Web edition: April 29, 2011
A leaked internal document, rumors flying on blogs, and scientists in thrall. Not exactly the stuff one usually associates with experiments in elementary particle physics. But all the rules and academic niceties get thrown out the window when it’s a potential sighting of the Higgs boson.
The Higgs is the missing piece in the highly successful standard model of particle physics. The particle — or more precisely the field that the particle is associated with — would endow particles with mass, and researchers have been hunting for it for decades. Physicists also believe the discovery of the Higgs will lead to transformative insights, including new, as yet unknown physical phenomena, notes Andrew Lankford, deputy spokesperson for the ATLAS experiment at the world’s most powerful atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva. Whichever team finds convincing evidence of the particle will undoubtedly win a Nobel prize.
So it’s little wonder that an unvetted, leaked abstract suggesting that the ATLAS experiment might actually have found signs of the Higgs would create a clamor once it got posted on the Internet. And that’s despite the fact that no one seems to know — or at least be willing to speak publicly about — the statistical significance of the potential finding.
The abstract, written by University of Wisconsin–Madison researchers who have not answered e-mails, says that the ATLAS experiment has found more pairs of photons at an energy of 115 billion electron-volts (GeV) than expected.
That’s intriguing because many scientists think the Higgs boson may have a mass between 110 and 130 GeV. (Thanks to the equivalence of mass and energy discovered by Einstein, physicists often express mass in terms of energy.) The Higgs readily decays into other particles, and on rare occasions it would decay into a pair of photons. However, the photon excess cited in the abstract is about 30 times larger than that expected for the Higgs, the researchers note.
“The merits of searching for the Higgs decay to two photons is that this signature is more easily identified experimentally than the decay to heavy particles,” notes Lankford, who is at the University of California, Irvine.
“However, the rareness of this decay mode, particularly for a standard model Higgs, suggests that we will need to collect much more data with the LHC before we would expect to observe this decay mode.”
In an informal poll of physicists gathered for an executive board meeting of the American Physical Society in Los Angeles, “the general impression is skepticism,” says theorist Katie Freese of the University of Michigan. She adds that the data are not consistent with the standard Higgs model, nor the simplest extensions of it. “ATLAS did not vet the data so it's really too soon to tell,” she says.
Adds Lankford: “Frankly, people should not be so excited when they don’t know the statistical significance. Statistically insignificant effects are statistically frequent, particularly when one is searching broadly for a variety of possible discoveries at a facility such as the LHC. Nonetheless ... there is a lot of pent up anticipation of the observation of the Higgs.”
Please alert Science News to any inappropriate posts by clicking the REPORT SPAM link within the post. Comments will be reviewed before posting.
Secret of mass
So what's the secret of mass?
Man has been studying mass since archimedes, so what is mass?
Science teaches mass is everything around us the mountains the oceans the air we breathe the trees in the forest the fish in the sea.
I would like to introduce you to a driffent way to look at mass.
Science has traditionally looked at mass as stuff all the things you can see and touch.
Science has been content calling it mass and stuff and they have gotten results with this method, They discovered the elements and made the element table.
They discovered molecules and they discovered the atom, and then science went quantum into the subatomic, the world of Lepton, Quarks and Bosons forces, what are they looking for you ask?
They are looking for the elusive gravity particle.
I believe the reason they can't find gravity is because of the way they look at mass.
Science has tried to unite gravity with T.O.E. The Theory Of Everything , The electromagnetic and the electronuclear strong and weak force, however they know this is not right either.
Their next hope is string theory and super string theory, which will be untestable for a long time to come, is this really where science wants to spend the next 100 years?
Where did science go wrong?
We are taught mass is everything we see, the stuff our world and universe is made of.
Scientists have said we are made of the same thing the universe is made of, Stardust.
Scientists treat mass as an inanimate object, a particle to be smashed at will, the problem is rutherford, newton or Einstein never answered the most important question regarding mass.
What is mass? Is mass an inanimate object? Why does this matter?
Q. What is mass, well let's look at the universe, suns, planets, earth, mountains, trees, man, dogs, cats, mice, ants and bacteria.
Q. What do they all have in common? Mass, Gravity and Atoms.
So if the atoms and gravity are the common denominator then the question becomes what is the atom?, Is it an inanimate object, let's see .
Oxford dictionary defines , Atomic structure as : Structure of an atom being positively charged nucleus surrounded by negatively "Orbiting" electrons.
Oxford dictionary defines , Life as : Energy, Liveliness , animation.
As you can see for your self the atom fits the definition for life and is an animate object!
So am I to conclude an atom is life? Yes to be exact an atom is the fundamental building block for all life in the universe and right here on earth!
There is no such thing as an inanimate object, all mass has life!
Atoms make up molecules, molecules make up elements and elements make up everything else everywhere else!
So if mass contains an atom it contains life.
So if all mass contains life , and all mass contains gravity , Then the rational conclusion is all life contains gravity.
So the origins of gravity is life.
The gravity disappears at the subatomic level, so where does it go?
It's not hiding in the subatomic particles as CERN and L.H.C. Large Hadron Collider has proven.
So where did gravity go?
It went in the same direction with life. So gravity is a manifestation of life. WOW!
Quote
An atom is life and endowed with gravity!
Ronald Alvarez
Government = Exxon+Shell+Mobile+Chevron.
See what I mean? it all becomes clear now doesn't it!! I know this because the Snicker bar told me. It also told me the toaster doesn't like the smell of my onion bagels. Really? Bite me toaster!!!
The website needs some moderation, and it needs it now!
Oh yeah, I forgot, I have handbags for sale at www-handbagsforsale-com and all the yo-yo's you could ever want right here at www-sciencenews-com.
Come on people, hire a moderator or just turn off comments!
Has an author *ever* responded to a comment? Or even read one?
You must register with Science News to add a comment. To log-in click here. To register as a new user, follow this link.