Latest Issue of Science News

5/2/15 Cover

Scicurious

A peek behind the science curtain

Bethany Brookshire

Scicurious


Scicurious

For the blind, hearing the way forward can be a tradeoff

Enhanced localization abilities in one plane may come at the expense of another

person cupping ear

People who have been blind since childhood sometimes have better hearing than sighted people, but a new study finds that enhanced hearing in one direction may come at the expense of another.

Sponsor Message

There’s a common notion that people who have deficiencies in one sensory area must have enhancements in others: People with hearing loss have better sight, and people who are blind certainly must have better hearing. That idea even shows up in our superhero stories. Mild-mannered lawyer by day, vigilante by night, Marvel’s Daredevil cannot see. He was blinded as a child. But the same radioactive sludge that took his sight enhanced his other abilities. He now has superhuman hearing, touch, smell and even a vague sort of radar.

But real life isn’t quite like that.

“We have this idea that people without vision are necessarily better in all other senses,” says David Burr, a vision researcher at the University of Florence in Italy. “But it’s not necessarily the case.” Many blind people have better pitch perception than sighted people. They also have better sound localization for sounds on the periphery of a space, and parts of the visual cortex are recruited for auditory sound processing in people who are blind. A new study shows that some people who have been blind for most of their lives do have enhanced hearing. This hearing enhancement is a sensory tradeoff. But the tradeoff isn’t between sight and sound. Instead, it’s a tradeoff between two different hearing directions.

Study coauthor Patrice Voss, a cognitive neuroscientist at McGill University in Montreal, was especially interested in how people who have been blind since early in life might use spectral cues to find out where a sound is coming from.  When a sound is in the horizontal plane (in front of us, behind or to either side) we usually pinpoint it binaurally — our brains compare the difference in sound timing between our right and left ears. But when identifying sounds in the vertical plane (above or below us, in a straight line from the top of our heads), the sound travels an equal distance to each ear, so there aren’t right-left cues to give us location. Instead, we use spectral cues: Subtle differences in how our outer ears, or pinnae, shape the sound as it comes in. We also use these spectral cues when one of our ears is blocked, taking away our ability to use the binaural method to locate the source of a sound.

To compare how blind people navigate in the horizontal and vertical plane, Voss and his colleagues played sounds for sighted people and people who have been blind since childhood. The sounds came from either the front and sides (the horizontal plane) or the above and below (the vertical plane). For each sound, blindfolded volunteers had to aim a laser pointer toward where they thought the sound was coming from. They did this with both ears open and with one ear blocked.

The scientists quickly found that the blind participants fell into two groups. One group was better at locating sounds in the horizontal plane with one ear blocked — using spectral cues — while the other group was no better than sighted people at locating the source of the sound. When the blind subjects had to pinpoint sounds in the vertical plane, the group that performed normally in the horizontal plane continued to perform normally, just as sighted people did. But the group that had enhanced abilities when locating sounds side-to-side actually had deficits when locating sounds up and down.

So the improved use of spectral cues in the horizontal plane in some blind people may be a tradeoff for abilities in the vertical plane — not simply an enhancement that comes from being blind. Voss says that this is a logical tradeoff to make. “When a blind person navigates, most of the relevant sounds are in the horizontal plane [objects or people coming at you from the front, sides or behind],” he explains. “Not much relevant information coming from above. [Blind people] could learn to attach greater importance to signals from the horizontal plane and sacrifice the ability to localize on the vertical plane.” Voss and his colleagues published their findings April 15 in the Journal of Neuroscience.

How we use spectral cues isn’t innate, it’s something that we learn, notes Andrew King, an auditory neuroscientist at the University of Oxford. “If you have a hearing loss in one ear, the auditory system immediately starts boosting the auditory reliance on spectral cues,” he explains. King says this study emphasizes how plastic our auditory systems can be, enhancing detection in one plane at the sacrifice of another.

But he also notes that the culprit for sound localization might not be the spectral cues. Instead, it might be a phenomenon called head shadow. If one of your ears is plugged, any sound played will sound softer, as only the open ear can hear it. This muted sound could have provided a cue the study’s participants relied on, without having to use the spectral cues from sounds entering the pinna. The scientists used only one volume of tone during their experiments, so to make sure that it really is the spectral cues at play, they would have to try the test with many different volumes of tone, King says.

As for a real-life Daredevil, with hugely enhanced senses? “It’s not a complete myth,” Voss says, extrapolating his new findings to the superhero. “He’s probably better at hearing certain things, but not everything.” 

Science & Society

A peer-reviewed study finds value in peer-reviewed research

By Bethany Brookshire 6:56pm, April 23, 2015
The best scoring peer-reviewed grants are associated with more papers and patents, a new study finds. But whether peer review is the best system is another question entirely.
Neuroscience

Serotonin and the science of sex

By Bethany Brookshire 8:00am, April 10, 2015
Some scientists say that low serotonin makes male mice mate with males and females. Others disagree. In the end, it’s not about sexual preference, but about how science works.
Science & Society

Women in engineering engage best with gender parity

By Bethany Brookshire 5:16pm, April 6, 2015
There are many hypotheses as to why women don’t stay in science or engineering. A new study puts an intervention to the test.
Neuroscience

Our taste in music may age out of harmony

By Bethany Brookshire 11:44am, March 27, 2015
Age-related hearing loss may be more than just the highest notes. The brain may also lose the ability to tell consonance from dissonance, a new study shows.
Neuroscience

Sniffing out human pheromones

By Bethany Brookshire 12:00pm, March 12, 2015
A new review argues that most of the chemicals labeled human pheromones, and the experiments behind them, don’t pass the smell test.
Nutrition

Report offers stimulating recommendation on coffee

By Bethany Brookshire 3:13pm, March 4, 2015
Results from a committee of experts give the blessing to moderate coffee intake. But as we all raise our mugs, the science behind the report is worth a closer look.
Health

There’s more than one way to persuade people to vaccinate

By Bethany Brookshire 4:14pm, February 19, 2015
Fear, facts and attitude are all strategies for promoting immunization
Psychology,, Science & Society

Scientists of a feather flock together

By Bethany Brookshire 8:00am, February 12, 2015
When it comes to major scientific issues such as global warming and GMOs, scientists and the public don’t see eye to eye. It might be because socially, they don’t see each other at all.
Neuroscience

How the brain sees follow-through

By Bethany Brookshire 4:29pm, February 4, 2015
The follow-through on your golf swing is more than just a way to use up extra energy. It’s part of how your brain “sees” a movement.
Science & Society,, Psychology

Attitude, not aptitude, may contribute to the gender gap

By Bethany Brookshire 5:26pm, January 15, 2015
Does talent or hard work matter most? A new survey suggests an emphasis on genius predicts how many women end up in a field of study.
Subscribe to RSS - Scicurious