Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Three scientists, three wishes (with extras for the cosmologist)
Research luminaries reveal the questions they'd most like to see answered
A+ A- Text Size

Research luminaries reveal the questions they'd most like to see answered

By Tom Siegfried

Web edition: November 8, 2010


When a cosmologist, a climatologist and a systems biologist walk into a bar and the bartender asks what they want, they don’t answer with drinks. They want discoveries.

Three such scientists walked into a hotel ballroom full of science writers November 8 and articulated more specifically just which discoveries they’d really like to see.

One “modest” wish came from Ralph Cicerone, the president of the National Academy of Sciences and a leading researcher in climate science. He would like to see a discovery about the dynamics of the world’s big ice formations: “What are the triggering events that will lead to big fractures and things sliding down into the ocean to make sea level rise, not just slow melting.”

Leroy Hood, president of the Institute for Systems Biology in Seattle, expressed a more ambitious desire: a discovery that would enable biologists to combine the digital information stored in DNA with information about environmental influences to predict the properties of the resulting human body.

“I think we will gain the knowledge that will let us be able to do those environmental plus digital transforms,” Hood said in New Haven, Conn., at a symposium organized by the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing. “Once we have that in place, we can go anywhere in health care and medicine that we want.”

And then there was the cosmologist, Michael Turner of the University of Chicago and director of the Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics there. His first wish: The discovery of the identity of the dark matter that lurks unseen throughout the cosmos, but is necessary to explain the way galaxies spin and flow through space.

 “I think we’re very close … to solving this dark matter problem and I think that’s going to be stunning when it sinks in that most of the stuff in the universe is made of something other than what we are,” Turner said.
 
Wish two: The discovery of the nature of dark energy, the mysterious entity causing the universe to expand at an accelerating rate. Turner would be especially happy if that discovery revealed that the dark energy is something other than simply the vacuum energy that ought to naturally occur in empty space.

“If we find out it’s something weirder than the energy of nothing, I think that doesn’t solve the problem, but it’s a gift to my younger colleagues, because science is all about big questions, and they need clues.”

Perhaps biggest of all is the question about whether the universe originated the way most cosmologists think it did, with a Big Bang explosion followed shortly thereafter by a quick burst of expansion known as inflation. Smoking gun evidence for inflation would come with Turner’s third wish: discovery of B mode polarization in the cosmic microwave background (obviously, but if you must know why, it’s because the B modes are signs of gravity waves from the inflationary era that would establish not only that inflation happened, but when it happened).

Of course, establishing inflation would also make it very likely that the universe inhabited by humans isn’t the only universe out there. If inflation happened once, it could happen an infinite number of times, creating more universes throughout the cosmos than rerun Law & Order episodes on cable.

Confirming inflation, by the way, would cause Turner to beg for a fourth wish: some way to get rid of all those extra universes.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (10)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • It is possible to answer at lease two of director Turner’s four wishes. Dark matter is based on the discovery, by Vera Rubin, that the outer fringes of galaxies spin much faster than expected. Gravitationally speaking, this leads to the assumption of extra unseen mass, to account for this phenomenon. Electro-dynamically speaking, two swirling, interacting, misaligned, fields of dark energy would produce the same effects. There is no dark matter. The spinning and swirling on and of large scale structure is caused by dark energy. For a full explanation, Google - helium, how the universe formed.
    ROBERT VANDERHOEK ROBERT VANDERHOEK
    Nov. 9, 2010 at 3:35pm
  • I believe the discovery will be that dark matter and dark energy are mental constructs to help legitimize Big Bang and keep old theorists in their university chairs.

    Dark matter is exactly that. Two gas bubbles the size of the Large Magellanic Cloud have just been discovered streaming perpendicular to the Milky Way central bulge. Only the portion of the bubble ionized by gamma rays is visible. The entire Milky Way is blanketed by gas tens of thousands of light years in diameter. We just aren't looking for it because it violates Big Bang. There is your missing mass.
    AmericanGypsie AmericanGypsie
    Nov. 11, 2010 at 4:35am
  • ASIMOV SAID ANYTHING COULD HAPPEN ONCE I THINK THE EMOTIONAL APPEAL TO INFINITY OF TIMES IS WRONG LOGICALLY IF YOU HAVENT PROVED IT ONCE SO QUICKLY IT IS NOT THE CASE THAT IT IS SO OFTEN A MATERIAL HAPPENING. TIME TAKEN O TURN UP A HIGGS BOSON FOR EXAMPLE IS NOT FAD EVEN IF IT IS FOUND ITS TOO SPARSE MAN THATS A LOGIC THEORY LATENT TO PONDER./ KUDOS
    grafspey grafspey
    Nov. 12, 2010 at 4:04pm
  • DEAR RALPH CICERONE ITS JUST A BIG NUMBER CALLED A GARFT YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT YET G P OF RUSSIA HAS GONE FOR GOOD AFTER ALL AND YOU MIGHT BE RIGHT TO DIRECT A MILLION FOR YOUR ANSWER EVENTUALLY MAN./KUDOS
    grafspey grafspey
    Nov. 12, 2010 at 4:22pm
  • Dark energy might or might not exist but I have believed for decades that we are surrounded by other universes, and they are pulling on our universe, thus we are expanding towards them. When our masses meet, mix, and condense, there will be big bangs going on all over, at different times and places. Just as it has been forever before, and now will for eternity. Usually the simplest explanation is the right one. As for dark matter, if there is suppose to be so much of it out there, why can't we grab some of it?
    Harrrie Harrrie
    Nov. 14, 2010 at 10:31am
  • On Two Scientists Wishes

    Three scientists, three wishes (with extras for the cosmologist)
    Research luminaries reveal the questions they'd most like to see answered.
    sciencenews.org

    - Climatology is, for me, an unopened book. Hence no comment.

    However, re:

    - Systems Biology,

    "A discovery that would enable biologists to combine the digital information stored in DNA with information about environmental influences to predict the properties of the resulting human body"
    is a most ambitious wish. Since DNA (and some RNA) genetic templates were evolved, produced, are maintained and employed by RNAs, Earth's primal organisms, to carry out all life's processes, this is a wish to outdo RNA. It is a wish to better RNA, not just to be able to predict RNA's reaction to specific environmental states but to also predict evolution of environments...

    - Cosmology

    I, "The discovery of the identity of the dark matter that lurks unseen throughout the cosmos, but is necessary to explain the way galaxies spin and flow through space."

    II, " The discovery of the nature of dark energy, the mysterious entity causing the universe to expand at an accelerating rate."

    Sad, sad, sad news. Dark energy and dark matter YOK! All the energy and mass of the universe are accounted for in the concept of "space distance" in lieu of/in addition to "space time".


    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    the-scientist.com profile

    Seed of Human-Chimp Genomes Diversity
    pulse.yahoo.com
    03.2010 Updated Life Manifest
    the-scientist.com
    Cosmic Evolution Simplified
    the-scientist.com
    Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos
    the-scientist.com
    Evolution, Natural Selection, Derive From Cosmic Expansion
    darwiniana.com
    Dov Henis Dov Henis
    Nov. 15, 2010 at 11:40am
  • To define "another universe" requires a boundary to this one. How far away is that boundary? Galaxy A is 13 billion light years beyond Polaris. Galaxy B `2 Glys beyond the Southern Cross. At noon today both A and B received light which was emitted by the Milky Way 13 Gyrs ago (extremely red shifted). At noon today A also received light from Galaxy C 13 Glys from thr opposite direction;and B received light from D (C,A,MW,B,D are on a straight 52-Gly long stretch of line) How far away are the ends of that line where another universe begins? Is there a galaxy closer to another universe than we are?
    John Moes John Moes
    Nov. 15, 2010 at 4:08pm
  • A small positive value of the cosmological constant (the source of dark energy) can be explained by noting that virtual particles can have positive or negative energy. The number of positive-energy virtual particles created spontaneously in the vacuum exceeds the number of negative-energy virtual particles by just the right amount to account for the observed value of the cosmological constant. Virtual particles of negative energy are also needed to explain how exchange forces can be attractive. Forces due to the exchange of positive-energy virtual bosons are repulsive because the momentum of a positive-energy particle is parallel to its direction of motion. However, the momentum of a negative-energy virtual particle is antiparallel to its direction of motion, so an exchange of negative-energy virtual bosons causes an attractive force between the objects exchanging the bosons. A critical question then is why nature should favor the spontaneous creation of positive-energy virtual particles over the spontaneous creation of negative-energy virtual particles in the vacuum. How can quantum field theory explain such asymmetry in the creation of virtual particles?
    Kenneth Epstein Kenneth Epstein
    Nov. 17, 2010 at 10:49am
  • Dark matter has one deeply political explanation in the demand from Africans and some other dark-skinned people for more influence from above. Being white means that one is always willing to ascribe the favorable influence from above to light. I have not known how to resolve this difference since meeting the suggestion from some African-American and African-Jamaican friends. Roughly speaking, their question is "Where's our gravity?!"
    Michael Lewis Michael Lewis
    Dec. 9, 2010 at 1:32am
  • Would there be any way to tell if the the dark matter gravitational affects were actually bleeding into our universe from another one very close to it in brane-space?

    I'm not suggesting it is, I'm just wondering if we could tell the difference.

    Lowell Boggs Lowell Boggs
    Jan. 22, 2011 at 10:51pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us