Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
BP oil isn’t the only source of Gulf's deep roaming plumes
Some subsea plumes don't share the chemistry of BP's oil
A+ A- Text Size

Some subsea plumes don't share the chemistry of BP's oil

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: June 9, 2010

During a June 8 briefing for reporters, Steven Murawski, chief science advisor for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Fisheries Service, described deep strata of water tainted with oil. They were identified during a recent cruise in the Gulf of Mexico. A presumption had been that any clouds of oil hovering under the surface would be plumes spewed by the damaged BP well head. But the chemical fingerprinting of diffuse undersea oil clouds at one sampling site 142 nautical miles southeast of the Deepwater Horizon accident site was “not consistent with BP oil,” he pointed out.

Which begs the question: Where did this other oil come from — since Murawski noted that earlier research surveys of the area prior to the BP spill had turned up no subsea oil clouds.

At present there is no answer. But it should be noted that some recent news organizations around the gulf coast have lately begun reporting on a second leaking offshore gulf oil rig: the Ocean Saratoga.

Citing a federal document, Ben Raines of the Mobile, Ala. Press-Register reports that this well has been leaking since at least April 30.  He quotes John Amos of Skytruth, who heads a nonprofit remote-sensing organization saying that: “We accidentally discovered this [Ocean Saratoga] spill looking at the Deepwater Horizon images. The question is, what would we see if we were systematically looking at the offshore industry?"

Good point. And Amos is only focusing on surface signs of oil. In fact, there may be plenty of hydrocarbons spewing below the surface and soiling the deep waters. Which is why a number of research groups would like to see a regular marine-monitoring network developed throughout U.S. territorial waters, especially in near-shore areas.

Aerial and satellite surveys can scan the surface to map the size and guestimate the depth of floating oil. “What we have very little information about is what happens below the surface, noted Frank Muller-Karger of the University of South Florida during a May 19 briefing before the House Subcommittee on Energy and Environment. “We have no mechanism to measure what’s going on below the surface. We have no established network . . . to see what’s going on below."

See also: Gulf gusher is far and away the biggest U.S. spill

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Raines, B. 2010. Another Gulf oil spill: Well near Deepwater Horizon has leaked since at least April 30. Press-Register (June 8): [Go to]

Boehm, P.D., G.S. Douglas and J.S. Brown. Advanced Chemical Fingerprinting for Oil Spill Identification and Natural Resource Damage Assessments. Arthur D. Little, Inc. [Go to].

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Ms. Raloff is easily one of my top three favorite authors in Science News, but I wish she would not say "begs the question" when she means "raises the question." To "beg the question" is a logical fallacy where one makes an argument that assumes the truth of the thing one is trying to prove. So, to "beg the question" means to make an invalid argument. It's only in recent years that I have noticed the incorrect use of this phrase, but it seems to be getting more frequent.
    deuce deuce
    Jun. 10, 2010 at 4:26pm
  • Hey deuce...thanks for the feedback. Call me out on this whenever such hackneyed (and inaccurate) phrases creep in.
    jar jar
    Jun. 10, 2010 at 5:18pm
  • You have to admit it trips off the tongue (whatever *that* means).
    John Turner John Turner
    Jun. 11, 2010 at 2:53am
  • My question about this story is, is anyone routinely logging the chemical fingerprints of tapped offshore oil formations so that all leaks can be explicitly traced back to their source? Somebody like NOAA or the MMT or EPA or UL Environment or the Gulf states? Anybody? Anybody with a collection of 50ml jars on your desk? Anyone?
    John Turner John Turner
    Jun. 11, 2010 at 3:00am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us