Scientists rule out natural chance in 2016 deadly heat, ocean warming events
Xinhua/Alamy Stock Photo
NEW ORLEANS — For the first time, scientists have definitively linked human-caused climate change to extreme weather events.
A handful of extreme events that occurred in 2016 — including a deadly heat wave that swept across Asia — simply could not have happened due to natural climate variability alone, three new studies find. The studies were part of a special issue of the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, also known as BAMS, released December 13.
These findings are a game changer — or should at least be a conversation changer, Jeff Rosenfeld, editor in chief of BAMS, said at a news conference that coincided with the studies’ release at the American Geophysical Union’s annual meeting. “We can no longer be shy about talking about the connection between human causes of climate change and weather,” he said.
For the last six years, BAMS has published a December issue containing research on extreme weather events from the previous year that seeks to disentangle the role of anthropogenic climate change from natural variability. The goal from the start has been to find ways to improve the science of such attribution, said Stephanie Herring of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Centers for Environmental Information in Boulder, Colo., who was lead editor of the latest issue.
To date, BAMS has published 137 attribution studies. But this is the first time that any study has found that a weather event was so extreme that it was outside the bounds of natural variability — let alone three such events, Herring said.
Story continues below map
In addition to the Asia heat wave, those events were the record global heat in 2016 and the growth and persistence of a large swath of high ocean temperatures, nicknamed “the Blob,” in the Bering Sea off the coast of Alaska. The unusually warm waters, which lingered for about a year and a half, have been linked to mass die-offs of birds, collapsed codfish populations in the Gulf of Alaska and altered weather patterns that brought drought to California.
Many of the other 24 studies in the new issue found a strong likelihood of human influence on extreme weather events, but stopped short of saying they were completely out of the realm of natural variability. One study found that an already strong El Niño in 2016 was probably enhanced by human influence, contributing to drought and famine conditions in southern Africa. Another reported that greenhouse gas–driven warming of sea surface temperatures in the Coral Sea was the main factor driving an increase in coral bleaching risk along the Great Barrier Reef. But not all of the studies linked 2016’s extreme events to human activity. Record-breaking rainfall in southeastern Australia between July and September, for example, was due to natural variability, one study found.
With hurricanes, wildfires and drought, 2017 is chock-full of extreme event candidates for next year’s crop of BAMS attribution studies. Already, the likelihood of human influence on the extreme rainfall from Hurricane Harvey is the subject of three independent studies, two of which were also presented at the American Geophysical Union meeting. The storm dropped about 1.3 meters of water on Houston and its surrounding areas in August. The three studies, discussed in a separate news conference December 13, found that human influence probably increased the hurricane’s total rainfall, by anywhere from at least 15 percent to at least 19 percent.
Story continues below image
“I think [the BAMS studies] speak to the profound nature of the impacts we’re now seeing,” says Michael Mann, a climate scientist at Penn State who was not involved in any of the studies. But Mann says he’s concerned that many researchers are too focused on quantifying how much human influence was responsible for a particular event, rather than how human influence affects various processes on the planet. One example, he notes, is the established link between rising temperatures and increased moisture in the atmosphere that is also implicated in Hurricane Harvey’s extreme rainfall.
Another possible issue with attribution science, he says, is that the current generation of simulations simply may not be capable of capturing some of the subtle changes in the climate and oceans — a particular danger when it comes to studies that find no link to human activities. It’s a point that climate scientist Andrew King of the University of Melbourne in Australia, who authored the paper on Australia’s rainfall, also noted at the news conference.
“When we find no clear signal for climate change, there might not have been a human influence on the event, or [it might be that] the particular factors of the event that were investigated were not influenced by climate change,” he said. “It’s also possible that the given tools we have today can’t find this climate change signal.”
Rosenfeld noted that people tend to talk about the long odds of an extreme weather event happening. But with studies now saying that climate change was a necessary condition for some extreme events, discussions about long odds no longer apply, he said. “These are new weather extremes made possible by a new climate.”
S.C. Herring et al, eds. Explaining extreme events from a climate perspective. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. December 2017.
K. Emanuel. How unusual were Hurricane Harvey’s rains? American Geophysical Union fall meeting, New Orleans, December 13, 2017.
M.F. Wehner, C.M. Patricola and M.D. Risser. Estimating the human influence on hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. American Geophysical Union fall meeting, New Orleans, December 12, 2017.
G. J. van Oldenborgh et al. Attribution of extreme rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017. American Geophysical Union fall meeting, New Orleans, December 12, 2017.
K. Emanuel. Assessing the present and future probability of Hurricane Harvey’s rainfall. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 114, November 28, 2017, p. 12681. doi:10.1073/pnas.1716222114.
G.J. van Oldenborgh et al. Attribution of extreme rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017. Environmental Research Letters. Published online December 13, 2017. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9ef2.
M.D. Risser and M.F. Wehner. Attributable human-induced changes in the likelihood and magnitude of the observed extreme precipitation during Hurricane Harvey. Geophysical Research Letters. Published online December 12, 2017. doi: 10.1002/2017GL075888.
C. Gramling. Humans are driving climate change, federal scientists say. Science News Online, November 3, 2017.
C. Gramling. Intense storms provide the first test of powerful new hurricane forecast tools. Science News Online, September 21, 2017.
E. Engelhaupt. Does doom and gloom convince anyone about climate change? Science News Online, July 28, 2017.
T. Sumner. For three years in a row, Earth breaks heat record. Science News. Vol. 191, February 18, 2017, p. 9.
T. Sumner. Glacier melting’s link to climate change confirmed. Science News. Vol. 191, January 21, 2017, p. 14.
M. E. Mann, E.A. Lloyd, and N. Oreskes. Assessing climate change impacts on extreme weather events: the case for an alternative (Bayesian) approach. Climatic Change. Vol. 144, p. 131. doi:10.1007/s10584-017-2048-3.