Advertisement

Science Friday
Green-ish pesticides bee-devil honey makers
They appear to pose egg-ceptional risks
Web edition : Sunday, March 7th, 2010
font_down font_up Text Size

Pesticides are agents designed to rid targeted portions of the human environment of undesirable critters – such as boll weevils, roaches or carpenter ants. They’re not supposed to harm beneficials. Like bees. Yet a new study from China finds that two widely used pyrethroid pesticides – chemicals that are rather “green” as bug killers go – can significantly impair the pollinators’ reproduction.

Both chemicals are widely used in North America and elsewhere, including China. And, the researchers point out, the concentration of each pesticide that produced adverse effects in the experiments was at or below those that bees could encounter while pollinating treated crop fields.

In recent years, there’s been a big move by U.S. farmers to turn away from broad-spectrum potent bug killers to the more targeted and environmentally friendly pyrethroids. These synthetic chemicals have been fashioned after the natural pyrethrin bug deterrent in chrysanthemums.

The authors of the new study don’t argue that pyrethroids are a cause of colony collapse disorder, the mysterious die-offs affecting honeybees throughout North America. But they do argue that their findings suggest further investigation is warranted to confirm whether these immensely popular crop-protection chemicals might prove a previously unrecognized threat to pollinators. The source of a double-whammy, if you will, for already hammered bees.

Ping-Li Dai of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science and the Ministry of Agriculture led a team of researchers at those Beijing institutions together with a physiologist from the Second Military Medical University in Shanghai. The team investigated sublethal effects of bifenthrin and deltamethrin. Bifenthrin is used to kill everything from termites around homes to fire ants, corn pests and the mites that attack fruit trees. Deltamethrin is targeted at aphids, mealy bugs, whitefly, fruit moths, caterpillars on field crops, roaches, horseflies, mosquitoes and fleas.

After first establishing the dose that would kill no more than five percent of exposed bees, the researchers laced sugar water near bee hives with either of the pyrethroids at that tolerable dose. Worker bees had access for 20 days to the pseudo-nectar in each of three successive years. Queens in each colony were dosed every five days over each treatment period. Studied bees had no access to outside nectar during the trial periods.

Compared to queens receiving clean sugar water, those in the pyrethroid groups were substantially less fecund. For instance, clean queens in 2006 laid a little more than 1,200 eggs each day, compared to not quite 900 a day in the bifenthrin group and roughly 600 per day in the deltamethrin group. In general, the weight of eggs laid was higher in the pyrethroid-treated hives, but the hatch rate of pyrethroid-exposed eggs was significantly depressed. It varied by year, but in 2008, for instance, 88 percent of eggs in the control hives hatched versus 71.4 percent of those in the bifenthrin-treated hives and 80.5 percent of the deltamethrin-treated bees.

The success rate of hatchlings, that is the share that reached adulthood, varied from 75 to 95 percent in the control hive – making it between 20 and 40 percentage points higher than in hives where bees had been exposed to a pyrethroid. Dai and colleagues report their findings in the March Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry.

The bottom line, Dai’s team concludes: “The impact of pesticides on the colony may be severe.”

And the researchers concede that they can only guess at how severe because their paper focused on easily quantifiable, gross effects. Both pyrethroids are neurotoxic, typically causing paralysis and worse in target pests. The Chinese scientists didn’t investigate whether in-egg or juvenile exposures to the pesticides might have resulted in behavioral impacts during adulthood. Perhaps diminishing the bees’ ability to learn tasks or remember where good nectar sources were.

As I pointed out in a story four years back, pyrethroids may be relatively green – but they’re not totally benign to non-target organisms. That story was about little aquatic midges and other sediment dwellers. Essentially the food for fish and other critters people really care about.

Now we see threats to bees. And that should give all of us pause – because these unsung heroes of the farm make much of today’s bountiful harvests possible.


Found in: Agriculture, Environment, Science & Society and Zoology

Comments 4
  • This article is a little ridiculous. Pyrethroids aren't "green" because they don't kill off beneficials; they're green because they break down quickly and are chemical clones of plant-derived pyrethrins. If you understand the physiology of bugs, then you know how ion channels work, and mode and site of action for the pyrethroids. Anything with a system that pyrethroids work on will be killed off by the chemical. Good kill rate, too. That's why you read the label and apply when bees are not likely to be present. I think what you might be mistaking is the dose. The referenced bugs are smaller than bees and this usually leads to a lower dosage. If you go on to interpret that as "that amount is too small to kill bees", when then, you'll end up with lots of dead bees.
    Annie Scott Annie Scott
    Mar. 8, 2010 at 10:12am
  • The reporter needs to spend less time coming up with cute titles and sentences and more time on accuracy. Contrary to what is stated in the article, pyrethroids are broad spectrum insecticides. They are highly toxic to most insect species (including honey bees), but that doesn't mean that they present unacceptable risks to non-target insect species. Toxicity and risk are different. Pyrethroids are highly desirable because they break down quickly in the environment and the use rates are very low. Risks to bees can be managed effectively through timing of applications. The article also doesn't explain how the study's dosing regime would reflect real-world exposures.
    Robert Peterson Robert Peterson
    Mar. 8, 2010 at 11:44am
  • Actually, the article does talk about how the study's dosing regime reflects real world exposures. See second sentence of second paragraph.
    jar jar
    Mar. 8, 2010 at 5:09pm
  • @Robert Peterson:
    Perhaps Ms. Raloff uses clever titles to grab the readers attention. . .it obviously worked for you. Also - the reason that pyrethroids are considered to be narrowly targeted is because they're only supposed to be toxic to insects. If you want to get picky and say the effects encompass all insects, making them "broad," then fine. Otherwise, stop harassing the author. I found it interesting and informative...and I don't appreciate you trying to ruin her credibility over semantics.
    Emma Chure Emma Chure
    Mar. 14, 2010 at 3:16am
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.

Advertisement
Suggested Reading :
seperator
Citations & References :
seperator
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Pyrethroids and Pyrethrins Home Page. [Go to]
  • Dai, P.-L., et al. 2010. Effects of Sublethal Concentrations of Bifenthrin and Deltamethrin on Fecundity, Growth, and Development of the Honeybee Apis Mellifera Ligustica. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 29(March):644.
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator