Quantcast
issue
Read articles, including Science News stories written for ages 9-14, on the SNK website.
Half of adult males carry HPV
Human papillomavirus lingers for months in men, study shows
A+ A- Text Size

Human papillomavirus lingers for months in men, study shows

By Nathan Seppa

Web edition: February 28, 2011
Print edition: March 26, 2011; Vol.179 #7 (p. 12)

The virus notorious for causing cervical cancer in women also turns up frequently in men and can hang on unnoticed for months or even years, researchers report online March 1 in Lancet. The study solidifies earlier research indicating that human papillomavirus is highly prevalent in men and strengthens the case for vaccinating men and boys against it, the report’s authors say.

There are dozens of types of HPV, including more than 40 that can be transmitted sexually. Some can cause cancer. Two vaccines, Merck’s Gardasil and GlaxoSmithKline’s Cervarix protect against two types of cancer-causing HPV. Both vaccines are approved and recommended for girls and young women. Gardasil is also recommended for boys up to age 18 since its protection extends to two additional types of HPV that cause genital warts in males and females.

It’s widely assumed that limiting the virus in men or women would diminish its spread in the whole population. But while HPV has been extensively studied in women, its prevalence is less well understood in men, says Joseph Monsonego of the Institute of the Cervix in Paris, writing in the same Lancet issue. For that reason, he says, the new study results “are of substantial interest.”

Starting in 2005, epidemiologist Anna Giuliano of the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute in Tampa, Fla., and an international team of researchers recruited more than 4,000 men living in Brazil, Mexico and Florida into a study of HPV. The new study reports on the first 1,159 of these volunteers. Their average age was 32 and none had been vaccinated against HPV. Swabs of the penis and genital area of each man revealed that 50 percent were infected with at least one HPV type upon enrollment.

The researchers repeated these exams every six months, and the men completed personal-history questionnaires. Over a median of 28 months, the group acquired 1,572 new HPV infections.

The human immune system can clear HPV out of the body, and the men wiped out most of their new infections during the study period. But it took a median 7.5 months. Median clearance times didn’t vary substantially among the countries, but did vary between HPV types. Some cases lingered as long as 24 months in the men.

HPV 16 is the type responsible for the most cervical cancers in women and is covered by both vaccines. It took a median of 12 months to clear. “It’s hanging around longer, and it’s completely asymptomatic,” Giuliano says. “You don’t even know you have it.” This silent infection means a person can transmit this HPV type for longer periods and “might help explain why HPV 16 is one of the most common types in both men and women,” she says.

The data also reveal that men who reported having 10 or more sexual partners in their lifetimes had roughly twice as many HPV infections as did men who had had one partner.

Giuliano says many insurance programs cover HPV vaccination in boys up to age 18.

Male circumcision and the use of condoms have shown little protection against HPV infection, Monsonego says. “HPV vaccination in men will protect not only them but will also have implications for their sexual partners,” he says.

Giuliano says she expects to have data on the full group in three years.

Comment
Print Friendly and PDF

A.R. Giuliano et al. Incidence and clearance of genital human papillomavirus infection in men (HIM): a cohort study. Lancet, online March 1, 2011.
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62342-2

J. Monsonego. Genital infection with HPV in men: research into practice. Lancet, online March 1, 2011.
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60277-8


A.R. Giuliano et al. efficacy of quadrivalent HPV vaccination against HPV infection and disease in males. New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 364, Feb. 3, 2011, p. 401.

N. Seppa. Nobel Prize in medicine given for HIV, HPV discoveries: Three Europeans recognized for linking viruses to AIDS, cervical cancer. Science News, Vol. 174, Oct. 25, 2008, p. 10.
[Go to]

N. Seppa. Vaccine Clears Major Hurdle: Injections offer new tool against cervical cancers. Science News, Vol. 168, Oct. 15, 2005, p. 243.
[Go to]

Comments (4)

Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.

  • Isn't it the case that HPV increases the risk of cancer in males too? Why is there no public health interest in that?
    Bruce Donald Bruce Donald
    Feb. 28, 2011 at 11:32pm
  • 'Half of adult males carry HPV'

    Studay data is derived from volunteers and not a random population sample. Therefore the headline is false.
    PR PR
    Mar. 2, 2011 at 3:17pm
  • HPV16 and other high-risk types are much lower in circumcised men, as shown by numerous studies, including a recent large randomized controlled trial. Condoms are partially effective. Thus Monsonego is wrong. While vaccination of all boys should be good in theory, it will be very expensive. Current vaccines target 2 of the 15 or so high-risk HPV types. A large randomized placebo-controlled trial of Gardisal by Garland et al. in New Engl J Med in 2005 showed it was only 20% effective in reducing cervical abnormalities over 3 years. It may at best have a similar effect on pre-cancerous abnormalities in men who have receptive anal sex. It will have little impact on penile cancer because only half of these are from HPV, phimosis (tight foreskin) being the biggest risk factor. Given that male circumcision was shown in Lancet in Jan in a large randomized controlled trial to reduce HPV infection in women by 28%, male circumcision seems more effective. When performed soon after birth it will also lower infant urinary tract infections, balanoposthitis, phimosis, various STIs besides HPV, including HIV, virtually eliminate penile cancer, improve hygiene and sexual function and sensitivity. Male circumcision is a more cost-effective option if one had to choose.
    Brian Morris Brian Morris
    Mar. 3, 2011 at 7:51pm
  • I myself was circumcised as a neonate, it was standard procedure at Atlanta hospitals then.

    Nowadays everything is politicized and parents fight to keep their children's prepuces intact on general principle.

    It's a bit baffling for me; these are the same people who object to vaccinations because of a supposed slightly increased risk of autism? Why not cash in on a huge drop in neonatal, childhood and adult pathology?
    John Turner John Turner
    Mar. 7, 2011 at 2:48pm
Registered readers are invited to post a comment. To encourage fruitful discussion, please keep your comments relevant, brief and courteous. Offensive, irrelevant, nonsensical and commercial posts will not be published. (All links will be removed from comments.)

You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.

Follow Us