- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
Opiates for the masses may not be far off. Scientists have figured out two of the final steps in the chain of chemical reactions that synthesize morphine in the opium poppy.
Pinpointing the cellular workhorses and the genes involved in making morphine may lead to new production methods for the drug and its chemical cousins such as codeine, oxycodone and buprenorphine, scientists report in a paper published online March 14 in Nature Chemical Biology.
Morphine and its relatives, widely used as painkillers in developed countries, are fairly expensive and are often taken for extended periods of time. The new research may lead to better ways of engineering yeast or other microbes to make these painkillers — perhaps skirting the social and political morass of agricultural poppy production, the source of heroin.
“Moving production of morphine and its metabolites such as codeine into a microbial system — if you could get yields up — could help lower costs,” says bioengineer Christina Smolke of Stanford University, who was not involved in the research. Instead of having to purchase these opiates from other nations, “maybe countries could even do local synthesis,” she says.
The new work identifies two enzymes — the proteins that cells use to build molecules and make reactions go — involved in turning the chemical precursors thebaine and codeine into morphine. Study coauthors Jillian Hagel and Peter Facchini of the University of Calgary in Canada also pinpointed the genes encoding each enzyme and verified this genetic role with poppy plant experiments.
“This is really terrific work,” says Philip Larkin, head of the plant product metabolic engineering program at Australia's national science agency CSIRO in Canberra. “Having these genes in the hand gives you much greater versatility.” For example, scientists could engineer high-yield plants by cranking up the activity of the morphine synthesis genes, Larkin says.
Scientists could also block morphine production with engineered viruses that shut down the genes. In theory, such viruses might be used to eradicate opium poppy crops in places such as Afghanistan. But narcotic control experts question the wisdom of such a maneuver.
“There are formidable tactical obstacles that would have to be addressed,” says Charles S. Helling, former senior scientific advisor to the State Department’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs. “But the even bigger problems are political,” he adds. “It’s a very difficult situation that is further complicated by the military situation.”
Morphine is an alkaloid, a class of compounds characterized by a ringed molecular structure incorporating a bit of nitrogen. “Among all the natural products, alkaloids tend to display the most potent pharmacological effects,” Facchini says. Plants produce roughly 12,000 kinds of alkaloids, including nicotine, strychnine, caffeine, mescaline, quinine and atropine.
A handful of very old plant groups, including the poppy and buttercup families, produce the class of alkaloids that morphine belongs to, called benzylisoquinoline alkaloids. The main building block for the roughly 2,500 alkaloids in this class is the amino acid tyrosine. A 15- to 20-step reaction pathway turns tyrosine into morphine. While questions remain about some of the very early reactions, pinning down the final morphine production steps is the key to unlocking a host of practical applications.
Years of research, gift plants, a bit of luck and the “Herculean effort” of then graduate student Hagel led to the discovery, says Facchini.
The researchers began with three high-morphine varieties of opium poppy, Papaver somniferum, and a mutant plant that makes the morphine precursors thebaine and oripavine but can’t make morphine itself. Hagel constructed an enormous DNA library from these plants, which the team used to determine which genes were turned on in the morphine-making poppies. She then compared this activity to that of the mutant plant that couldn’t put morphine together.
After determining the genetic blueprints of the genes that differed, Hagel and Facchini checked those DNA sequences against a database to reveal the enzymes’ identities. To verify the enzymes’ role in making morphine, Hagel stuck one of the genes into the bacterium E.coli, put the critter in a flask with some thebaine, and left it overnight.
“When she came back the next morning, the thebaine was all gone,” says Facchini. “That’s when her eyes got big…. Finding it all had been turned into morphine — that gives a grad student a great sense of power, when they can make morphine.” The scientists dubbed the enzymes thebaine 6-O-demethylase and codeine O-demethylase.
Both of the newly identified enzymes are in charge of the same structural task — removing a methyl group, a common chemical ornament comprising a carbon and three hydrogen atoms. But in the hunt for these morphine-synthesis enzymes, many scientists were led astray. There was an assumption that poppies used a methyl-removing enzyme similar to the one that the human liver uses to remove methyl groups. But poppies use enzymes from an entirely different class, the researchers report.
“These are enzymes that have eluded discovery for a long time,” says MIT biochemist Sarah O'Connor. And they turned out to be enzymes that weren’t really on the radar. “In plants, it’s very hard to figure out the enzymatic steps of a pathway,” she notes. “This is a beautiful example of how you can use modern molecular biology tools to solve this problem.”
Found in: Botany, Chemistry, Genes & Cells, Molecules and Science & Society

-
S. Milius. 2004. Morphine free Mutant Poppies: Novel plants make pharmaceutical starter. Science News. Vol. 166:13. [Go to]
-
Jillian M. Hagel and Peter J. Facchini. 2010. Dioxygenases catalyze the O-demethylation steps of morphine biosynthesis in opium poppy. Nature Chemical Biology. Online ahead of print. March 14. Doi: 10.1038/nchembio.317
- New data suggest a lighter Higgs
- Two is the magic number
- Researchers create global map of tree height
- Hole from on high
- Taming time travel



Going all in by increasing troop strength and nation building is resulting in more casualties and we are hobbled by a corrupt and incompetent Afghan government. We tried that at the beginning of our war in Vietnam. It failed.
Prolonging the status quo without adequate troop strength in many areas keeps us in a prolonged, slow-bleed situation, increases the number of “accidental guerillas,” makes our forces targets of opportunity and has no successful end game. We tried that in the middle of our war in Vietnam. It failed.
Finally, scaling back to engage simply in counterterrorism operations and giving the Afghan army/police a much larger role risks giving control of the countryside to the Taliban and reduces us to occupying cities. We tried that at the end of our war in Vietnam. It failed.
It appears that our thinking is locked into only lose-lose options and that the game is out of our control.
In the 1983 movie “War Games,” we are locked into a super computer-directed doomsday scenario game that can’t be stopped, the end result of which will destroy the world in a nuclear holocaust. The lead character, David (Matthew Broderick), who accidentally started this mess, realizes the only way is to create a paradigm shift and give the supercomputer a new game to play (tic-tac-toe), which ultimately teaches it the concept of futility, which shuts down the original deadly game. Better to play a nice game of chess.
How can we change the game in Afghanistan?
People like to make money, and the supply and demand cycle of the free-enterprise system is the most efficient and least dangerous way to do this.
To quote Fredric Bastiat, “When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will.”
According to BBC’s foreign correspondent David Loyn, Afghanistan’s last period of peace and prosperity, 1933-1973, coincided with the only significant period without invasion by foreign forces. Foreign involvement was benign and focused on investment. Afghanistan did well, for example, exporting more raisins than California and its women began to feel free by the late 1960s and early 1970s. There even was a Miss Kabul contest.
Let’s make the Afghans an offer they can’t refuse. Buy their farmers’ opium and sell it to international pharmaceutical companies who need opium base to make analgesic medications.
Opioid-based analgesics (e.g., Oxycodone) have been in short supply because pharmaceutical companies have difficulties getting enough legal raw opium to make these prescription medications. This results in more human suffering.
Afghan farmers are one of the world’s largest illegal suppliers of opium.
Our present policy is to poison their poppies, increase opium’s price and leave the profits to those who would create terror and fanatical oppression. Poisoning the poppies via compounds that shut down the genetic pathway that leads to opium is another exercise in futility.
We could change the game by setting up a free market system to buy raw opium and sell it to pharmaceutical companies. The reasonable and stable prices Afghan farmers would get should entice them to be our allies in a saner social and economic system and, since money usually trumps ideology, many insurgents would follow the money. Everybody from tribal leaders to the American government could get a cut of the profits. Rather than our military personnel going into the mountains to set up remote bases, those Taliban and Al-Qaida who would abhor this system would have to come out of the mountains to try to destroy it, an ideal situation made for our Predator pilotless aircraft and United States military snipers.
Buying Afghan opium is a capitalistic paradigm shift that even filmmaker Michael Moore would endorse. The only losers would be those who still support America’s anachronistic war on drugs policies.
We are currently lost in an Afghan game of futility and we must step out of the self-made box in which we’ve put ourselves. As Walt Kelly’s character Pogo said: “We have met the enemy — and he is us.”
Gene Tinelli
I am a military-trained psychiatrist who specializes in treating trauma and addiction disorders and have worked with military personnel and veterans for over thirty years. I am currently an associate professor at SUNY Upstate Medical Center and work part time with military spouses at Ft. Drum, NY.
Are you real? If so, have you ever heard of CANCER? CAR ACCIDENTS? SURGERY? BURNS?
My wife is suffering from stomach cancer right now. You may find this hard to believe but we had considerable trouble getting her pain treated AT ALL! That's how scared doctors are of the DEA Gestapo. You, sir, have bought into all their lies and made it easier for them to do the dirty evil work they do.
Morphine from poppies is relatively inexpensive and provides poor farmers with a much needed source of income.
Morphine produced in a lab is expensive and the resulting expense would deprive much needed treatment from the poorest patients.
It is unethical to take income from poor people and give it to educated lab workers.
We should know better, releasing an engineered virus into the environment to eraticate opium in poppies will have far reaching and unintended consequences that may not be reversable.
What would happen if the virus mutated and blocked the ability of plants to make other compounds? Would you like to only have decafinated coffee?
Please login or register to participate.