Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Seeing red: Next installment in BPA-paper saga
Telltale red flecks will mark North American thermal-receipt paper that is BPA-free
A+ A- Text Size

Telltale red flecks will mark North American thermal-receipt paper that is BPA-free

By Janet Raloff

Web edition: November 8, 2010

Enlarge
Signaling BPA's absence
Subtle red flecks — tiny rayon fibers — will soon identify the only BPA-free thermal-printed store receipts in North America.
Appleton

A year ago, I began reporting that a Massachusetts chemist had for years been turning up bisphenol A — a hormone-mimicking chemical — lacing the heat-sensitive coatings on local cash-register receipts. This BPA was used as an integral part of the paper’s color-change chemistry. As additional research teams confirmed his data, consumers (including me) began to ask: How can we identify which thermal papers include BPA? But there had been no means to distinguish between them. Until now.

Wisconsin-based Appleton Paper produces more than half of the thermal receipt paper sold in North America. In the first week in November, it began incorporating tiny biodegradable red rayon fibers in its stock. Resembling tiny eyelashes, they’re visible only on the paper’s back, uncoated side.

Explains Kent Willetts, the firm’s vice president of strategic development, since Appleton is the only company to make — or sell — BPA-free thermal-receipt paper in North America, these fibers offer consumers a way to identify at a glance which papers won’t shed BPA onto our hands and clothes.

His company eliminated BPA from its thermal-receipts paper four years ago when a blizzard of toxicology studies began pointing to potential health threats posed by the chemical.

The marking system took three months to develop and a substantial investment, he notes. “But it’s the right thing to do.”

Because thermal coatings that rely on BPA are such a rich and ubiquitous source of the chemical, several research teams have concluded cash-register and ATM receipts likely constitute the leading source of exposure for most Americans. And a new French government study has just confirmed what most of us didn’t want to hear: that BPA’s tiny molecules easily pass through skin, where they can enter the bloodstream.

The French data appear to also explain why a new survey of pregnant U.S. women found cashiers had the highest amounts of BPA in their bodies (as evidenced by the concentrations excreted in their urine).

Although production of the marked paper is underway, it’s going to take a while to filter into stores, Willetts says. “But you should start seeing it before the end of the year,” he says. Even then, the roll-out will be somewhat gradual. First to carry those red threads, he says, will be “about three-quarters of our thermal receipt paper by volume — our ‘bread-and-butter’ kind, used in everyday gas-pump and grocery-store types of receipts.” By the end of March, the rest should carry it as well, including higher grade papers used for ATM machines.

What won’t: the really high-grade thermal papers used for packing and shippers’ labels. They have to be able to withstand substantial abuse — including scuffing, blistering temperatures during transit and perhaps even sitting out in the rain. So even the paper's of Appleton's competitors have always used a different, more expensive color-change chemistry for this paper that doesn’t rely on BPA, Willetts notes.

For those lower grade applications, Appleton now uses a chemical cousin of BPA — BPS, aka diphenyl sulfone. EPA's public-private Design for the Environment partnership is assessing whether there’s an even safer substitute. “We welcome them in evaluating alternatives,” Willetts says, and will switch to one of them if data show “it’s better.”

To date, research has not indicted receipt paper — or the quantities of BPA that rub off from it — for triggering adverse health effects. However, a flurry of studies has been pointing to warning signs. For people who subscribe to the precautionary principle and would therefore gain peace of mind from avoiding unnecessary exposure, Americans will soon have a means of identifying a substantial source.

See also: Skin is no barrier to BPA, study shows

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Can you provide some citations for the assertion that "several research teams have concluded cash-register and ATM receipts likely constitute the leading source of exposure for most Americans." While this appears to be the case for individuals with occupational exposure to receipts, the research I am aware of indicates that the dominant source of exposure for the general population is food.
    Bill Pease Bill Pease
    Nov. 8, 2010 at 3:15pm
  • since you can't post links here I would suggest following the links in the article, especially the links in the first sentence, and doing a little googling,
    Jeff N Jeff N
    Nov. 9, 2010 at 7:33am
  • In your earlier article you write:
    _______
    "I think it’s a scandal that you can have people touching thermal paper all day long,” since the concentration of BPA in its surface coating could approach 10 percent pure BPA.
    Frederick vom Saal of the University of Missouri in Columbia, who performed the BPA assays ... agrees with Grob.
    “I won’t touch receipts now,” vom Saal says.
    __________

    Question -- the hardware that handles the paper and prints the receipts -- is it likely full of BPA powder, that would carry over to the new non-BPA paper when it's introduced? Does the stuff vacuum out in ordinary cleaning, for example, or stick to surfaces? I noticed mention the USPS bought non-BPA paper but its receipts still tested positive; they suggested local office were using old stock, but contamination seems a possibility

    People can buy "receipt scanners" to scan paper into computer files -- does that hardware accumulate BPA?

    I'm old enough to remember when janitorial services bought big cardboard drums of purple sawdust that janitors would sprinkle on the floor in front of their brooms, to help pick up dust. That was how the sawmills got rid of high-PCB waste, I was told at the time -- 1950s. Never have been able to verify that.

    It makes me wonder -- what would be done with BPA if it weren't being sold? Isn't it a fairly large volume byproduct of other chemical processes?

    Also recommended: ourstolenfuture.org/myths/vomsaal.htm

    "UPDATE: In May 2000 at a scientific meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark, Ashby reversed his long-standing position on vom Saal's work and stated: "I would like to place on record that I am in no doubt about the results that Fred vom Saal had found." [pS 300, Andersson et al. 2001.]

    Further update: In March 2003, Welshons et al. published an analysis suggesting that the two main industry attempts to replicate vom Saal's work failed because their control animals were inadvertently estrogenized by a contaminant, and thus unable to respond normally to bisphenol A.

    vom Saal's work ups the ante dramatically: his research focuses on the effects at very low doses of compounds that currently are big sources of income for a number of companies."
    hank hank
    Nov. 10, 2010 at 4:22pm
  • elcome to oue website________ b2cshop.us ==== accept credit card

    and so mang payment
    www b2cshop.us
    jordan air max oakland raiders $34--39;
    Ed Hardy AF JUICY POLO Bikini $25;
    Christan Audigier BIKINI JACKET $25;
    gstar coogi evisu true je ans $35;
    coach chanel gucci LV handbags $36;
    coogi DG edhardy gucci t-shirts $18;
    CA edhardy vests.paul smith shoes $32;
    jordan dunk af1 max gucci shoes $37;
    EDhardy gucci ny New Era cap $16;
    coach okely Adidas CHANEL DG Sunglass $18;
    _________ b2cshop.us
    hcfgcfgc fcfcfgcf hcfgcfgc fcfcfgcf
    Nov. 20, 2010 at 9:05pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us