Advertisement

Science Friday
Swarming locusts impossible to predict
Mathematical analysis shows that insects travel to the beat of their own drum
Web edition : Friday, July 23rd, 2010
font_down font_up Text Size
access
SWARM BREWINGThe desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, can rapidly switch from a solitary insect to part of a swarming mass. Physicists are studying how that change occurs in hopes of better controlling locust plagues.Gabriel Miller

Mathematicians have now figured out the dynamics that drive locusts across the landscape, devastating everything underfoot — and the math says people will never be able to predict where the little buggers will go.

The new analysis, reported in an upcoming issue of Physical Review E, suggests that random factors accumulate and influence how swarming locusts collectively decide to change course.

“These swarms are driven by intrinsic dynamics,” says team member Iain Couzin, a biologist at Princeton University. “In all practical terms, predicting when a swarm is going to change direction is going to be impossible.”

Still, others say the information may one day allow researchers to better inform locust-control efforts — for instance, by suggesting the best times and places to apply insecticide ahead of an approaching swarm.

Desert locusts, Schistocerca gregaria, normally live in arid parts of Africa and Asia but can explode over millions of square kilometers during plagues, as happened during the late 1980s. Researchers understand much of the basic biology behind locust swarms — even how the insects change color as they mass together — but the physics describing their collective behavior has been something of a mystery.

That began to change a few years ago, when an interdisciplinary group of mathematicians, biologists and others were inspired to look at the basic physics of locust swarming. By putting more and more locusts into a ring-shaped arena 80 centimeters in diameter, the team watched as, at a critical density, the locusts switched from wandering around on their own to behaving as a group.

In new work, Carlos Escudero of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas in Madrid looked further at the mathematics underlying this change in behavior. From watching locusts in the arena he and his colleagues came up with an equation, called a Fokker-Planck equation, that describes how the density of particles (or in this case, insects) changes over time.

Further analysis showed that a number of random factors influence when the insects decide to change direction. Mathematically, the change in the locusts’ direction is similar to switches in magnetic properties that occur among clumps of magnetic particles at high temperatures, Escudero says. In both cases, random influences accumulate until suddenly the whole system changes its behavior.

“It’s impossible to know when the next switch will happen,” Escudero says. “Still, we have a little bit more understanding on how these perturbations are produced, and we hope that in the long run we can apply this practically.”

Jerome Buhl, a biologist at the University of Sydney in Australia, notes that swarming locusts typically start their morning in a dense clump and spread out over the course of the day. The best time to target spraying, he says, might therefore be right after the insects start marching, because over time their behavior will become less predictable.

“What we need to do now is to work out the maths behind this,” Buhl says, “and we’ll be able to determine which way to lay the barriers ahead of a band to more likely be optimal, potentially saving on the amount of insecticide used and minimizing the impact of control.”

Buhl and other researchers are gearing up for an imminent expected plague of a different locust species in Australia. The team plans to glue tiny reflectors to locusts, then fly unmanned aerial vehicles over the swarms to track the behavior of individuals within the group.


Found in: Environment, Life, Numbers and Physics

Comments 5
  • Would the behaviour not be like a school of fish, with the flow of air temp, moisture, and density be part of the guiding swarm behaiour? As with fish there is also threat of being pray to larger fish, with the swarm there would be threat of being eaten help change the swarm direction?
    Robert Scheff Robert Scheff
    Jul. 23, 2010 at 6:46pm
  • Impossible to predict as they are alive and conscious.
    Hans Moleman Hans Moleman
    Jul. 24, 2010 at 9:57am
  • That their direction can't be determined is the key; thus the practicality seems to be limited. So determine their direction for the little buggers. Drop (from a drone) 100 really nice Super Locust into an existing swarm. I'm not entirely sure what would create a Super Locust. Make them bigger, shinier, faster, louder, redder in color, maybe larger lips – whatever, to mimic what makes a locust decide to follow another locust. Fly them equidistant from each other and cover the entire swarm. Make each of them do whatever is necessary to change the direction of the locusts around them. Then have the Super Flies all fly in the same direction to direct the others around them to fly in the same direction. Then steer them away from folks, crops, livestock, whatever, and fly them right into traps instead.
    After you fly a swarm into a net you get the fake bugs out and drop them into the next swarm.
    You could steer 4 swarms to create synchronized swarming!

    Dear Australian Government,
    Please contact me to build the Super Bugs.
    Thanks,
    Scott
    S S S S
    Jul. 24, 2010 at 2:50pm
  • If any cues or environmental signals which influence direction can be identified, it might be possible to redirect the swarms into killing zones. Worth a try!
    Brian Hall Brian Hall
    Jul. 25, 2010 at 6:06pm
  • This is important because it exemplifies what we might call free will, a term which must, I think, pertain to an entity with a lot of internal state and some randomness. Those attributes are necessary but obviously not sufficient. For an entity to have what we might like to call free will, it would need some freedom, which seems to imply at least a small amount of randomness, along with quite a bit of will, which seems to imply complexity as well as plenty of state.
    Ralph Dratman Ralph Dratman
    Jul. 26, 2010 at 12:52am
Post a comment (Please note: All links will be removed from comments.)

Please login or register to participate.

Advertisement
Suggested Reading :
seperator
  • Ehrenberg, R. Pigeons usually let best navigator take the lead. Science News Online, April 7, 2010.
    [Go to]
  • Milius, S. Swarm savvy. Science News. Vol. 175, May 9, 2009, p. 16.
    [Go to]
  • Sanders, L. Schools make fish smarter. Science News 174, December 20, 2008, p. 12.
    [Go to]
  • Klarreich, E. The mind of the swarm. Science News. Vol. 170, November 25, 2006, p. 347.
    [Go to]
Citations & References :
seperator
  • Escudero, C. et al. 2010. Ergodic directional switching in mobile insect groups. Physical Review E. in press.
  • Yates, C.A. et al. 2009. Inherent noise can facilitate coherence in collective swarm motion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 106, 5464.
    [Go to]
  • Buhl, J. et al. 2006. From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science. 312, 1402.
    [Go to]
  • Play a computer game involving cannibalistic locusts:
    [Go to]
Reader Favorites:
seperator
SN on the Web:
seperator