Context

Science past and present

Tom Siegfried

Context


Context

‘Gravity waves’ is an OK way to refer to gravitational radiation

gravitational waves illustrated

Scientists announced February 11 that they have detected the ripples in spacetime caused by a black hole merger, regardless of whether you call those ripples “gravitational waves” or “gravity waves.” 

Sponsor Message

It’s OK to call them “gravity waves.”

Purists insist that the spacetime ripples just discovered by the Advanced LIGO observatories should be called “gravitational” waves. Which in itself is just a shorthand way of saying radiation of gravitational energy via oscillations in the fabric of spacetime. Further shortening that to “gravity wave” is considered by some to be scientifically illiterate, because “gravity wave” is already taken by scientists who study fluid mechanics. In that context, “gravity wave” refers to disturbances in fluids that occur when two fluids meet or layers of different densities (such as in the atmosphere) come together.

For some people unfamiliar with the concept of homonyms, the use of “gravity wave” in fluid mechanics renders illicit its use to describe gravitational radiation. On the other hand, it’s a general rule of good writing to use no more syllables than necessary. Besides, there’s plenty of justification for using the “gravity” shorthand.

Merriam-Webster’s collegiate unabridged dictionaries recognize the astrophysical meaning of gravity wave, for instance. Physicists often use the phrase in casual conversation. And while “gravitational wave” is more common in the scientific literature, plenty of published papers use the shorter form. You can find it in papers published in Astrophysical Journal Letters, for instance, or Physical Review D, or even Physical Review Letters. And the late John Archibald Wheeler, America’s foremost expert on general relativity in the 20th century, once wrote a book with a whole chapter titled “Gravity Waves.”

So if you encounter anybody who chastises you for saying “gravity waves” because the phrase also has a meaning in fluid mechanics, tell them to spend eight minutes listening to Led Zeppelin’s “Stairway to Heaven.” ’Cause you know sometimes words have two meanings.

Follow me on Twitter at @tom_siegfried

Particle Physics,, Quantum Physics,, History of Science

Entanglement is spooky, but not action at a distance

By Tom Siegfried 7:05am, January 27, 2016
Recent experiments on quantum entanglement confirm that it’s spooky, but it was not, as Einstein implied, action at a distance.
Particle Physics,, Quantum Physics,, History of Science

Quantum spookiness survives its toughest tests

By Tom Siegfried 7:00am, January 27, 2016
Recent experiments on quantum entanglement confirm that it’s spooky, but it was not, as Einstein implied, action at a distance.
History of Science,, Numbers

Happy Birthday to Boole, with 11001000 binary candles

By Tom Siegfried 6:30am, October 30, 2015
George Boole’s 200th birthday is occasion to celebrate the 1s and 0s of computer language.
Science & Society,, Numbers

Unreliable science impairs its ability to serve society

By Tom Siegfried 5:53pm, October 28, 2015
Science’s reproducibility problem impairs the ability of basic research to inform the search for better medicinal drugs.
Quantum Physics,, Cosmology

Quantum interpretations feel the heat

By Tom Siegfried 8:00am, October 25, 2015
Landauer’s principle shows a way to test competing interpretations about quantum physics.
Particle Physics,, History of Science

Top 10 subatomic surprises

By Tom Siegfried 4:52pm, October 6, 2015
Nobel Prize–winning neutrinos rank among science’s most unexpected discoveries.
History of Science

The amateur who helped Einstein see the light

By Tom Siegfried 6:00am, October 1, 2015
With help from Science News Letter, eccentric amateur Rudi Mandl persuaded Einstein to explore the phenomenon of gravitational lensing.
Numbers,, Science & Society

Evidence-based medicine lacks solid supporting evidence

By Tom Siegfried 6:00am, September 14, 2015
Saving science from its statistical flaws will require radical revision in its methods
Numbers,, Science & Society

Top 10 ways to save science from its statistical self

By Tom Siegfried 9:00am, July 10, 2015
Saving science from its statistical flaws will require radical revision in its methods.
Numbers,, Science & Society

Science is heroic, with a tragic (statistical) flaw

By Tom Siegfried 11:29am, July 2, 2015
Science falls short of its own standards because of the mindless use of ritualistic statistical tests.
Subscribe to RSS - Context