Web edition: December 18, 2009
Print edition: January 2, 2010; Vol.177 #1 (p. 32)
A half century ago, British scientist and novelist C.P. Snow lamented the divisions between natural scientists and humanities scholars of his day in his lecture The Two Cultures. In Kagan’s latest book, the Harvard psychologist expounds on Snow’s analysis with an insightful description of the strengths, shortcomings and potential of 21st century academic culture.
The Three Cultures revisits the natural sciences and humanities but also considers the place of social sciences in the modern academy. Kagan begins by examining differences among the cultures, right down to their vocabularies. The word fear, for instance, means one thing to a biologist, another to a psychologist and holds still another meaning for the poet, Kagan explains.
The book next examines how those differences play out. Kagan contrasts the veneration earlier natural scientists enjoyed with the increasing skepticism of today, explaining how political and historical events contributed to this decline in stature. He describes social scientists’ struggle to differentiate their scholarship from that of natural scientists. In perhaps the most polemic section of the book, he calls on economists to relinquish their claims of exactitude.
Snow argued 50 years ago that rivalries between natural scientists and humanists prevented scholars from tackling the world’s most pressing problems. The same gulf exists today among the three cultures, Kagan argues convincingly. With Kagan’s evenhanded assessment, the reader is led to one important conclusion: Scholars in each branch cannot afford to exist in isolated ivory towers.
Cambridge University Press, 2009, 311 p., $21.99.
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
The Capitalism-Technology-Guild-Tradeunion Culture
A 2010 New-Year Dream
A. Book Review: The Three Cultures: Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21st Century by Jerome Kagan
[Link was removed]
Review by Rachel Zelkowitz
"Snow argued 50 years ago that rivalries between natural scientists and humanists prevented scholars from tackling the world’s most pressing problems. The same gulf exists today among the three cultures, Kagan argues convincingly."
B. Today's gulf is between science and most humans, including "scientists"
The gulf that exists today is not just "rivalries among the three cultures" as "Kagan argues convincingly". Today's gulf is between science and most humans.
Snow's and Kagan's "cultures" are few of the artificial subdivisions in Western culture. Today's major human culture is the 20th century CTGT Culture, the capitalism-technology-guild-tradeunion culture, a conglomerate of a capitalistic political-economic sub-culture plus an absurd capitalistic economically collapsing industry-technology culture plus a science-choking AAAS guild culture in which the American Association Against Science doubles as God's science-apostle on Earth and its devoted flock's trade union.
C. United we survive and thrive, divided we fall and disintegrate
Two major factors have been preventing scientists-scholars from tackling the world’s most pressing problems during the the 20th-21st centuries, rendering them irrelevant to humanity's welfare progress.
- First: there is no Science except for the Establishment's Guild alone, and Peer Approved is the stablishment's only apostle.
The Science Guild Establishments, since its Mount Sinai Revelation as AAAS, has been prostituting all aspects of science, including the meanings of the terms science, scientists and research. It monopolizes all terminology and publications of information, blocking insights and evolution of science. It concentrates on enhancing its political and financial leverage in cahoots with the prevailing political, industrial, financial, academic etc., sectors.
It has turned the organization and activities of "organized science" into a ludicrous caricature of a corrupt trade union. This is the origin and explanation of the circa 100 years old black hole in science and of the near zero effect of science on societal evolution during the currently still ongoing 20th century CTGT culture.
- Second: Humanity, even with its Western culture phenotypes, has not yet internalized that divided we fall and disintegrate. It persists in a fierce Darwinian competition existing mode, each physiologic and cultural and sectional and XXXal phenotype fiercely struggling to gain a larger share of the survival means, of life's energy, at the expense of other human phenotypes.
This is universally rational, since this is the nature of cosmic evolution including life's evolution, to gain and ingest as much energy as possible from other mass formats in order to survive. But for Humanity this is irrational, as Aesop and others have been pointing out through human history.
D. Is there a naive delusive hopeful way out of the human herd race to its genotypic calamity?
Perhaps. Maybe. A democratic regime in which members of the government and public services do NOT represent interests of specific sub-sections of the pupulation. May be united we might survive and thrive...
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.