Science & the Public | Science News



Support credible science journalism.

Subscribe to Science News today.

Science & the Public

Where science
and society meet

Science News

Science & the Public

Science & the Public

No, Kilauea won’t cause mass destruction

Kilauea volcano

ASH CLOUD  A dark cloud of ash spewed from Kilauea’s summit on May 15, rising more than three kilometers into the atmosphere.

Sponsor Message

Kilauea isn’t about to become another Krakatoa. So let’s just stop that rumor right there.

Twitter was awash last weekend in indignant volcanologists responding to a now-corrected Associated Press story that appeared to link the Hawaii volcano to the so-called Ring of Fire, and suggest its eruption could spark others in the ring. That’s just wrong, for a number of reasons.

The Ring of Fire is a picturesque description of the hundreds of volcanoes that surround the Pacific Ocean. Tectonic plates converge along all sides of the Pacific, and where you have converging tectonic plates, you have volcanoes. But an eruption at Mount St. Helens in the Cascades mountain range in the United States, for example, cannot trigger an eruption at Indonesia’s Krakatoa.

Furthermore, Kilauea isn’t at the edge of a tectonic plate. The volcano, along with the other volcanoes that formed the Hawaiian Islands, sits in the center of the Pacific plate. Those volcanoes, some extinct and some still active, have all been fed by a hot spot, a plume of magma rising from deep within Earth’s mantle.

Another Twitter post — also now deleted, thanks to many angry volcanologists — suggested that Kilauea was about to blow, and that it could be as devastating as the planet-scale eruption of Krakatoa in 1883 that killed tens of thousands of people. Also wrong. Yes, the U.S. Geological Survey, or USGS, has said that there is an increasing chance that a steam explosion will happen at Kilauea. And in fact, Kilauea has had such steam explosions before, most recently in 1924.

Kilauea volcanic boulder

But the danger to communities from a steam explosion at Kilauea is pretty limited. One reason that Kilauea and Krakatoa are so different in their explosiveness is silica. Krakatoa, which last erupted in 2017, is a stratovolcano, with tall, steep sides made of ash and lava. Its magma is relatively high in silica, which is also what makes it so explosive. The high silica concentration means the magma is more viscous, or resistant to flow — so any gases it contains struggle to expand. But the change in pressure when the magma reaches Earth’s surface means the gases can suddenly expand — and they do, explosively. 

Kilauea, by contrast, is a shield volcano: Its magma is relatively low in silica and flows easily, oozing out in characteristic ropy flows called pahoehoe and thick, blocky flows called aa. Kilauea’s magma tends to be lower in gas concentrations, as well, and what gas there is finds it easier to escape, so that less pressure builds up within the magma. As a result, the volcano is far less explosive.

The Hawaiian volcano has been erupting more or less continuously since 1983. Its most recent phase, which began in April, has garnered persistent media attention in part because of the location of the newest fissures: along the east flank of the volcano in the middle of a populated subdivision. More than 1,700 residents have been forced to evacuate and watch as slowly encroaching lava swallows houses, roads and cars. Thanks to the ongoing eruption, it’s not clear when they will be able to return home.

USGS’ volcano observatory on Hawaii’s Big Island has been closely monitoring the eruption. Twenty fissures along Kilauea’s east rift zone now are oozing lava. Some small earthquakes continue to shake that area, indicating the ongoing movement of magma through the rift area. A lava lake once visible within the volcano’s summit has completely sunk out of sight, USGS scientists said in a daily news briefing May 15.

That’s a cause for some concern, because it’s where the threat of a steam explosion comes in. As the magma drops further within the central column of the volcano, rocks forming the column may become unstable and topple into the magma. Meanwhile, groundwater in the rocks around the column may also seep in. That potent mix of water and hot rocks could produce steam explosions that could send bits of that rockfall shooting back out of the crater.

The good news is that these volcanic bombs, as those rocks shooting out of a crater are called, have a limited range and won’t travel past the bounds of the national park surrounding the summit, USGS said. As a safety precaution, the National Park Service closed much of the park on May 11, and it remains closed for now while the threat still looms.

But that’s about as explosive as Kilauea is likely to get, and it isn’t likely to have much effect on most people living on the Big Island, let alone the rest of the Hawaiian chain. For now, the main danger to people on the Big Island is ash shooting out the summit crater. As of May 15, USGS noted that the crater is nearly continuously emitting ash that can rise in plumes as much as one to two kilometers above the ground. That ash can make roadways slick, contaminate open water reservoirs and cause some respiratory problems to people living in areas downwind.

Meanwhile, volcanologists continue to keep close watch on the volcano and the oozing lava on its lower east rift zone. Scientists are currently analyzing ash samples to determine their water content, to better understand how large a role water is currently playing in the ash plumes. But so far, according to USGS Hawaii Volcano Observatory deputy scientist in charge Steve Brantley, there’s no evidence of the kind of vigorous explosive activity at the summit that led to its last steam explosions. So not only is Kilauea no Krakatoa, it’s not yet clear whether it’ll be as explosive as it was nearly a century ago.

Science & Society

An antiscience political climate is driving scientists to run for office

By Rachel Ehrenberg 4:03pm, April 13, 2018
Hoping to inject evidence-based science into policy, more scientists are putting their name on the ballot.
Science & Society,, Climate

What we can and can’t say about Arctic warming and U.S. winters

By Carolyn Gramling 9:00am, March 16, 2018
Evidence of a connection is growing stronger, but scientists still struggle to explain why.

Forget Pi Day. We should be celebrating Tau Day

By Emily Conover 11:30am, March 14, 2018
Pi Day may be fun, but it’s based on a flawed mathematical constant.
Computing,, Science & Society

Are computers better than people at predicting who will commit another crime?

By Maria Temming 9:00am, February 20, 2018
If crime-predicting computer programs aren’t any more accurate than human guesswork, do they still have a place in the criminal justice system?
Science & Society

4 questions about the new U.S. budget deal and science

By Emily DeMarco 6:16pm, February 9, 2018
A new spending package could lead to U.S. science agencies getting a bump in funding.
Science & Society

Revisiting the science stories that made us cry, think and say ‘OMG’ in 2017

By Kate Travis 12:00pm, December 27, 2017
Each year Science News selects the top stories for their importance and impact. But the staff’s favorite stories strike a different chord.
Science & Society,, Genetics

Parents may one day be morally obligated to edit their baby’s genes

By Tina Hesman Saey 7:00am, November 28, 2017
The CRISPR debate is moving from “should we or shouldn’t we?” to “do we have to?”
Technology,, Artificial Intelligence,, Science & Society

When it comes to self-driving cars, what’s safe enough?

By Maria Temming 1:51pm, November 21, 2017
Even as unmonitored self-driving cars take to the streets, there’s no consensus about how safe is “safe enough” for driverless vehicles.
Astronomy,, Planetary Science

New questions about Arecibo’s future swirl in the wake of Hurricane Maria

By Lisa Grossman 3:12pm, September 29, 2017
The iconic Arecibo Observatory was damaged in Hurricane Maria, but not as much as originally thought. But its funding is still in doubt.
Earth,, Oceans,, Science & Society

How hurricanes and other devastating disasters spur scientific research

By Ashley Yeager 5:15pm, September 12, 2017
Hurricanes such as Harvey, Irma and others have been devastating, even deadly, yet they drive our desire for scientific discovery.
Subscribe to RSS - Science & the Public