Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
EPA: Greenhouse gases still endanger health
A+ A- Text Size

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: December 7, 2009

In April, the Environmental Protection Agency announced that based on its reading of the science, greenhouse gases threaten public health. Since then, the public and legions of interest groups have weighed in on the subject, shooting EPA some 380,000 separate comments. “After a thorough examination of the scientific evidence and careful consideration of public comments on the ruling,” EPA today reiterated its so-called “endangerment” assessment of greenhouse gases.

This afternoon's announcement paves the way for the agency to regulate greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, under the Clean Air Act. The timing of this pronouncement also appears to signal the Obama administration’s intent to get tough on climate. As tough as Congress will allow, anyway.

Currently, traffic contributes almost one-quarter of total U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions. EPA now intends to finalize greenhouse-gas emissions standards that it proposed earlier this year for new light-duty vehicles (ie cars, SUVs and light-duty trucks). It was part of a joint rulemaking with the Department of Transportation.

The proposed standards are intended to cut U.S. greenhouse emissions by nearly 950 million metric tons – and the use of 1.8 billion barrels of oil – over the life of vehicles built between 2012 and 2016.

“These long-overdue findings cement 2009’s place in history as the year when the United States government began addressing the challenge of greenhouse-gas pollution and seizing the opportunity of clean-energy reform,” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said today.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

EPA. The Plain English Guide to the Clean Air Act. [Go to]

Lisa P. Jackson. 2009. Prepared Remarks on the Endangerment Finding on Greenhouse Gases. Environmental Protection Agency (Dec. 7). [Go to]

Comments (2)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Here's a twofer:
    Deeds in Greenland describe 4 Viking dairy farms now under glaciers. Musta been warmer then, huh? CO2-free ....

    The slope (speed of warming) of the last 3 30-year cycles is identical. So--no "unprecedented speed", and CO2 had NOTHING to do with the first two, and hence NOTHING to do with the latest one.

    The whole Warmist movement is, as Lord Monckton rightly names it, 'Racketeering', and should be prosecuted as such.

    Further note: in geo-historical terms, the Earth is currently suffering from a "CO2 famine", and would do much better if levels were 2-10X as high. Unfortunately, the natural system that causes such changes is far too robust for humans to influence.
    Brian Hall Brian Hall
    Dec. 13, 2009 at 6:23pm
  • How do we know that a warmer earth is bad anyway?
    Robert Cannon Robert Cannon
    Dec. 29, 2009 at 4:44pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us