Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
New data suggest a lighter Higgs
Fermilab results heat up race for an elusive particle
A+ A- Text Size

Fermilab results heat up race for an elusive particle

By Ron Cowen

Web edition: July 26, 2010
Print edition: August 14, 2010; Vol.178 #4 (p. 16)

Enlarge
Combined data from two experiments at the Fermilab's Tevatron particle accelerator indicate that the elusive Higgs boson — known as the God particle — does not have a mass between 158 and 175 GeV.
Fermilab

The God particle has fewer places to hide.

New data offer evidence that the heft of the Higgs particle lies somewhere in the low end of the range being probed by particle colliders on two continents. The results also hint that the particle’s mass may be consistent with supersymmetry, a theory that gives every particle in the standard model of physics a much heavier partner.

The latest results come from two ongoing experiments at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory's Tevatron particle accelerator in Batavia, Ill., that suggest the elusive Higgs cannot have a mass between 158 billion and 175 billion electron volts. (1 billion electron volts, or 1 GeV, is just slightly heavier than the mass of a proton.) Ben Kilminster of Fermilab reported the finding July 26 at the International Conference on High Energy Physics in Paris.

Studies from the Large Electron-Positron Collider, which shut down in 2000 at the European research organization CERN, along with indirect constraints from both theory and experiments, had indicated that the Higgs could have a mass anywhere between 114 and 185 GeV. In late 2009, the two Tevatron experiments, known as CDF and DZero, excluded the range between 162 GeV and 166 GeV. With the new constraints, CDF and DZero have now ruled out nearly 25 percent of the mass range for the Higgs allowed prior to 2009, before the two experiments began weighing in on the proposed particle.

Dubbed the God particle because its existence would explain why some subatomic particles are weightless but others are not, the existence of the Higgs particle was proposed in 1964 by physicist Peter Higgs, who posited a quantum field pervading the vacuum of space. The field would slow down some particles traveling through it, causing them to acquire mass. Other particles, like photons, would be impervious to the field and continue to travel at the speed of light. Although the field couldn’t be detected directly, it could be excited at high energies to produce the elusive Higgs particle.

The newest limit on the particle’s mass “is important, as it demonstrates the power of the Tevatron experiments to search for the Higgs,” says theorist JoAnne Hewett of the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in Menlo Park, Calif. “They just keep getting better and better.”

However, Hewett notes, excluding the region between 158 to 175 GeV for the mass of the Higgs won’t have much effect on theory, because most physicists expect the Higgs to be lighter than 135 GeV.

“The most tantalizing region of 114 to140 GeV has yet to be explored,” Hewett notes.

That’s why intriguing, but not statistically significant, hints of a 140-GeV Higgs recorded by Tevatron’s CDF experiment “has the theory community abuzz,” Hewett says. Abid Patwa of the Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, N.Y., presented that data July 23 at the ICHEP meeting.

CDF cospokesman Rob Roser of Fermilab says, “We see something. It could be consistent with many things,” including a low-mass Higgs. “I am not sure I would agree that ‘the community is all abuzz,’ but perhaps the theorists are excited — they are an excitable lot.”

Physicists are intrigued by a low-mass Higgs because it would most easily fit into one of the simplest extensions of the standard model of particle physics, known as minimal supersymmetry. Supersymmetry supposes that every known particle has a heavier partner. The minimal version of that theory has the smallest possible number of such partners.

But even if the CDF signal at 140 GeV turns out to be a fluke, the new restrictions at higher masses will guide theorists in their work on the Higgs, asserts Roser. Physicists working on the CDF and DZero experiments discovered the new limits by independently sifting through more than 500 trillion collisions between protons and antiprotons generated since 2001 at the Tevatron. After searching for years, "We have finally crossed the threshold where every new piece of data allows us to explore new regions and brings us new knowledge" about the Higgs, says CDS cospokesman Giovanni Punzi of the University of Pisa and the National Institute of Nuclear Physics in Italy. "We are really at the point of starting to find the answer."

Physicists should be able to explore the full range of masses that the Higgs could still have using data expected to be acquired by CDF and DZero through the end of 2011, when the Tevatron is currently scheduled to shut down, Roser says. If the entire mass range is eventually ruled out, physicists will have to look for another explanation — a new type of force and particle — to explain how some subatomic particles got mass, Punzi notes.

The findings also heat up a David versus Goliath race to find the Higgs between the relatively small Tevatron facility and CERN’s powerful Large Hadron Collider near Geneva. The LHC now operates at 3.5 times the energy of the Tevatron and will ultimately double that amount. However, electrical problems have delayed operations at the LHC, and it hasn't acquired nearly as much data as initially hoped. Moreover, the LHC will shut down for upgrades in 2011 after running at only half its maximum energy. The LHC is not expected to operate at full capacity until 2013, which has prompted Tevatron scientists to request that the Illinois accelerator continue to run for three additional years, until 2014.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

R. Cowen. Elusive Higgs particle has fewer hideouts. Science News Online, March 16, 2009.
[Go to]

L. Sanders. LHC revs up. Science News. Vol. 177, April 24, 2010, p. 10. Available online:
[Go to]

Slides from Abid Padwa’s presentation at the 2010 International Conference on High Energy Physics in Paris:
[Go to]

Abstract of Ben Kilminster’s presentation at ICHEP:
[Go to]

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Somehow, my gut-feel says that all this talk of Higgs Boson even in theory is, a bit of a Hog-wash and at best a zero-order approximation to the real stuff involving some Quantum Gravity effects. Logic/History to back my gut feel goes as follows:

    1. Anything to do with mass and not factoring Gravitational Physics, seems at best a wishful attempt to stretch the rubber-band of current methods of QFT and Gauge Field Theories in flat space-time, a bit too far.

    2. Another eerie feeling I have is that an unexpected/null result on the Higgs Boson at LHC etc. (like the famous Michelson-Morley Exp over a century ago) will force a major overhaul of the approach and a radical theory for attacking the problems at the frontiers of Theoretical Physics today. Recall how radical Einstein's relativity was in its time... "A leap of faith: Time dilation", but elegantly simple... just hold the velocity of light constant and everything fell in place... NO ETHER, NO artificial Lorentz-Fitzgerald contractions... no special rules for electrodynamics and a different set for mechanics....

    3. HIGG's field smacks of some kind of a modern-day ether theory artificially built in the realm of QFT for electro-weak interactions (Weinberg-Salam Theory). The mass is supposed to be acquired by all other particles as they "couple" with this all-pervasive "Higgs Field" and the "mass" as we know it is actually "resistance" encountered by all these particles in coupling to this "God-Forsaken" Higgs Field, whose corresponding "Field Particle- Higgs Boson" we are supposed to observe....!!! This smacks of a preferred rest-frame for the Higgs Field.... Recall that the “19th century ether” was motivated by the then “mechanical” flavour of the day applied to explaining EM wave-propagation etc. , and similarly the “flavour” of our times are quantized fields, corresponding particles, coupling constants etc. Higgs Field and its Boson as model for source of mass/inertia of all particles, is just history repeating itself when we are again trying to overstretch our current mathematical methods, existing Physical trends and prevalent intuition to attack a problem which obviously involves gravitational physics in some basic form to start with at least, considering that “mass” is involved. The correct theory of mass-generation will also give an insight into the how & why of the “Principle of Equivalence” and “matter- antimatter” asymmetry in our universe.

    4. Whatever the new radical theory in a couple of decades time, string-theorists will always claim that some version of their highly tweak-able / mouldable bag of theories actually corresponds or gives similar results... just like Hoyle-Narlikar & Co tried for 3 to 4 decades to artificially re-create every Big-Bang+GR effect in their Steady State theory. The artificial Brans-Dickie Theory as an alternative to GR is also a similar example. Lots of recreating GR results, but no new predictions.

    Let’s keep our fingers crossed...

    Cheers,
    Mohit Sinha (mohit.sinha@geovas.com),
    Bangalore, INDIA
    Mohit Sinha Mohit Sinha
    Jul. 26, 2010 at 2:53pm
  • Take a centimeter cubed. Slice it so thin that each slice is on the quantum level. There would be an infinite number of slices. Let each slice connect to the last. Expand and curve this surface. Let us look at this as a cube changes to a sphere and the slices are the surface of the sphere. Raise the dimension by one. We have a hypersphere (4D), where the surface would be a 3D sphere that expands to infinity and beyond. The electron jumps from one level to the other, through the 4th dimension without moving in our 3 dimensions. All mass particles are trapped between the very thin 4th dimension slices, but mass-less particles are not. This is why some of the trace lines in the colliders appear and disappear; they travel in the 4th dimension. Also this is why the mass-less particles do not interact much with the mass in our universe. If you do not see this or want to tell me why this is not true, email me at scheff.2@osu.edu.
    Robert Scheff Robert Scheff
    Jul. 26, 2010 at 9:05pm
  • Every time reality gets in the way, they invent a new particle.
    When the experiment failed, they flailed.
    One chuckle bucket reckoned a future test ruined this test because it went back in time.
    ffs give us a break! The Earth has moved in its orbit since so how could it determine to hit the same location twice?

    The graviton was my favourite. Calculated to be as large as a hydrogen atom. I wrote to these people offering to sell them a sample of bottled graviton if they were serious.

    Are these people really intelligent?

    Einsteins E=mc2, E=Aether. Stolen off an Italian inventor who's idea was turned down when 'stein was working in the patent office. his famous light bending experiment was calculated by his mathematician tutor friend.

    Robert, the fourth dimension is mooted to be time. Not scale.

    Disappearing traces. Fascinating. If we make a list of guesses, it will be very long. Many of course will be in cloud cuckoo land.
    Andy Jones Andy Jones
    Jul. 29, 2010 at 9:55pm
  • Higgs Field-Particle YOK


    A. Fermilab homes in on Higgs mass
    Higgs likely lighter, and more elusive
    physicsworld.com

    B. According to the standard model,

    which describes all the forces in nature except gravity, all elementary particles were born massless. Interactions with the proposed Higgs field would slow down some of the particles and endow them with mass. Finding the Higgs — or proving it does not exist — has become one of the most important quests in particle physics.

    If the Higgs exists, it might decay into muons, into electrons paired with neutrinos or into jets of quarks. other elementary particles decay into these same particles.


    C. By commonsense, the best scientific approach, Higgs Field-Particle YOK

    Galaxy clusters move and accelerate Newtonianly because they evolved at the start of inflation from the mass just resolved from energy per E=Total[m(1 + D)]. They evolved by dispersion of the resolved mass into particles that became galaxy clusters, their dispersion fueled by mass that is reconverting to energy. At singularity, at D=0 (D=total spatial dispersion distance), all cosmic energy was in mass format. The start of inflation was the start of mass-to-energy reconversion, the start of gravity and of the clusters' acceleration per Newton's second law.

    Atoms are made of protons and neutrons, together called hadrons, along with lighter electrons. In turn, hadrons consist of quarks, of which there are six varieties. In addition, there are six varieties of fundamental particles related to the electron, called leptons.

    The standard model tenet that all elementary particles were born massless is, by common sense, rational for the pre-singularity universe, since just prior to inflation, to genesis of the present universe, all cosmic energy was in mass format. Rationally to the present post inflation universe all particles were born with mass.

    Rationally, and in agreement with the concept of singularity, with experience that the extent of mass gained is proportional to the extent of material energetically impansioned, the extent of born mass particles and of their stability are proportional to the attained extent of D.


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)

    The Universe According To Planck
    the-scientist.com
    03.2010 Updated Life Manifest
    the-scientist.com
    Cosmic Evolution Simplified
    the-scientist.com
    Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos
    the-scientist.com
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Aug. 1, 2010 at 10:07am
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us