Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Army takes gun acoustics beyond ‘bang’
Dissecting sound of weapon fire may give soldiers an edge
A+ A- Text Size

Dissecting sound of weapon fire may give soldiers an edge

By Rachel Ehrenberg

Web edition: April 28, 2010

Distinguishing enemy from friendly fire is a challenge in the confusing, stressful throes of combat. Turns out it’s a challenge even under the controlled conditions of a weapons acoustics study.

Listeners can tell handguns from rifles, but telling one rifle from another is harder, U.S. Army researchers reported April 19 at a meeting of the Acoustical Society of America in Baltimore. Investigating exactly what auditory information listeners tune into might eventually help soldiers discern one weapon from another.

Army scientists are developing a model of gunfire acoustics and a database of the sounds of different weapons, reported Jeremy Gaston of the U.S. Army Research Laboratory. The hope is that recognizing acoustic information can become part of formal training, he said, and give soldiers an edge in combat.

In addition to providing clues about who is doing the firing, sound information can reveal enemies’ whereabouts and give clues to their resources, said Gaston, of the Army’s Visual and Auditory Processes branch in Aberdeen, Md. Sound is an underexploited arena that “provides information on the environment and can cue soldiers to potential danger,” he said.

To investigate what auditory information is most useful for discriminating among weapons, Gaston and his colleagues recorded shots fired from several weapons commonly used in combat, including an AK-47, an M16 rifle, an M4 rifle, a CZ 75 pistol and an M9 pistol, the primary handgun of the U.S. military. The team recorded the shots at three different angles from behind the shooter and then played the shots back to listeners, who judged the similarity of the sounds.

Listeners could discern the pistols from the rifles, but telling the long guns apart was much harder, Gaston reported. He noted, however, that the study group was hearing only single shot events. Because an AK-47 is fully automatic, the rounds don’t stop coming until the clip is empty, while the M4 and M16 typically fire three-round bursts, producing noise that is followed by a pause as the gun is reloaded. Listeners typically focus on a gun’s loudness, but information is also embedded in the pauses between shots. Soldiers can tune into that information as well, said Gaston.

Sounds such as clicks or other background noise may also help listeners make decisions in harried situations. “Once you understand what is going on, you can figure out what information will lead to the best judgment,” Gaston said.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Gaston, J. 2010. A three-stage approach to understanding listener perception of weapon signature for small arms. April 19 presentation at the spring meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Baltimore, Md.

Comments (2)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Let me assure you with great confidence that any vet can tell the difference between the "bang" of an M16 and the "bark" of an AK47. Frederic in Westminster
    Fred Coppin Fred Coppin
    May. 2, 2010 at 12:05pm
  • Somebody is asking the wrong person to listen to these gunshots. Naive listeners obviously can't distinguish a .223 from a .308; they need to bring in some veterans.
    Conrad Seitz Conrad Seitz
    May. 2, 2010 at 4:20pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us