Web edition: February 15, 2010
It somehow seemed fitting that the eminent physicist Peter
Higgs was a no-show at a meeting of the American Physical Society, proving just
as elusive as the long-sought elementary particle that bears his name.
Quite understandably, Higgs, now 80 and one of six winners of
this year's J.J. Sakurai Prize for Theoretical Particle Physics, declined to
venture from England to snowy Washington to give a talk on his work.
Higgs first proposed in 1964 the existence of a subatomic
particle, later dubbed the Higgs, that could explain why the known elementary
particles have mass. Theorists believe that all particles were massless when
the universe was born but acquired mass a fraction of a second later after
interacting with a theoretical field known as the Higgs field.
Ever since, physicists have been looking for the particle
that generates the Higgs field. Most scientists have pinned their hopes on the
Large Hadron Collider, the giant atom smasher in Geneva that is scheduled to
resume regular collisions after more than a year's delay due to faulty
electrical connections. That's the good news. But to avoid the risk of further
electrical problems, researchers at CERN, the consortium that operates the
collider, recently announced the accelerator would operate at only half its
maximum power until 2013.
That could seriously delay exploration of some of the highest energy particles
the Large Hadron Collider can produce, including the proposed Higgs.
Although studies at Fermilab's Tevatron have narrowed the
range of masses that the Higgs can have — two new Tevatron papers on the Higgs
were posted here and here at the Physical Review Letters website on February 12 — the final word is still most
likely to come from the Large Hadron Collider. And for that, scientists will
have to wait awhile.
If the Higgs particle is found, Peter Higgs and his
collaborators will likely garner another award—the Nobel Prize—in addition to
the Sakurai.
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
, and it has not told mankind that for 2 months. CERN knows perfectly that Kaons are the atoms of strangelets and has withold that information till now, a week before itmakes experiments with 3 times more energy and will produce many more kaons.If CERN produces many more kaons and the strangelet ball reaches a stable mass, it will kill mankind.Now this is simple: e=mc2, the more energy the more mass, the more kaons CERN will do.At a certain point between now at 1 tev at 2013 at 1000 tev it will lump together enough kaons to make a stable strangelet and kill the Earth. This is unavoidable because 1000 times more 'unexpected kaons' will CERTAINLY make stable strangelets.The totalitarian principle of physics says that if something can happen it will happen.If you put a lot of atoms of iron you make iron, if you put a lot of kaons you make strangelet. Simple, isnt? Even t CERNerds can understand that?
We now have the experimental proof that CERN will kill us all somewhere between next week and 2013. And this is a the biggest possible holocaust of history. Is anyone going to do anything, or at least inform mankind since CERN is not being clear with this information? CERN has a wonderful marketing and PR department but the facts are straightforwards: CERN is doing massive amounts of strangelet atoms and it has not warned the world. CERN is lying. CERN is killing mankind.CERN has put all of us in death row.
The only question I have is, if this experimental proof that CERN will kill us all is so convincing, how come no other physicists are warning about CERN's genocidal activities? And a corollary question is, why do I have to read about it in the comments section of a Science News story? Shouldn't it be in the headlines of every major newspaper?
I'm exaggerating, but clearly the consensus of opinion is against you, luis sancho.
And It Takes E To Maintain m
A. "Higgs and his particle prove elusive"
Peter Higgs and colleagues receive particle theory prize; scientists still hunting the proposed boson
B. From "The Basic Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]"
Para B.3
"There is no call, no need, for a Higgs Particle.
The resolution of energy-mass superposition is reverted when D = 0. Shockingly sad, but must be soberingly faced rationally."
And see "An LHC Thinking Break"
"Cosmic evolution is also called particle physics or evolutionary biology or complexing or other terms. The LHC high-energy collisions will most probably advance our comprehension of it even if, as I expect, it will fail to demonstrate that the origin of mass in the universe depends on the hypothesized Higgs boson(s) and will fail to demonstrate the existence of dark matter or energy."
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
28Dec09 Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
Cosmic Evolution Simplified
Blame sciencenews for the missing references...
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.