- :: Atom & Cosmos
- :: Body & Brain
- :: Earth
- :: Environment
- :: Genes & Cells
- :: Humans
- :: Life
- :: Matter & Energy
- :: Molecules
- :: Science & Society
- :: Other Topics
- :: Science News For Kids
The findings, reported online July 28 at arXiv.org by Joshua Simon of the Carnegie Observatories in Pasadena, Calif., along with Marla Geha of Yale University and their colleagues, provide a bonanza for astronomers trying to unveil the nature of dark matter.
When astronomers discovered the galaxy Segue 1 in 2007, they weren’t sure if it was anything more than a cluster of stars, perhaps stripped from the nearby Sagittarius dwarf galaxy. But observations with the Keck II telescope atop Hawaii’s Mauna Kea now confirm the status of Segue 1 as a galaxy by showing that its stars have a diverse chemical composition, Simon says.
Observations by the Anglo-Australian Telescope near Coonabarabran, Australia, have also found a diversity of stellar composition in Segue 1, a team including Rosemary Wyse of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md., report in an article scheduled to be posted at arXiv.org in early August.
After examining the stars’ compositions, Simon’s team calculated the total amount of mass in Segue 1 — both the unseen dark matter and the small number of faint, visible stars — by measuring how fast the stars move. The faster the stars orbit about the center of Segue 1, the heavier the galaxy.
The team found that although the stars in Segue 1 have a combined mass of no more than about 1,000 suns, the mass of the whole galaxy is about 500 times larger. “That tells us that Segue 1 is made almost entirely of dark matter,” Simon says.
Segue 1 is both dark matter–dominated and compact, yielding a dark matter density higher than any known galaxy. The galaxy’s high density and proximity to Earth — about 80,000 light-years distant — make it an ideal place to look for proposed signatures of dark matter.
“It’s extremely important to figure out the dark matter properties of galaxies,” says Wyse. Galaxies such as Segue 1, which have such a tiny amount of visible material to gravitationally disturb the dark matter, are the best places to reveal the true distribution and nature of the unseen material.
In addition, Wyse says, the primitive chemical composition of several of the stars in Segue 1 may shed light on the formation and evolution of some of the oldest stars in the universe.
Just as particles of matter and antimatter can annihilate each other upon contact to produce large numbers of gamma rays, so may particles of dark matter annihilate one another, depending on exactly what the unseen material is made of. The higher the density of dark matter, the higher the rate of these annihilations, theory suggests.
The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, as well as ground-based telescopes that record energetic radiation that could be due to annihilation, should therefore make the galaxy a prime target, says Simon. “A detection of dark matter annihilation would be a breakthrough for both astronomy and particle physics, and the first step is figuring out where to look for it,” he says.
Found in: Atom & Cosmos

-
R. Cowen. From dark matter to light: New models of galaxy formation show the gastro in physics. Science News. Vol. 173, May 22, 2008, p. 186. Available to subscribers:
[Go to] - R. Cowen. Gammas from heaven: Physicists and astronomers join forces to study the high-energy universe. Science News. Vol. 172, November 3, 2007, p. 283. Available to subscribers:
[Go to] - R. Cowen. Experiment detects particles of dark matter, maybe. Science News, Vol. 177, January 2, 2010, p. 8. Available online:
[Go to]
-
J. Simon et al. A complete spectroscopic survey of the Milky Way satellite Segue 1: The darkest galaxy. Posted online July 27, 2010.
[Go to] - E. Rouven et al. Indirect dark matter detection limits from the ultra-faint Milky Way satellite Segue 1. Posted online July 27, 2010.
[Go to]
- Changing one of nature's constants
- Light-harvesting complexes do it themselves
- DVDs don’t turn toddlers into vocabulary Einsteins
- String theory entangled
- Microbe’s survival manual



- A Basic Physics Tenet
- The Universe In Which We Live
A. Neutrino quick-change artist caught in the act
A transformation from one ‘flavor’ to another confirms the elusive elementary particles have mass and suggests a need for new physics.
sciencenews.org
B. Adopt
- Each and every particle has mass.
- Dark energy and matter YOK.
- Higgs field/particle YOK.
- Do not be afraid of embarrassingly obvious answers. Adopt space-distance in lieu of space-time.
C. And Rethink The Universe
By the presently available data our universe is a dual-cycle array.
One cycle, the present, started from singularity, with all cosmic energy in mass format, and it has been proceeding to reconvert all the mass resolved at the big bang back to energy, by expanding the cosmos, by accelerating away the galaxy clusters.
The other cycle, the cycle that led to singularity, will re-start when the expanding cosmos consumes most or all mass that fuels the expansion. Gravity will then initiate reconversion of all the energy back to mass, to singularity, again.
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
Cosmic Evolution Simplified
the-scientist.com
Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos
the-scientist.com
EOTOE.Embarrassingly obvious expanding horizons beyond Darwin And Einstein.
molecularfossils.com
What theory? Based on what observations?
Anyone’s lying eyes can see that’s not the case.
The only evidence of fireworks revealed in colliding galaxies involves collisions of ordinary particles of baryonic matter. The ‘bullet cluster’ collision shows this clearly.
In such collisions Dark Matter clouds that appear to be responsible for providing galaxies with their superstructure, pass through each other with absolutely zero mutual interaction.
As for Dark Matter, if it’s really absolutely, completely invisible, and manifests itself purely through gravity, then it would be logical to conclude that it occupies the fourth spatial dimension.
I'm aware that few cosmologists want to consider such a possibility. Most of them would much rather waffle on about so called 'annihilations' based not simply on absolutely no evidence but on evidence that shows the opposite.
Please login or register to participate.