Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Higgs and his particle prove elusive
A+ A- Text Size

By Ron Cowen

Web edition: February 15, 2010

It somehow seemed fitting that the eminent physicist Peter Higgs was a no-show at a meeting of the American Physical Society, proving just as elusive as the long-sought elementary particle that bears his name.

Quite understandably, Higgs, now 80 and one of six winners of this year's J.J. Sakurai Prize for Theoretical Particle Physics, declined to venture from England to snowy Washington to give a talk on his work. 

Higgs first proposed in 1964 the existence of a subatomic particle, later dubbed the Higgs, that could explain why the known elementary particles have mass. Theorists believe that all particles were massless when the universe was born but acquired mass a fraction of a second later after interacting with a theoretical field known as the Higgs field.

Ever since, physicists have been looking for the particle that generates the Higgs field. Most scientists have pinned their hopes on the Large Hadron Collider, the giant atom smasher in Geneva that is scheduled to resume regular collisions after more than a year's delay due to faulty electrical connections. That's the good news. But to avoid the risk of further electrical problems, researchers at CERN, the consortium that operates the collider, recently announced the accelerator would operate at only half its maximum power until 2013. That could seriously delay exploration of some of the highest energy particles the Large Hadron Collider can produce, including the proposed Higgs.

Although studies at Fermilab's Tevatron have narrowed the range of masses that the Higgs can have — two new Tevatron papers on the Higgs were posted here and here at the Physical Review Letters website on February 12 — the final word is still most likely to come from the Large Hadron Collider. And for that, scientists will have to wait awhile.

If the Higgs particle is found, Peter Higgs and his collaborators will likely garner another award—the Nobel Prize—in addition to the Sakurai.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (5)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • A strangelet is a ball of u-d-s quarks that catalyzes the creation of a supernova and can convert the Earth into a pulsar, a strange star. A kaon is the atom of a strangelet - a u-d-s quark. CERN has done an enormous number of 'unexpected' kaons at 1 tev of energy as per this post: web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2010/lhc-results-0205.html
    , and it has not told mankind that for 2 months. CERN knows perfectly that Kaons are the atoms of strangelets and has withold that information till now, a week before itmakes experiments with 3 times more energy and will produce many more kaons.If CERN produces many more kaons and the strangelet ball reaches a stable mass, it will kill mankind.Now this is simple: e=mc2, the more energy the more mass, the more kaons CERN will do.At a certain point between now at 1 tev at 2013 at 1000 tev it will lump together enough kaons to make a stable strangelet and kill the Earth. This is unavoidable because 1000 times more 'unexpected kaons' will CERTAINLY make stable strangelets.The totalitarian principle of physics says that if something can happen it will happen.If you put a lot of atoms of iron you make iron, if you put a lot of kaons you make strangelet. Simple, isnt? Even t CERNerds can understand that?
    We now have the experimental proof that CERN will kill us all somewhere between next week and 2013. And this is a the biggest possible holocaust of history. Is anyone going to do anything, or at least inform mankind since CERN is not being clear with this information? CERN has a wonderful marketing and PR department but the facts are straightforwards: CERN is doing massive amounts of strangelet atoms and it has not warned the world. CERN is lying. CERN is killing mankind.CERN has put all of us in death row.
    luis sancho luis sancho
    Feb. 15, 2010 at 8:45pm
  • Wow. So that explains why the Mayans predicted that the world would end in 2012.
    The only question I have is, if this experimental proof that CERN will kill us all is so convincing, how come no other physicists are warning about CERN's genocidal activities? And a corollary question is, why do I have to read about it in the comments section of a Science News story? Shouldn't it be in the headlines of every major newspaper?

    I'm exaggerating, but clearly the consensus of opinion is against you, luis sancho.
    Conrad Seitz Conrad Seitz
    Feb. 21, 2010 at 7:55pm
  • The physics community's acceptance that energetic particles, whether heat, light, x-ray, or gamma-ray, have no mass, goes back to an experiment run by Antoine Lavoisier in the 18th century. He weighed a cauldron of water, before and after heating it over a wood fire and found no sugnificant difference - QED : energy has no mass ! However, there was NOT then any scale capable of measuring the weight of the electrons added to that mass of cauldron and water, NO attempt to measure the vapor which escaped, and at temperature of escape. The difference of adding 1, 2, 3 electrons to every 18 gms. water would be 10 to minus 5, 4, 3 gms. Got your scale ready ? This in addition to not understanding the scope of a term in an much used equation at the end of 19th and early 20th century work by Boltzmann, Planck, and others since - means that the physics community will never understand mass - or "gravity" - until it gets away from the computers and starts OBSERVIING what's going on in the chemistry labs and Ketterle's and Jin's labs on BECs. The scientific world is about to see a revolution. Raymond A. Pohl
    Raymond  Pohl Raymond Pohl
    Feb. 22, 2010 at 7:59pm
  • Higgs Did Not Overcome D,
    And It Takes E To Maintain m


    A. "Higgs and his particle prove elusive"
    Peter Higgs and colleagues receive particle theory prize; scientists still hunting the proposed boson

    B. From "The Basic Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]"
    Para B.3

    "There is no call, no need, for a Higgs Particle.
    The resolution of energy-mass superposition is reverted when D = 0. Shockingly sad, but must be soberingly faced rationally."

    And see "An LHC Thinking Break"

    "Cosmic evolution is also called particle physics or evolutionary biology or complexing or other terms. The LHC high-energy collisions will most probably advance our comprehension of it even if, as I expect, it will fail to demonstrate that the origin of mass in the universe depends on the hypothesized Higgs boson(s) and will fail to demonstrate the existence of dark matter or energy."


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)

    28Dec09 Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]

    Cosmic Evolution Simplified

    Blame sciencenews for the missing references...
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Feb. 23, 2010 at 11:39am
  • I was doing work on Higgs boson and the field. It was difficult to work on. I give him a lot of credit for giving us the idea of the boson and the field.
    Nick Jenkins Nick Jenkins
    Mar. 7, 2010 at 4:26pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us