Advertisement

Science Friday
Aluminum superatoms may split water
Metal clusters could create hydrogen for fuel, simulations suggest
Web edition : Thursday, March 4th, 2010
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Superatom breaks waterAn aluminum superatom (silver) produces hydrogen molecules (yellow) from water, a new simulation shows.Manaschai Kunaseth and Ken-ichi Nomura/USC Collaboratory for Advanced Computing and Simulations

Tiny clusters of aluminum atoms may be able to quickly extract pure hydrogen from water, a new simulation suggests. The results offer an incredibly detailed view of how the molecules react and may help scientists develop new ways to produce pure hydrogen-based fuels, researchers report in an upcoming Physical Review Letters.

Many energy experts consider hydrogen an ideal fuel, because mixing it with oxygen produces nothing but energy and water. But transporting and storing pure hydrogen is a safety challenge, and current methods of producing it on an industrial scale require more energy than the resulting hydrogen fuel contains. What’s more, that energy typically comes from natural gas, coal or other fuels that produce greenhouse gases. In order to reap hydrogen’s benefits, researchers need to find ways to create, transport and store it in a safe and sustainable way.

Computational physicist Priya Vashishta of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles is working on a way to eliminate the storage problem by producing hydrogen “on the fly.” He and colleagues from USC and Kumamato University in Japan generated complex computer simulations of a glob of 17 aluminum atoms suspended in water. This group of atoms, called a superatom, takes on special attributes that might change how the aluminum reacts with water molecules.

In their simulations, Vashishta and colleagues watched the water and aluminum molecules waltz through a choreographed routine. The effect, Vashishta says, was similar to watching characters dancing in a movie as the frames flicker by. Electrons and hydrogen ions moved around before the reaction ultimately produced three hydrogen molecules, each of which contains two hydrogen atoms, all in about 3 picoseconds. “The simulation tells us how the hydrogen is produced, and we can tell you absolutely, totally and completely the process by which it is produced,” says Vashishta.

Earlier experiments by other researchers have hinted that aluminum superatoms react with single molecules of water vapor. Small molecules such as the aluminum superatom have a high ratio of surface area to volume, giving them an advantage over bulkier substrates in reaction rates, Vashishta says.

Some regions of the superatom were hungry for electrons, while other regions wanted to give electrons away, the researchers found. As these sites began interacting with the surrounding water molecules, hydrogen atoms swiftly jumped from one oxygen partner to another, ultimately ending up on the aluminum superatom. After another series of complicated hydrogen bond switching events, a hydrogen atom then left the aluminum to join another hydrogen atom. The two hydrogen singletons were produced strategically close to one another, easing their ability to find each other and form a stable two-hydrogen molecule. Their closeness is “quite remarkable,” says Vashishta.

The results provide a more complete view of how tiny aluminum particles can catalyze hydrogen production. But these aluminum superatoms may not be a viable way to create energy, comments alternative-energy researcher Jerry Woodall of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind. “This is interesting science, but it’ll probably not see the realm of practicality in my lifetime,” says Woodall, who has worked on large-scale aluminum catalysts for hydrogen production.


Found in: Matter & Energy and Molecules

Comments 14
  • Would like to have heard from Jerry Woodall why aluminum superatoms may not be a viable way to create energy.
    robwired robwired
    Mar. 4, 2010 at 11:20am
  • I know. I know. You could explain it, but then somebody would have to clean my brains off the floor with a mop.
    Andrew Hardy Andrew Hardy
    Mar. 4, 2010 at 12:13pm
  • What is the oxygen by-product? Ozone?
    Brian Hunt Brian Hunt
    Mar. 4, 2010 at 1:32pm
  • robwired:

    Aluminum superatoms are not a viable way to create energy because energy is not created.

    It would have been nice to have Woodall follow up his claim with something like that. Any news about someone claiming a useful discovery in the field of producing Hydrogen from water ought to be followed with a standard disclaimer that physically impossible to make more energy than you put into it (not just that "current methods" have a net loss).

    The only way this would be useful is if it is extremely efficient so that the net loss is negligible in light of some other benefit from using Hydrogen to power things in other locations. However, there isn't any information in the article about the specific efficiency of this process.
    Carl P Carl P
    Mar. 4, 2010 at 6:49pm
  • Carl P & Robwired -

    I also would like to see a better explanation of this work. On the face of it, the article seems to portray something like a perpetual motion machine, though we must remember that what being produced here is hydrogen, not energy. A catalyst speeds or slows a chemical reaction, but that doesn't seem to be quite what Vashista is describng here. There would have been no reaction at all without the addition of the aluminum superatom , unless we're talking about random, slow degeneration of water molecules into H2 & O. I'm not sure that can happen, since water is a very stable molecule. So the second law of thermodynamics is, so far as I can see, being sidestepped here. The article does not explain where the energy to push this reaction came from. It had to come from somewhere.
    Robert Alderman Robert Alderman
    Mar. 5, 2010 at 7:41am
  • I will speculate (reason) from the statement that "Some regions of the superatom were hungry for electrons, while other regions wanted to give electrons away...." This describes a tiny charged battery with a cathode "hungry for electrons," and an anode wanting "to give electrons away." Once several water molecules break apart facilitating the electron transfers, the battery is discharged -- there is no more 'hunger for' or donation of electrons. This is not catalysis; once the energy stored in the superatom is used the reaction will stop. In order to separate more water, energy would have to be supplied to 'recharge' the superatom battery. Both the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics are satisfied.
    Guy Sperling Guy Sperling
    Mar. 7, 2010 at 2:40am
  • It look to me that this is a pseudo scientific findings. First of all aluminium react with water to produce hydrogen and Al2O3*H2On or Al(OH)3. The moment an aluminium covers in Al2O3 reaction with water cannot proceed any longer (inhibition). That's why aluminium looks not reactive. Now if we make an amalgam with mercury on a surface of aluminium and put it into a water the reaction will continue until the end to form H2 and Al(OH)3. Think about Aluminium as if it's Calcium or Sodium which hydroxides are soluble in water!
    denis spasyuk denis spasyuk
    Mar. 7, 2010 at 9:22am
  • Somewhere, energy must be input into this system to produce the hydrogen. My best guess is that either the aluminum requires energy to make (purify) and the aluminum is consumed in the process of producing hydrogen, or electricity must be pumped into this system to electrolyze the water. Or maybe some other chemical is present in the solution and is consumed.
    David Leithauser David Leithauser
    Mar. 7, 2010 at 10:54am
  • They are not claiming to produce energy for free. The aluminum would be a very nice catalyst, but the reaction would still be endothermic. If the reaction went fast enough or long enough to freeze the water, that would end it there. Additional heat would need to be supplied regardless. After bubbling out of the water the hydrogen and oxygen reaction products are intended for immediate use, to burn in an adjacent engine producing mechanical energy. The heat from burning them will convert them right back into h2o, but this can return back into the system only a fraction of the heat consumed by the original hydrogen producing reaction.
    Vincent Herr Vincent Herr
    Mar. 7, 2010 at 4:25pm
  • Aluminum has been known to produce Hydrogen from H2O for years, but the problem and expense of the process is the recovery of the vast amounts of Aluminum needed - especially if you wish to use this process for motivating automobiles ! Raymond A. Pohl
    Raymond  Pohl Raymond Pohl
    Mar. 7, 2010 at 8:07pm
  • I think that the lack of a simple statement of the reaction products and any simple description of the energetics of the process are a consequence of over-editing. Treating the reader as someone who has not had a single high school level course in Chemistry serves no rational purpose. Come on! This is SCIENCE News, and your target audience is educated enough to appreciate something more than sensationalist 'popular' science. Providing less wastes all of our time, and fosters speculative commentary as well. Raise the bar Science News!
    PKaczkowski PKaczkowski
    Mar. 9, 2010 at 1:51pm
  • The operative word in the article is "simulation".
    Dr. Momus A. Morgus Dr. Momus A. Morgus
    Mar. 11, 2010 at 5:30pm
  • I feel that it is a shame that such a theoretically simple process, potentially important for our energy future, gets so jumbled up and confusing - I know how Andrew Hardy feels with his comment to this topic! I work for a non-profit organization that produces educational science films for the benefit of the young scientist of tomorrow! We have a great video that simply explains the process of devising energy from the reaction between water and aluminum! Hopefully this helps clear up some of the debate! Since you can't use urls in these comments, check out labtv.com and look for the video titled "just add water."


    Anthony Sanudo Anthony Sanudo
    Mar. 15, 2010 at 2:15pm
  • Could a strong magnetic field perpendicular to a strong eletric field provide a method to prevent H+ H + O ion recombination if the Al clusters were imbebbed in a H2O permiable membrane?
    James  Young James Young
    Jun. 28, 2010 at 7:33pm
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.

Advertisement
Citations & References :
seperator
  • Shimojo, F., et al. 2010. Hydrogen production from water using aluminum-cluster catalysts. In press, Physical Review Letters.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator