Advertisement

Science Friday
Ancient dawn's early light refines age of universe
Satellite images reveal new aspects of Big Bang's relic radiation
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Cosmic dawnNew maps of temperature and polarization in the distant universe confirm the existence of hot and cold spots in the cosmic microwave background radiation left over after the Big Bang. Rings around the spots reveal acoustic waves that were generated only in the early universe. NASA / WMAP Science Team

Six papers posted online present new satellite snapshots of the earliest light in the universe. By analyzing these images, cosmologists have made the most accurate determination of the age of the cosmos, have directly detected primordial helium gas for the first time and have discovered a key signature of inflation, the leading model of how the cosmos came to be.

The analysis, based on the first seven years of data taken by NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, also provides new evidence that the mysterious entity revving up the expansion of the universe resembles Einstein’s cosmological constant, a factor he inserted but later removed from his theory of general relativity. In addition, the data reveal that theorists don’t have the right model to explain the hot gas that surrounds massive clusters of galaxies.

Researchers studying the light, which was generated at the birth of the cosmos but was seen by the satellite as it appeared when it first escaped into space about 400,000 years later, unveiled the findings in six papers posted at arXiv.org online January 26. The ancient light, known as the cosmic microwave background, is peppered with hot and cold spots, signs of the tiny primordial lumps from which galaxies grew.

To calculate the age of the universe, scientists including David Spergel of Princeton University and Charles Bennett of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore compared the size of those hot and cold spots today with the size of the spots when the radiation was first released into space. Using data from WMAP along with studies of distant supernovas and other phenomena, the team finds that the universe is 13.75 billion years old, give or take 0.11 billion. (By comparison, the team’s previous calculation, which used the same method but included only five years of satellite observations, had pegged the universe at 13.73 billion years, plus or minus 0.12 billion.) 

access
Universal StatsA. Nandy

Data from the WMAP satellite supports the idea that the early universe inflated rapidly, Bennett says. Inflation theory, which posits that the universe ballooned from subatomic scale to the size of a soccer ball during its first 10-33 seconds, has had great success in explaining the structure of the universe. According to the theory, fluctuations in the intensity of microwave background radiation over larger spatial scales should be slightly bigger than those on smaller scales. The satellite, which was launched in 2001 and will make its last observations this fall, has confirmed that behavior.

“This is a really strong endorsement for the theory," says Scott Dodelson of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill. 

The standard model of cosmology — replete with inflation, invisible material known as dark matter and something called dark energy, which is believed to accelerate cosmic expansion—“is a wild idea,” admits Bennett. But with the newest analysis of the satellite observations “we have confronted the model against the data in a substantially new way… and this picture is holding up very well.”

By using the satellite data to measure the speed of acoustic oscillations — the cosmic equivalent of sound waves — astronomers have confirmed that the early universe forged helium in addition to hydrogen, just as the Big Bang theory has long predicted. Previous studies were based on the amount of helium present in the cosmos’ oldest stars rather than a direct detection of the gas in the early universe. 

"This opens up a new window for measuring primordial helium," Dodelson comments. 

The detection “is not a surprise, but it’s nice to have confirmation,” Spergel says.

Researchers also analyzed the satellite data to discern the diversity of neutral elementary particles called neutrinos in the universe. Physicists know of three types—the electron neutrino, the muon neutrino and the tau neutrino. But the current data would be consistent with the existence of either three or four types. The analysis of an additional two years of observations from the satellite may settle whether a fourth type exists, says Bennett.

In a separate finding, WMAP detected the abundance of microwave background photons in the vicinity of galaxy clusters. Here, the satellite has come into conflict with theory. Energetic electrons associated with galaxy clusters are known to interact with some of the microwave background photons, kicking the photons to higher energies than the probe can detect. As a result, the probe ought to record fewer microwave-energy photons in the vicinity of clusters.

The probe indeed records a deficit, but it’s only about half the amount predicted by galaxy cluster theory. The South Pole Telescope, a ground-based experiment that also studies the cosmic microwave background, also finds a lower-than-expected deficit. The mismatch suggests that theorists will have to revise their understanding of galaxy clusters, says Bennett.


Found in: Atom & Cosmos

Comments 6
  • "Physicists know of three types—the electron neutrino, the muon neutrino and the tau neutrino. But the current data would be consistent with the existence of either three or four types. The analysis of an additional two years of observations from the satellite may settle whether a fourth type exists, says Bennett."

    Three approaches to estimating the number of neutrino species described in the Komatsu paper put either 4 or 5 neutrino types within one standard deviation of the mean estimate, although four is closer to the mean estimate than five. Three neutrinos would be more than one standard deviation, but less than two standard deviations from the mean estimate (and is obviously a minimum number due to investigations by other means).

    It is a little hard to tell reading the article, but in places it appears that the neutrino species estimate is made based upon an assumed massless neutrino (which is probably mathematically simpler). If there is a correction for mass, it is subtle. If this is a correct read of the article, it could be that the inclusion of neutrino mass in the calculation based on best known values could change the number of neutrino species estimate.
    Andrew Oh-Willeke Andrew Oh-Willeke
    Feb. 2, 2010 at 7:16pm
  • Hi Folks;

    I consider it good news that the data are consistent with either 3 types or 4 types of neutrinos. If a fourth neutrino, or perhaps even a fifth neutrino exists, then one would consider that perhaps a fourth charged lepton or a fifth charged lepton would exist, as well as any associated 4th generation or 5th generation of quarks, perhaps resulting in a total of 8 or 10 quarks instead of the six known flavors which are paired two apiece in 3 families.

    Any new quantum-electro-dynamics, gauge theory modifications, or new quantum-chromo-dynamics, regarding additional particles could revolutionize theoretical particle physics and have ramifications for additional thermodynamic degrees of freedom in the operational physics of any manned interstellar space travel technologies.

    If supersymmetric string theory types of physics are real, then one would need to consider that perhaps additional Minimally Supersymmetric Standard Model like particles would or could exist. In such a case, the numbers of known bosons and fermions would be sufficiently great so as to suggest a possible sub-composition of these otherwise simple and fundamental particles: In short, we would be back to a particle zoo that existed during the early 1960s.

    I will not get my hopes up yet for any new flavors of neutrinos, but I will have to throw a party if one or more additional families of Standard Nodel like particles are discovered.

    Simplicity is a good mantra to go by in new paradigms, but nature also chooses variety.


    Regards;

    Jim

    James  Essig James Essig
    Feb. 2, 2010 at 9:12pm
  • Age of the Universe today and 400 years ago, when two-legged apes burned Giordano Bruno, is the same, it is infinite.
    CMB is not a "relic radiation". It is aether's (Space) black body emission, which was known 80 years ago. See for instance prof Assis's paper www . dfi . uem . br / ~macedane / history_of_2 . 7k . html
    Big Bang is a fairy tale of baron Munchgausen-Relativismus,
    who can measure universe without independent meter and can pop out themselves without any handhold.
    Please, regain consciousness! What do you do?!?!
    Karim Khaidarov Karim Khaidarov
    Feb. 3, 2010 at 6:14am
  • Maybe the LHC will lead the way in any type of SuSy extension.
    Jon Hanford Jon Hanford
    Feb. 3, 2010 at 6:45pm
  • Apparently my comment here was erased too, swallowed in the net without a burp.
    What I said was, first, thanks to Jim and Andrew for their learned comments (that I don't really understand.) And thanks to Karim for commenting, but wha? Bootstrapping is an accepted practice in writing computer code, so why not physics? I understand your reference to black body radiation, but I fail to see its relevance to the microwave background unless you are saying that the Universe is radiating inward. I also fail to see how a physical object like the universe can have an infinite age.

    Unfortunately, from the rest of your comment, Karim, it appears you are very disorganized, a condition which bodes ill for the deeper meaning of your assertions. Unless you have recently been stricken by lightning.
    Conrad Seitz Conrad Seitz
    Feb. 10, 2010 at 1:44am
  • Again: Dark Energy And Dark Matter YOK


    A. From "Ancient dawn's early light refines age of universe
    Satellite images reveal new aspects of Big Bang’s relic radiation."

    - "The ancient light, known as the cosmic microwave background, is peppered with hot and cold spots, signs of the tiny primordial lumps from which galaxies grew", And "(It is suggested) that theorists will have to revise their understanding of galaxy clusters".

    - The "universal composition" mantra is displayed, again, as 4.5% ordinary matter, 22.7% dark matter and 72.8% dark energy.


    B. From "No Dark Matter, No Maybe"

    - Enough is enough. Humanity has been hallucinating about dark energy and dark matter for circa 100 years.

    - The "tiny primordial lumps" grew NOT into galaxies, but into galaxy clusters.

    - "Galaxy Clusters Evolved By Dispersion, Not By Conglomeration".

    - "There's No Dark Energy Nor Dark Matter". All the initial singularity energy and matter is still there in space-distance, accounted for by E=Total[m(1 + D)] .


    C. And "Cosmic Evolution Simplified" accounts for the origin and nature of evolutionary biology via the cosmic gravity monotheism.


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Feb. 11, 2010 at 2:07pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.

Advertisement
Citations & References :
seperator
  • Bennett, C.L. et al. Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Are There Cosmic Microwave Background Anomalies? [Go to]
  • Jarosik, N. et al. Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Sky Maps, Systematic Errors, and Basic Results [Go to]
  • Weiland, J.L., et al. Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Planets and Celestial Calibration Sources [Go to]
  • Larson, D. Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Power Spectra and WMAP-Derived Parameters [Go to]

  • Gold, B. et al. Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Galactic Foreground Emission [Go to]
  • Komatsu, E. Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation [Go to]
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator