Advertisement

Science Friday
First programmable quantum computer created
Ultracold beryllium ions tackle 160 randomly chosen programs
font_down font_up Text Size

Using a few ultracold ions, intense lasers and some electrodes, researchers have built the first programmable quantum computer. The new system, described in a paper to be published in Nature Physics, flexed its versatility by performing 160 randomly chosen processing routines.  

Earlier versions of quantum computers have been largely restricted to a narrow window of specific tasks. To be more generally useful, a quantum computer should be programmable, in the same way that a classical computer must be able to run many different programs on a single piece of machinery.

The new study is “a powerful demonstration of the technological advances towards producing a real-world quantum computer,” says quantum physicist Winfried Hensinger of the University of Sussex in Brighton, England.

Researchers led by David Hanneke of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colo., based their quantum computer on two beryllium ions chilled to just above absolute zero. These ions, trapped by an  electromagnetic field on a gold-plated alumina chip, formed the quantum bits, or qubits, analogous to the bits in regular computers represented by 0s and 1s. Short laser bursts manipulated the beryllium ions to perform the processing operations, while nearby magnesium ions kept the beryllium ions cool and still.

Hanneke and colleagues programmed the computer to do operations on a single beryllium ion and on both of the beryllium ions together. In the quantum world, a single qubit can represent a mixture of 0 and 1 simultaneously, a state called a superposition. A laser pulse operation could change the composition of the mixture within the qubit, tipping the scales to make the qubit more likely to become a 1 when measured.

Both of the qubits together could be entangled, a situation where the two qubits are intimately linked, and what happens to one seems to affect the fate of the other. Different combinations of one- and two-qubit operations made up various programs. “We put all these pieces together and asked, what can we do with the circuit?” Hanneke says.

Hanneke and colleagues chose 160 programs for the quantum computer to run. “We picked them, quite literally, at random,” Hanneke says. “We really wanted to sample all possible operations.”

The researchers ran each program 900 times. On average, the quantum computer operated accurately 79 percent of the time, the team reported in their paper, which was published online November 15. “Getting this kind of control over a quantum system is really interesting from a physics perspective,” Hanneke says.

Earlier research has estimated that to be useful, a quantum computer must operate accurately 99.99 percent of the time. Hanneke says that with stronger lasers and other refinements, the system’s fidelity may be improved.

Experimental physicist Boris Blinov says that one of the most exciting things about the new study is that the quantum computer may be scaled up. “What’s most impressive and important is that they did it in the way that can be applied to a larger-scale system,” says Blinov, of the University of Washington in Seattle. “The very same techniques they’ve used for two qubits can be applied to much larger systems.”


Found in: Computers and Matter & Energy
Comments 7
  • i would like to see what programs where ran on the computer
    nathan mcmartin nathan mcmartin
    Dec. 2, 2009 at 4:03pm
  • If this computer is 79% accurate, you could put six of them together and have each perform the same task. They would all agree on the correct answer 24% of the time. If some disagree, simply re-run the program until they agree. (If there is only one possible incorrect answer, they would all agree on the incorrrect answer 0.01% of the time.)

    This admittedly clumsy approach gets the quantum computer to about the 99.99% accuracy the article presents as a goal.
    S Gruhn S Gruhn
    Dec. 4, 2009 at 2:57pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat
    Jan. 3, 2010 at 10:08pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat
    Jan. 5, 2010 at 7:17pm
  • Nice post, I like it very much.
    Thanks.
    [Link was removed]
    Tom Brian Tom Brian
    Jan. 12, 2010 at 1:11pm
  • hımm [Link was removed] Thank you very nice stories
    Manga İndir Manga İndir
    Jan. 14, 2010 at 8:20pm
  • hımm [Link was removed] Thank you very nice stories [Link was removed] [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    Manga İndir Manga İndir
    Jan. 14, 2010 at 8:33pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.


Advertisement
Suggested Reading:
seperator
  • Sanders, L. 2009. Mechanical systems all tangled up. Science News 176(July 4): 8.
    [Go to]
  • Sanders, L. 2009. Minifridge makes quantum computers last. Science News Web edition, Aug. 6.
    [Go to]_
Citations & References:
seperator
  • Hanneke, D. et al. 2009. Realization of a programmable two-qubit quantum processor.
    Nature Physics, published online Nov. 15.
    DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS1453
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator