchers also uncovered evidence that maize strains are creating new genes and losing others. For example, at least 180 of B73’s genes are missing from another strain of corn known as Missouri 17 or Mo17. In fact, thousands of pieces of DNA found in one strain are completely missing from the other, Schnable and colleagues report in one of the 10 companion articles published in PLoS Genetics. This degree of structural variation is not seen in any other plant, animal or fungus studied so far, says Schnable.

The researchers also describe variation in the number of copies of genes the two strains carry. Some of those gains and losses of genes and other sequences might contribute to hybrid vigor, a condition in which offspring are heartier and better yielding than either parent.

Researchers don’t yet know the source of hybrid vigor, but the genome sequence may make it easier to trace, Schnable says. To determine whether hybrid vigor is a product of gene activity, he and others compared gene activity in offspring of crosses between the B73 and Mo17 maize strains. In thousands of the hybrid’s genes, only the copy inherited from the male parent was active, the team reports in Science. This genetic phenomenon of only one parent’s gene being active is called imprinting. In humans, less than 1 percent of genes are imprinted. The magnitude of the imprinting in maize — the number of genes and the strong tendency for only paternal genes to be active — is surprising, Schnable says.

The researchers don’t know how or if imprinting contributes to hybrid vigor.

Corn’s liberal genetic policies might eventually get it into trouble. For instance, “In other species, it’s a rare individual that has active transposons,” Walbot says, because active transposons have the potential to disrupt crucial genes. But the strategy has worked for corn, allowing its genome to nimbly adapt to changing environmental conditions, often from generation to generation. But, the species could also, eventually, split into multiple species.

“Corn is living in peril, you might say,” Walbot says. “It has these features that allow flexibility in its genome, but there’s a cost to running this game.”


Found in: Genes & Cells and Life
Comments 7
  • Slowly, kicking and screaming, evolutionary biology is being driven to agree with me. I long ago concluded that the "silent DNA" was actually a control system and policy manual for directing evolution. Various strategies and guidelines and even specific archived options are stored and relied on when the species is under pressure.

    The genome is smart, and does NOT mutate randomly.
    Brian Hall Brian Hall
    Nov. 22, 2009 at 7:40pm
  • Corn Genome And More


    A. From "Corn genome a maze of unusual diversity"
    [Link was removed]
    Multiple teams announce complete draft of the maize genome, with a full plate of surprises that include hints about hybrid vigor.

    - Although corn was domesticated only 8,000 to 10,000 years ago from the grass teosinte, the genetic diversity between any two strains of corn exceeds that found between humans and chimpanzees, species separated by millions of years of evolution. Much of the maize strains diversity is most probably due to the action of transposable elements, better known as jumping genes. Transposons and other repeated pieces of DNA make up 85 percent of the maize genome in the B73 strain, that has about 32,000 genes.

    - Hybrid vigor: Often, when two inbred varieties of corn are crossed, the hybrid (shown center) is more robust and yields more than either parent (shown left and right). Corn's newly decoded genome may help scientists decipher the source of this hybrid vigor. In thousands of genes of B73/Mo17 maize strains hybrids, only the copy inherited from the male parent was active. This genetic phenomenon of only one parent’s gene being active is called imprinting. The researchers don’t know how or if imprinting contributes to hybrid vigor.

    - The researchers also uncovered evidence that maize strains are CREATING NEW GENES and losing others. In fact, thousands of pieces of DNA found in one strain are completely missing from the other.

    - “In other species, it’s a rare individual that has active transposons,” Walbot says, because active transposons have the potential to disrupt crucial genes. But the strategy has worked for corn, allowing its genome to nimbly adapt to changing environmental conditions, often from generation to generation. But, the species could also, eventually, split into multiple species.
    Corn is living in peril, you might say. It has these features that allow flexibility in its genome, but there’s a cost to running this game.”


    B. The subject obviously warrants the extensive multiple team effort and the data gleaned so far warrants a continuation of this grand project.

    But a few remarks about the subject sciencenews report:

    - An evolutionary contrast, for any purpose, of genomes of strains of corn domesticated only 8,000-10,000 yr ago with genomes of human-chimpanzee species separated by millions of years, is strange. The twain are not comparable. All genes-genomes, except human's, evolve by physiological adaptation to changing circumstance, whereas human genes-genomes, ONLY human genes-genomes,evolve
    in conjunction with change-control of circumstances. This is the ONLY evolved difference between humans and other organisms, THE difference that led also to virtual reality, i.e. to "spirituality".

    ( For religious persons, this may be the idea of Genesis 1:26. "Then God said Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth". OK, let's not indulge in How Man Rules...)

    - Researchers don’t know how or if imprinting contributes to hybrid vigor? Genetics don't initiate a course of expression modifications (unless by accident). It is the corn's culture, its vigor, that leads to the genetic modifications, to modified expressions, by feedback to the genome. The feedback is "Replicate with change, here is a case of proven augmented energy constrainment". This mode of Life's normal evolution is the mode of energy-mass evolution universally. Survival ( from reverting to energy ) is the moto of each and every form of mass in the universe, not only of life.

    - Evidence that maize strains are CREATING NEW GENES?

    - “In other species, it’s a rare individual that has active transposons”. Maybe the genetic uniqueness of corn is a result of its extensive and varied cultivation, and maybe its apparent genetic male imprinting is in fact a result of best survival expression at given circumstances...


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Updated Life's Manifest May 2009
    [Link was removed] #2321
    Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
    [Link was removed] #3108
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Nov. 23, 2009 at 4:06pm
  • Is your edit key broken?
    Wayne Lowe Wayne Lowe
    Dec. 21, 2009 at 9:48pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat2 m9bnat m9bnat2
    Jan. 9, 2010 at 5:03pm
  • The genome will help unravel the basic biology of corn. That information can be used to look for genes that make corn more nutritious or more efficient for ethanol production, for example.


    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    rocky jackson rocky jackson
    Jan. 12, 2010 at 2:46am
  • Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same content as you, the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up! Cheers. thanks for sharing. [Link was removed]
    Patrick Lyman Patrick Lyman
    Jan. 12, 2010 at 3:22pm
  • Thank you administrator...
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    Science News Science News
    Jan. 14, 2010 at 8:08pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Citations & References:
seperator
  • 1115 doi:10.1126/science.1178534

    Springer, N.M. et al. 2009. Maize Inbreds Exhibit High Levels of Copy Number Variation (CNV) and Presence/Absence Variation (PAV) in Genome Content PLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): e1000734 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000734

    Vielle-Calzada, J.-P. et al. 2009. The Palomero Genome Suggests Metal Effects on Domestication. Science 326(Nov. 20): 1078 doi:10.1126/science.1178437

    Gore, M.A. et al. 2009. A First-Generation Haplotype Map of Maize. Science 326(Nov. 20): 1115-1117 doi: 10.1126/science.1177837

    Swanson-Wagner, R.A. et al. 2009. Paternal Dominance of Trans-eQTL
    Influences Gene Expression Patterns in Maize Hybrids. Science 326(Nov. 20): 1118-1120 doi: 10.1126/science.1178294

    Wei, F. et al. 2009. The Physical and Genetic Framework of the Maize B73 Genome. PLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000715

    Zhang, L. et al. 2009. A Genome-Wide Characterization of MicroRNA Genes in Maize. PLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000716

    Wei, F., et al. 2009. Detailed Analysis of a Contiguous 22-Mb Region of the Maize Genome. PLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000728

    Zhou, S., et al. 2009. A Single Molecule Scaffold for the Maize Genome. PLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000711

    Soderlund, S., et al. 2009. Sequencing, Mapping, and Analysis of 27,455 Maize Full-Length cDNAs PLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000740

    Jia, Y. et al. 2009. Loss of RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase 2 (RDR2) Function Causes Widespread and Unexpected Changes in the Expression of Transposons, Genes, and 24-nt Small RNAs. PLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000737

    Liu, S. et al. 2009. Mu Transposon Insertion Sites and Meiotic Recombination Events Co-localize with Epigenetic Marks for Open Chromatin across the Maize GenomePLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000733

    Baucom, R.S. et al. 2009. Exceptional Diversity, Non-Random Distribution, and Rapid Evolution of Retroelements in the B73 Maize Genome. PLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000732

    Wolfgruber, T.K. et al. Maize Centromere Structure and Evolution: Sequence Analysis of Centromeres 2 and 5 Reveals Dynamic Loci Shaped Primarily by Retrotransposons. PLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000743

    Walbot, V. 10 Reasons to be Tantalized by the B73 Maize Genome. PLoS Genetics 5(Nov 20): doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000723

Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator