Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
The carbon footprint of industrial whaling
A+ A- Text Size

By Sid Perkins

Web edition: February 26, 2010
Print edition: March 27, 2010; Vol.177 #7 (p. 8)

PORTLAND, Ore. — During the 20th century, industrial whaling activities depleted a storehouse of carbon equivalent to the forests of New England, a new study suggests.

Whales, a group of mammals that includes the largest animals ever to live, are huge repositories of carbon. Individual whales pack on carbon as they grow, typically increasing in weight between 1 and 3 percent each year. In addition to their great heft — a blue whale can weigh around 90 metric tons — whales can store carbon in biomass for well over a century. “In marine ecosystems, whales are like forests,” said Andrew J. Pershing, a biological oceanographer at the University of Maine in Orono. He presented his research February 25 at the American Geophysical Union’s Ocean Sciences meeting.

Industrial whaling — the use of large engine-driven ships to efficiently harvest whales — commenced in earnest around 1900, Pershing noted. That year, he estimates, the oceans held about 110 million metric tons of whales.

Over the course of the 20th century, whaling transferred more than 105 million tons of carbon from living whales into the atmosphere — an amount that equates to about 385 million metric tons of planet-warming carbon dioxide.

Those emissions are small potatoes compared to the approximately 7 billion tons of CO2 emitted by human activities each year. “Whaling did not cause global warming,” Pershing said.

Nevertheless, Pershing noted, the carbon footprint of last century’s industrial whaling is equivalent to that produced by driving 128,000 Hummers for 100 years, or by burning 130,000 square kilometers of temperate forest — an area equivalent to all the forests in New England.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Pershing, A.J. 2010. Climate impacts on whales (and vice versa). Presentation IT44D-01 at the American Geophysical Union’s Ocean Sciences meeting. Feb. 22-26. Portland ,OR.
[Go to]


Raloff, J. 2000. Cetacean Seniors: Whales that give new meaning to longevity. Science News 158(Oct. 14): 254. Available to subscribers at [Go to]

Science & the Public : Whale hunts: Discussions on lifting the ‘ban’

Comments (8)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Well, I'm pretty much dead set against whaling, but contributing to the fight against the globe's CO2 famine is a mark in its favor.
    Brian Hall Brian Hall
    Feb. 28, 2010 at 1:54am
  • Carbon footprint is so pre-Climategate. Sid, buddy, it's over, find another looming disaster to peddle.
    ART DAY ART DAY
    Feb. 28, 2010 at 11:51pm
  • Great way to identify the clueless these days...just mark the ones that still believe in man-made global warming...do not trust them with anything.
    Jim Pitts Jim Pitts
    Mar. 1, 2010 at 8:23am
  • So does this mean we should promote human obesity? I can hear it now....."I'm not fat, I'm a carbon repository!"
    Ed Magowan Ed Magowan
    Mar. 1, 2010 at 1:15pm
  • Good grief, you people have paid subscriptions to Sciencnews, and this is how you think?

    We're doomed.
    hank hank
    Mar. 1, 2010 at 5:54pm
  • What's your point there Hank? Ed said it best. Eat my friend, till you save us all from......... the joke of the century. As for my subscription, when it expires I will need to look elsewhere for comedy. This hasn't been a science journal for some time now.
    william cesarano william cesarano
    Mar. 1, 2010 at 7:00pm
  • Hank, we're in a long-term battle against corals and diatoms, which are permanently sequestering CO2 as limestone and chalk. Since all living things are built of carbon chains built from atmospheric CO2, this theft is of the utmost concern. We will have to undo their dastardly efforts somehow!
    Brian Hall Brian Hall
    Mar. 1, 2010 at 10:15pm
  • This is a great article. However, Mr. Perkins fails add the relationship of the depleting whale population to global warming as whole. (IE: receding rain forests, carbon emissions from vehicles ect.) This is just one more thing to speed up the rate of carbon emission being put in the air due to man. Something needs to be done.
    Jacob Larson Jacob Larson
    Mar. 2, 2010 at 8:01pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us