Web edition: August 13, 2010
Print edition: August 28, 2010; Vol.178 #5 (p. 28)
In 2008, science and technology writer Nicholas Carr asked in The Atlantic if Google is “making us stupid.” His latest book is an effort to answer that question and, more broadly, to explore how the tools of the Internet age are altering the way people find and use information.
Carr spends much of the book exploring how technology has shaped human habits of information consumption. Written language, for instance, made the poet-historian’s memory less crucial. With Gutenberg’s printing press, reading became widespread and the human brain, ever plastic, adapted to new demands. Now, the shift to online information is causing further neural changes but, Carr argues, mostly to ill effect.
Carr maintains that the Internet encourages distraction and superficiality. The sheer volume of information overwhelms anyone’s ability to absorb it. So instead of becoming absorbed, users browse from link to link to Twitter feed, gaining a broad but shallow appreciation of the available information. Carr cites psychology and neuroscience experiments to illustrate how vulnerable the human brain is to distraction and how such inattention can reduce comprehension and memory.
While Carr’s social history of an information revolution is solid, his concerns about how the Internet may alter neural mechanics are based on data that are still sparse. His take on the problems of the plugged-in brain is sure to spur debate, though — both online and off.
W.W. Norton & Co., 2010, 276 p., $26.95.
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
Or is the reason this "review" by Rachel Zelkowitz is as short and "superficial" as it is because of what the author, Nicholas Carr, writes about?
Brevity is a fine thing. But it is also subject to the drawbacks of excess...meaning that it's implementation (on the net and elsewhere in this all-consumming commercial culture) may indeed produce the results which Carr might be writing about.
But who would know? Certainly not from a 233-word review, of which a mere 28 specifically address any potential problem in Carr's treatise, as far as the reader of this review is invited to judge, on the strength that the mechanics the author relies on are "based on data that are still sparse".
The level of irony on this one leaves one blinking in amazement.
I don't need a superficial review of a book on the subject of superficiality in the net or the commercial marketplace which supports the vast majority of sites to convince me of what I've already regarded for over five decades to be blindingly obvious. In that respect, this review does little more than mention the existence of a book I might buy, basically, because 'it's there'.
Thanks for pointing it out, but I'll pass.
If SN is going to bother "reviewing" a book, it would be nice to see more than a few hundred words devoted to one that actually merits a mention in the first place. Even Carr might then rest assured I might actually bother to pay attention and even buy the book.
=============== h t t p : / / w w w . p o p b u y n o w . c o m
==============
Hello, summer, good place for shopping, fashion, sexy, personality, maturity, from here to begin. Are you ready?
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35 Tshirts (ed hardy,lacoste) $16 Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30 Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16 New era cap $15 Bikini (Ed hardy) $25 ============== h t t p : / / w w w . p o p b u y n o w . c o m
===============
Thank you both for pointing that out to us. Pretty sure I would have missed it otherwise.
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.