Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Letters
A+ A- Text Size

By Science News Staff

Web edition: January 14, 2011
Print edition: January 29, 2011; Vol.179 #3 (p. 31)

Prescient Editor in Chief?
I got behind on magazine reading over the summer; now that colder weather is here I’m catching up, randomly. I read the Nov. 6 issue one day, with the Life article on microbes that walk on their pili (“Sure, but can they chew gum too?” SN: 11/6/10, p. 8); the next day I opened up the Sept. 26, 2009 issue. There right up front was Tom Siegfried’s “From the Editor” note where he says, “Picture ... a bacterium with legs that lived on a cosmic-sized sheet of paper.” Did he have advance knowledge, was it a pie-in-the-sky, never-gonna-happen wild guess, or is he a wise foreteller of the future?
Gerry Beard, Edgewood, N.M.

This is an enduring mystery to all of us here at Science News. —Eva Emerson

Over time, it gets complicated
After reading “Getting to know you less and less” (SN: 11/6/10, p. 16), I felt the researchers’ assumptions were incomplete. So I asked my wife of 42 years what her favorite color was. Her response was just as I expected: “I don’t have a favorite color,” she said, “only a range of colors.” This was true for me also. Thus, I think that one factor is not that couples get to know each other less the longer they’ve been together, it is that over the years they experience more and more things, and their likes and dislikes are more complicated than when they were young. Each partner then is less likely to know what the other likes because the other has no simple answer.
O. Frank Turner, Pueblo West, Colo.

Sticky and all lit up
In response to “Electrons tell a tale of the tape” (SN: 11/6/10, p. 13), some adhesive tape can also radiate visible light, and it doesn’t need a vacuum to do it. If you remove the gummed wrapper from a Breathe Right nasal strip in the dark, it will create a dramatic flash of light. Is this the same phenomenon at work? If so, this might be an easier example to study.
David Taylor, Half Moon Bay, Calif.

Scotch tape emits visible blue light when adhesive bonds between the sticky side and the smooth side are broken. Biting into certain Life Savers mints also creates a burst of visible light. But the light you see from cracking into a mint or tearing off some kinds of tape comes from breaking chemical bonds in the material. This is different from what the new research found: Unexpectedly, peeling tape also emits X-rays, a much higher-energy type of radiation. Electric charge is separated when the tape peels, producing an electric field that accelerates free electrons to produce X-rays. — Marissa Cevallos
Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

Comments (1)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Reading the article "Swift action to cut greenhouse emissions could save polar bears" SN 1/15/2011, I have a few 'inconvenient truth' questions:
    "Many researchers think that end-summer Arctic ice could be almost entirely gone by the middle of this century." How many? Who? 7% of the U.S. population (about 21 Million)thinks Elvis is still alive.. Do I believe them? Nope.
    Are these 'many researchers' people whose continuing grant money depends on finding man-made global warming? Far more likely.

    "in the Nature paper...using a widely accepted climate model.." What model, accepted by whom? This wouldn't the the same models and folks that cooked the books in Climategate, would it? Models are only as good as their input... I can show global cooling by adjusting just a couple of the disputed parameters. GIGO. (Garbage In, Garbage Out)

    This is the second article in the last couple months that present man-made global warming as fact. It IS NOT.

    If this magazine is going to become a hack rag for global warming proponents, I WILL end my subscription and financial support. Show some editorial backbone and objectivity, guys.

    By the way, I've been a subscriber for nearly 40 years. This is the first time I've written about your lack of objectivity. If I think you've recently lost the "true faith" of objectivity, it means something. Got it?
    C Hall C Hall
    Jan. 18, 2011 at 1:43pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us