- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
NEW ORLEANS — A shortage of vitamin D may stack the deck against people fighting a common form of lymphoma, researchers reported December 5 at a meeting of the American Society of Hematology. The new study adds this cancer to the list of malignancies suspected of being more difficult to control in patients with vitamin D deficiency common in parts of the U.S. population.
From 2002 to 2008, the researchers analyzed blood samples from 374 newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a fast-growing cancer of white blood cells called B cells. It mainly hits people over 50 and accounts for roughly 40 percent of lymphomas.
The study participants averaged 62 years of age. The blood tests revealed that half were deficient in vitamin D at the start of treatment, having less than 25 nanograms per milliliter of blood.
The scientists monitored the patients for an average of three years. During the follow-up, patients who were deficient in vitamin D were twice as likely to die, compared with patients who had adequate vitamin D blood levels at the outset. Patients with low vitamin D concentrations were also about 50 percent more likely than the others to have their cancer worsen, says endocrinologist Matthew Drake of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., who presented the findings.
All patients received standard treatment, including chemotherapy, and the researchers accounted for differences between groups in age and other factors that might bias the comparison.
Vitamin D facilitates calcium absorption in the body, an essential function. While the minimum healthy blood levels of vitamin D are a matter of debate, many scientists draw the line at 25 or 30 ng/ml. Others suggest we need more vitamin D and suggest the minimum healthy level should be defined as 40 ng/ml. “I think right now it’s a moving target,” Drake says. He and his colleagues chose 25 ng/ml because that is the point at which the body starts leaching calcium from bone to maintain appropriate blood levels of calcium.
Drake says more study is needed before supplementation of vitamin D should be ordered for lymphoma patients. Part of his hesitation stems from the lack of clarity surrounding the link between cancer and a vitamin D deficiency.
Past evidence has shown that the vitamin can promote gene regulation, programmed cell death when necessary, and other critical cell functions. “Whether or not vitamin D deficiency plays a role in lymphoma, we really can’t say at this point,’ he says.
But vitamin D deficiency has been linked to cancers in past studies. Maps suggest that mortality rates from cancer are higher in the northernmost areas of the United States — notable because less sun exposure means less vitamin D production — and some studies have linked vitamin D deficiency with a worse outcome in people with cancer of the breast, colon and throat.
The link between a vitamin D deficiency and a worse outcome for this cancer is plausible, says Ola Linden, a medical oncologist at Lund University in Sweden. But the finding might still be influenced by genetic differences among the patients and other factors, and needs to be validated in a trial in which patients are randomly assigned to get vitamin D supplements or not, he says. If the results from such a test were similar to these, he says, oncologists would have another weapon with which to fight this cancer — free of charge.
Although fortified foods provide some vitamin D, these may be inadequate to maintain ideal health levels. While the recommended daily dose of vitamin D, currently set at 400 IUs, stops rickets, many scientists suggest that three times that amount would be useful and wouldn’t risk an overdose.
Vitamin D can be obtained in food or manufactured in the skin by exposure to ultraviolet B radiation from the sun. The vitamin can be stored, but during winter months in temperate zones the supply dwindles. For bone health, Drake recommends that people in the Upper Midwest take vitamin D supplements during winter months and get an hour to an hour and a half of sun exposure each week in the summer. “We’ve become a society where we spend the vast majority of our time indoors,” he says. “It’s very hard to find what I call ‘free-range humans.’”
Found in: Body & Brain

- Lappe, J.M. et al. 2007. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 85 (June) p. 1586-1591.
- Wactawski-Wende J. et al. 2006. Calcium plus Vitamin D Supplementation and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 354 (Feb. 16), p. 684-696.
-
Drake, M. et al. 2009. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with inferior event-free and overall survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Abstract # 1953, American Society of Hematology 51st Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Dec. 5–8. Preliminary abstract available online at
[Go to]
- New data suggest a lighter Higgs
- Two is the magic number
- Researchers create global map of tree height
- Hole from on high
- Taming time travel



This is not funny. They know that these people are deficient in vitamin d but you are not going to do anything about it. Half this cohort are on there way to rickets. Don't think of it as a treatment for cancer, consider it as treating a vitamin deficiency. This is not about mega doses it is simply about returning them to the normal level. If this work is correct, 50% more people will survive. If they are wrong no one would be harmed, because you are not doing anything the body would not naturally do.
It also bugs me that these people have not read the literature, there are no cases of vitamin d intoxication below 10,000IU of D3 per day.
Please stop killing people with caution. While you are waiting for your gold standard proof people are suffering.
So, the doctor has decided to NOT treat a vitamin deficiency? Maybe his license should be reviewed. I can't think of a single disease that wouldn't be helped by correcting a vitamin deficiency.
[Link was removed]
this paper explains why we know 10,000iu/daily is safe even for people living in places of ample sunshine.
Grassrootshealth D Action provides postal 25(OH)D testing at cost price.
Most people will find around 1000iu/daily/D3 for each 25lbs weight is required to get status above the 55ng/ml levels associated with least disease incidence. As human bodies naturally attain levels around 60~80ng/ml people with a cancer diagnosis that this natural level may offer greater reserves of stored D3 to fight that condition.
The Vitamin D requirement in health and disease Robert P. Heaney
[Link was removed]
Actual measurable harm to the skeleton is measurable under 32ng/ml and not the 25ng/ml stated in the article.
In the past there has been concern re Vitamin D supplementation in lymphoma patients. For example, on the labeling for fosomax with D, lymphoma is listed as a possible contraindication- this is not included on the fosomax without D label.
Caution cited in various articles on the topic- one example
From The Truth About Vitamin D Toxicity
[Link was removed]
"Vitamin D hypersensitivity syndromes are often mistaken for vitamin D toxicity. The most common is primary hyperparathyroidism. Other syndromes occur when abnormal tissue subverts the kidney's normal regulation of endocrine calcitriol production. Aberrant tissues, usually granulomatous, convert 25(OH)D into calcitriol causing high blood calcium.
The most common such condition is sarcoidosis, oat cell carcinoma of the lung, and NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA (caps added) but other illnesses can cause the syndrome and they can occur while the patient's 25(OH)D levels are normal or even low.
For that reason, while rare, it is advisable to seek a knowledgeable physician's care when repleting your vitamin D system, especially if you are older, have sarcoidosis, cancer, or other granulomatous diseases.
In such high-risk patients, periodic monitoring of 25(OH)D levels and serum calcium will alert the physician to the need to do more tests-such as calcitriol or PTH-and take further action.
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
[Link was removed]
Please login or register to participate.