Advertisement

Vitamin D is a flu fighter
And new study hints at benefits for people with asthma.
Web edition : Tuesday, March 16th, 2010
Text Size

A little over three years ago, a San Francisco-area psychiatrist and several colleagues in other fields floated a provocative hypothesis: that a deficiency in vitamin D — the sunshine vitamin — might render people vulnerable to infections, including the flu. Now Japanese researchers offer tangible support for that idea. They show that vitamin D supplementation dramatically cut the incidence of seasonal flu among the children they followed.

Their double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was small. Only 334 children completed a three-month course of six pills per day — a dropout rate of almost one-quarter. Then again, that’s a lot of pills to make kids take each day to get just 1,200 international units of the vitamin. (Especially since the teeny capsule I down contains almost twice that much.)

But the supplementation certainly looked promising. Incidence of influenza A was 10.8 percent among the 167 kids who received vitamin D pills. That's in contrast to a flu rate of 18.6 percent among an equal number of children getting identical looking inert pills. Doctors monitoring the trial confirmed flu cases using a test to assay for the influenza-A germ.

The study has just been published online, ahead of print, in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Children with asthma may have benefited especially. Two asthma attacks occurred during the trial among kids getting the vitamin, compared to 12 in the unsupplemented group. Then again, the study doesn’t note how many kids with a history of asthma had been randomized into each arm of the trial. So it’s therefore possible that a comparable number of susceptible kids had not been present in each group.

Incidence of another strain of infection — influenza B — did not vary by supplement group, according to team leader Mitsuyoshi Urashima of the Jikei University School of Medicine in Tokyo, and colleagues. Then again, these researchers argue that any benefits of the vitamin might have been dampened by the timing of its administration. The trial began in December 2008, after the flu season had begun, and the researchers acknowledge that it may take almost three months “to reach a steady state of vitamin D concentrations by supplementation. Thus, December might be theoretically too late to start [a flu prevention regimen].”

John Cannell, the doc who came up with the idea that vitamin D might trammel flu, reports in his Vitamin D Newsletter, which came out Sunday, that "I hear through the grapevine that the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] has discovered that, of the 329 American children who have died so far from H1N1, vitamin D levels in the dead children were lower than in children who survived the swine flu." He offers no additional details.

Vitamin D — itself a misnomer since the active chemical is actually a hormone — seems to play a pivotal role in total body health. It not only helps build bone and muscle but has been linked to lower risk of gum disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer and autoimmune disease.

And the kicker: Most people in the developed world are chronically deficient. What’s more, those who have heavily pigmented skin, are overweight or who live in high latitudes face an aggravated risk of deficiency.

Indeed, a second new study due to appear in the same journal — this one by a U.S. team of scientists — reports that among a random sample of more than 3,000 postmenopausal women, almost 60 percent were vitamin-D deficient.


Found in: Biomedicine, Body & Brain and Science & Society

Comments 5

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • So, the closer to the equator, the less likely to get whacked by the flu?
    Russell La Claire Russell La Claire
    Mar. 17, 2010 at 7:05am
  • So, you set an unusually high/arbitrary level for Vitamin D, then test for it, then declare half of the population defficient. "Who could ask for anything more?", says the supplementation industry.
    JimStars JimStars
    Mar. 17, 2010 at 10:14am
  • Actually, people closer to the equator to appear to have lower incidence of flu, based on a review of papers in one of Cannell's earlier papers. It's part of what prompted the hypothesis. And there are plenty of studies that show higher circulating values of vitamin D lower risk of disease--lots of disease. And the comparisons are usually finding higher disease risk at those vitamin D concentrations typical of Westerners today. The industry isn't pushing more D--it's the biomedical research community that finds benefits. Keep in mind too that most people today probably get less regular sun exposure--and therefore make less D in their skin--than a century ago.
    jar jar
    Mar. 18, 2010 at 5:40pm
  • Re profit motive insinuations: Supplements only need quality, generic competition. 10,000 IU of vitamin D3 is only 1/4 mg of cholecalciferol. The bottle, gel cap and filler oil cost much more. With competitive volume distribution in larger bottles, even a 10,000 IU gelcap should only cost 1-2 cents each (research indicates feral humans made 10,000-20,000 IU per day in normal sun exposure). The greatest danger to the public is that proposed FDA drug regulation would typically drive these prices up 1-2 orders of magnitude, reducing practical availability. Introducing generic multivitamins with 1000-2000 IU would be a good starting point, cost negligible.
    ba nonymous ba nonymous
    Mar. 20, 2010 at 3:06pm
  • Much cheaper than sunscreen! Ask yourself this question: Sunscreen was introduced in the 1970s, since then skin cancers of all kinds have sky rocketed. Why is this? Does this mean sunscreens are a scam? well Duh! The traditional sunscreens blocked the UVb which causes Vitamin D to be produced in the skin and allowed the UVa which causes skin cancers to form...a double whammy, but don't look for the sunscreen companies OR the AMA OR the skin Dr.s to tell you the truth, too much money involved.
    Jim Pitts Jim Pitts
    Mar. 22, 2010 at 8:35am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Advertisement
Suggested Reading :
seperator
Citations & References :
seperator
  • Urashima, M., et al. 2010. Randomized Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation to Prevent Seasonal Influenza A in Schoolchildren. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (in press). DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.29094
  • Millen, A.E., et al. 2010. Predictors of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Among Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative Calcium Plus Vitamin D Clinical Trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (in press). DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28908
  • Cannell, J.A., et al. 2008. On the Epidemiology of Influenza. Virology Journal. 5(Feb. 25). doi:10.1186/1743-422X-5-29. [Go to]
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator