Advertisement

Science Friday
Bacteria seen swimming the electron shuffle
Researchers have captured the bacterium Shewanella's behavior on film
font_down font_up Text Size

New videos have caught bacteria in the act of a completely new behavior. A study appearing in the Dec. 14 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences finds that Shewanella cells briefly touch an electron-accepting surface, lift off and swim furiously, and then return to the metal surface.

The researchers call this flighty new behavior electrokinesis, and think it may be a way for bacteria to dump built-up electrons before taking off in search of food, much like a whale surfacing for a breath before diving. Understanding this frenetic movement may help scientists design better microbial fuel cells, which harness these electron-shuttling bacteria to produce energy.

“As far as we know, it is a new behavior,” says study coauthor and microbiologist Ken Nealson of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. “It’s a new way of thinking about what bacteria do. The really great thing is that it’s probably opened up 10 times more questions and created 10 times more hypotheses than we had when we started.”

Until now, Shewanella bacteria were thought to lead relatively simple lives, sometimes moving around and at other times sticking to a surface and depositing electrons on it. But the new study finds that the lifestyle of Shewanella is complicated.

In the new study, researchers led by Howard Harris also of the University of Southern California videotaped Shewanella cells as they came into contact with materials that could store electrons, such as manganese oxide and electrodes. From the movies, it became apparent that Shewanella cells were having what study coauthor Orianna Bretschger of the J. Craig Venter Institute in San Diego calls “touch-and-go” interactions with the surface. The cells “touch the surface, then quickly swim away, only to return again later for another fleeting interaction,” she says. What’s more, when researchers varied the electrode’s potential to accept more electrons from the bugs, the cells swam away even faster, the researchers found.

To show that the behavior was new, and not a form of chemotaxis, in which bacteria sense different amounts of chemicals in their surroundings, the researchers tested Shewanella mutants that lacked the genes necessary for chemotaxis. These mutants performed electrokinesis just as well as the normal cells, indicating that the new behavior is not like chemical sensing, Nealson says. The bacteria don’t need to sense and approach the electron-accepting surface before interacting with it.

Although the researchers don’t yet know why the bacteria engage in this behavior, one idea is that it helps the microbes balance the needs to breathe and to eat. Shewanella cells get energy by shuffling electrons to a surface that can accept them. In this case, the place where the bugs respire, or exchange electrons, may be different from where they find food. Bretschger likens the situation to an abalone diver who takes a breath of air and then dives deep down for the delicacy.

Since Shewanella cells respire on the surface of an electron acceptor such as metal, depositing all their electrons onto a metal is like taking a deep breath. With their electron storage tank empty, the cells are ready to swim away looking for food. As the cells’ electron sinks become full again, the cells return to the metal and dump their load.

The team “captured a very interesting behavior of Shewanella on film,” comments Jeffrey Gralnick of the University of Minnesota in St. Paul. Because researchers knew that Shewanella needed to offload electrons in order to get the energy to swim, the increased swimming after they bump into an electron acceptor “makes perfect sense,” he says.

Understanding this behavior may help scientists develop new microbial fuel cells, Nealson says. Such devices could generate small amounts of electricity while purifying water at a treatment plant. Swimming behavior is not ideal for such a system, so figuring out how to change the bugs’ behavior would be helpful. “This is exactly what you would like the bugs in the fuel cell not to do.”


Found in: Environment, Genes & Cells and Life

Comments 13
  • Other veterans of high school electrostatics campaigns may perhaps recall a demonstration in which an ungrounded conducting rod was brought near a small charged object suspended on an insulating string (one of many variations upon a theme of electrostatic induction: [Link was removed] ).

    As the rod approached within an inch or two, the charged suspended object was drawn toward the rod, but when they touched, the object sprang away very sharply. The explanation was that the charged object had induced an opposite charge on the nearest surface of the approaching conductor, the two moved toward each other because opposite charges attract, but when they touched, the charge redistributed itself so that they had the same charge, yet like charges repel, and so they sprang apart

    With this in mind, I think the behavior of Shewanella in these experiments ought to be recast.

    Bacteria sitting on a surface in a fluid have a serious problem getting access to nutrients because flow rates at even rapidly moving surfaces are essentially zero (as dirty fan blades attest). Some bacteria solve this problem by constructing a relatively long tether to the surface which allows them to put themselves out into the flow without being carried along by it (as certain bacteria almost universally found in the pipes leading to our faucets have recently been found to do).

    I think the reported experiments exhibit Shewanella's solution to this problem. When the charged Shewanella touches the electron accepting surface it is being attracted to by electrostatic induction, the charges equalize and the bacterium receives a sharp electrostatic kick out into the nutrient flow-- where it metabolizes, builds up another charge that attracts it to the conducting surface, and so on ad infinitum.

    From this point of view, the vigorous swimming it does after touching the electrode is an attempt to make the most of the electrostatic kick, somewhat the way ski jumpers do as they pole as hard as they can down the ramp. Ironically, the more vigorous swimming seen after touching a higher capacity electrode seems likely to reflect the fact that when charge equalizes after touching a higher capacity electrode, the local field strength will be reduced, and the kick received will be less-- and so the bacterium has to swim that much harder to get a similar separation from the surface.

    So, although it may be "exactly what you would like the bugs in the fuel cell not to do", I would go so far as to say that the the very raison d'etre of Shewanella using its metabolism to produce charge in the first place is to facilitate jumping out into the nutrient flow and then being drawn back to the conducting surface over and over again.


    james morgan james morgan
    Dec. 10, 2009 at 7:12pm
  • Other veterans of high school electrostatics campaigns may perhaps recall a demonstration in which an ungrounded conducting rod was brought near a small charged object suspended on an insulating string (one of many variations upon a theme of electrostatic induction: [Link was removed] ).

    As the rod approached within an inch or two, the charged suspended object was drawn toward the rod, but when they touched, the object sprang away very sharply. The explanation was that the charged object had induced an opposite charge on the nearest surface of the approaching conductor, the two moved toward each other because opposite charges attract, but when they touched, the charge redistributed itself so that they had the same charge, yet like charges repel, and so they sprang apart

    With this in mind, I think the behavior of Shewanella in these experiments ought to be recast.

    Bacteria sitting on a surface in a fluid have a serious problem getting access to nutrients because flow rates at even rapidly moving surfaces are essentially zero (as dirty fan blades attest). Some bacteria solve this problem by constructing a relatively long tether to the surface which allows them to put themselves out into the flow without being carried along by it (as certain bacteria almost universally found in the pipes leading to our faucets have recently been found to do).

    I think the reported experiments exhibit Shewanella's solution to this problem. When the charged Shewanella touches the electron accepting surface it is being attracted to by electrostatic induction, the charges equalize and the bacterium receives a sharp electrostatic kick out into the nutrient flow-- where it metabolizes, builds up another charge that attracts it to the conducting surface, and so on ad infinitum.

    From this point of view, the vigorous swimming it does after touching the electrode is an attempt to make the most of the electrostatic kick, somewhat the way ski jumpers do as they pole as hard as they can down the ramp. Ironically, the more vigorous swimming seen after touching a higher capacity electrode seems likely to reflect the fact that when charge equalizes after touching a higher capacity electrode, the local field strength will be reduced, and the kick received will be less-- and so the bacterium has to swim that much harder to get a similar separation from the surface.

    So, although it may be "exactly what you would like the bugs in the fuel cell not to do", I would go so far as to say that the the very raison d'etre of Shewanella using its metabolism to produce charge in the first place is to facilitate jumping out into the nutrient flow and then being drawn back to the conducting surface over and over again.


    james morgan james morgan
    Dec. 10, 2009 at 7:12pm
  • James, sadly the author of the article, and maybe the researchers themselves, had nothing to say about the polarity of the electrode used. The role of polarity is determinant in the changing direction of rotation of the microbial tale rotor, and the rotor of the ATP-synthase complex. Polarity is extremely important to understanding electrochemistry. It tells us your account supplements that of the author, for whom it would be speculation, not reporting. Another account would be this, that the historical understanding of bioelectricity, and therefore electrokinesis, is poorly informed in that it switches the polarity-labeling on redox coupling as to what is happening to an electron. The microbe does not deposit an electron on the electrode or metal surface, but instead accepts one from that surface as its surface digestive-enzymes, containing acids, touch that surface. The microbe is recharging in this touch-and-go interaction. The boys at the Craig Venter Institute didn't disclose then that the electrode used to increase the swimming was the anode of the DC, which provides electrons. They thought it was the cathode, or maybe the 'trode. The microbe is indeed like a battery, but a secondary cell whose primary aspects resemble capacitative discharge.
    Gregory O'Kelly Gregory O'Kelly
    Dec. 12, 2009 at 6:58pm
  • I don't know much about electrochemistry or bacteria, but from an electronic technician's point of view, it sounds like their electrode is a ground with a potentiometer, and the bacteria are grounding themselves and them swimming off frantically. Does anyone consider the possibility that these little guys are merely positioning themselves as the conduit for electtrons to flow from the container of fluid to ground and then jumping around to break the electron flow like any other living creature? Wouldn't there be a steady drain of electrons from the fluid to ground and these bacteria are just getting in the way and 'feeling' the jolt?
    Besides, when they swim off to 'get more electrons' where do those come from except within the container itself?
    It seems to this uneducated layman that the only way to truly know whether these bacteria are acting as capacitors and collecting then depositing electrons, is to measure their potential before and after. Just bring in some guys from the Intel lab to provide some nanometer traces and you might find a way.
    Todd McCall Todd McCall
    Dec. 14, 2009 at 4:35am
  • Actually, Gregory, they said it was 'Electron Accepting' - or of Positive Polarity.
    This makes sense; as, letting lose of ones extra electrons, would enable the cells of any living organism to take up more Protons! Protons make the world go round!
    James Staples James Staples
    Dec. 17, 2009 at 5:31pm

  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat
    Jan. 3, 2010 at 10:16pm


  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat m9bnat
    Jan. 5, 2010 at 7:31pm
  • Was very useful article. Thank you.. [Link was removed]
    asda asdasd asda asdasd
    Jan. 10, 2010 at 7:33pm
  • buy acyclovir
    [Link was removed]
    nikol kolo nikol kolo
    Jan. 14, 2010 at 8:00am
  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    Science News Science News
    Jan. 14, 2010 at 5:52pm
  • [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    [Link was removed]
    shooq wdq8 shooq wdq8
    Jan. 18, 2010 at 12:35am
  • [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]
    shooq wdq8 shooq wdq8
    Jan. 18, 2010 at 12:37am

  • [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]

    [Link was removed]
    shooq wdq8 shooq wdq8
    Jan. 18, 2010 at 12:43am
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.

Advertisement
Citations & References :
seperator
  • Harrisa, H.W., et al. In press. Electrokinesis is a microbial behavior that requires extracellular electron transport. Proceedinfgs of the National Academy of Sciences. doi/10.1073/pnas.0907468107
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator